Your search found 9 records
1 Wu, L.; Kuo, C. 1961. Irrigation financing in Taiwan. In Far East Regional Irrigation Seminar, Taiwan, 1-2 May 1961 (pp. 220-224).
Financing ; Development ; Agricultural production / Taiwan
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G574 FAR Record No: H01515)

2 Wu, L.; Hseuh, Y.; Lee, K. 1961. Pumping irrigation in Taiwan. In Far East Regional Irrigation Seminar, Taiwan, 1-2 May 1961 (pp. 245-247).
Pumping ; Groundwater irrigation ; Flow ; Sugarcane / Taiwan
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G574 FAR Record No: H01513)

3 Roberson, M.; Fulton, A.; Wu, L.; Handley, D.; Buss, P.; Oster, J. 1996. Capacitance probe used for cotton irrigation scheduling. In Camp, C. R.; Sadler, E. J.; Yoder, R. E. (Eds.), Evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling: Proceedings of the International Conference, November 3-6, 1996, San Antonio Convention Center, San Antonio, Texas. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.1109-1114.
Irrigation scheduling ; Cotton ; Soil water ; Measurement ; Surface irrigation / USA / California / San Joaquin Valley
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 CAM Record No: H020710)

4 Allaire-Leung, S. E.; Wu, L.; Mitchell, J. P.; Sanden, B. L. 2001. Nitrate leaching and soil nitrate content as affected by irrigation uniformity in a carrot field. Agricultural Water Management, 48(1):37-50.
Sprinkler irrigation ; Soil water ; Nitrogen ; Leaching ; Measurement ; Vegetables ; Percolation ; Plant growth ; Water distribution ; Fertilizers ; Soil properties / USA / California / San Joaquin Valley / Western Kern County
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H028136)

5 French, C.; Wu, L.; Meixner, T.; Haver, D.; Kabashima, J.; Jury, W. A. 2006. Modeling nitrogen transport in the Newport Bay/San Diego Creek watershed of Southern California. Agricultural Water Management, 81(1-2):199-215.
Watersheds ; Models ; Strawberries ; Nitrogen ; Groundwater ; Water pollution ; Surface water / USA / Southern California
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H038446)

6 Wu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yin, G.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Wu, L.; Wang, X.; Hu, Q.; Hao, F. 2021. A collaborated framework to improve hydrologic ecosystem services management with sparse data in a semi-arid basin. Hydrology Research, 52(5):1159-1172. [doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.146]
Hydrology ; Ecosystem services ; Semiarid zones ; Frameworks ; Models ; Water resources ; Water supply ; Water yield ; Sediment ; Runoff ; Precipitation ; Vegetation ; Land cover ; Hydropower / China / Yixunhe River Basin
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050811)
https://iwaponline.com/hr/article-pdf/52/5/1159/950726/nh0521159.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050811.pdf
(0.52 MB) (536 KB)
Applying various models to assess hydrologic ecosystem services (HESs) management has the potential to encourage efficient water resources allocation. However, can a single model designed on these principles be practical to carry out hydrologic ecosystem services management for all purposes? We address this question by fully discussing the advantages of the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model, the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), and the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and tradeoffs (InVEST) model. The analysis is carried both qualitatively and quantitatively at the Yixunhe River basin, China, with a semi-arid climate. After integrating the advantages of each model, a collaborated framework and model selection method have been proposed and validated for optimizing the HESs management at the data sparse scenario. Our study also reveals that the VIC and SWAT model presents the better runoff reproducing ability of the hydrological cycle. Though the InVEST model has less accuracy in runoff simulation, the interannual change rate is similar to the other two models. Furthermore, the InVEST model (1.08 billion m3) has larger simulation result than the SWAT model (0.86 billion m3) for the water yield, while both models have close results for assessment of sediment losses.

7 Wu. L.; Fan, F. 2022. Assessment of ecosystem services in new perspective: a Comprehensive Ecosystem Service Index (CESI) as a proxy to integrate multiple ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 138:108800. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108800]
Ecosystem services ; Assessment ; Models ; Water supply ; Soil organic carbon ; Soil conservation ; Remote sensing ; Land use ; Land cover ; Precipitation ; Urban areas ; Vegetation ; Indicators / China / Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H051100)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22002710/pdfft?md5=753bcfd12c661dd67beddb215e6d54e2&pid=1-s2.0-S1470160X22002710-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H051100.pdf
(23.60 MB) (23.6 MB)
A comprehensive understanding of multiple ecosystem services (ES) across the landscape is a key highlight of ecosystem management. There still remain a weakness to integrate multiple ESs for mirroring the capability of the ecosystems to deliver services in a broad perspective. Here, we proposed a comprehensive ecosystem services index (CESI) for integrating multiple ESs based on multiplicative method. Water supply service, carbon storage service and soil conservation service were assessed using multi-sources remote sensing datasets and InVEST models to build CESI. To examine the suitability and performance of CESI, we took the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Areas (GBA) as a test region. Meanwhile, we applied two previous methods used commonly for assessing multiple ESs: i) cumulative method and ii) maximum value composite method to construct comparative indexes for evaluating the performance of CESI with the help of spatial autocorrelation method and regression analysis method from the spatial pattern and numerical distribution perspective. The results showed that the CESI was well applied in GBA and got rid of the limitation of single ES. The spatial pattern of CESI was observed a high-value clustering in central areas and a low-value clustering in outer regions. A comparison of CESI and comparative indexes were illustrated on the results of linear regression and spatial autocorrelation, which showed a good linear correlation between each method and a similar spatial pattern in a high-value clustering, but had subtle different in low-value clustering. Specifically, the performance of CESI in expressing the low-value clustering was better than other indexes which could indicate the multiplicative method benefits to manifest the lagging in the provision of ESs better than cumulative method and maximum value composite method. This study could pave a way for a new approach to evaluate the provision of multiple ESs from the socio-ecological systems with a comprehensive perspective.

8 Wu, L.; Elshorbagy, A.; Helgason, W. 2023. Assessment of agricultural adaptations to climate change from a water-energy-food nexus perspective. Agricultural Water Management, 284:108343. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108343]
Climate change ; Water productivity ; Energy consumption ; Food security ; Nexus approaches ; Sustainable development ; Agronomic practices ; Crop yield ; Wheat ; Rapeseed ; Peas ; Agricultural production ; Crop production ; Water use ; Soil water ; Drought stress ; Food production ; Water demand ; Irrigation water ; Water supply ; Water availability ; Water power ; Evapotranspiration / Canada / Manitoba / Saskatchewan
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H051919)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002081/pdfft?md5=657e37956f50fdbcc1a8d5655caa586f&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377423002081-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H051919.pdf
(7.22 MB) (7.22 MB)
Adapting agriculture to climate change without deteriorating natural resources (e.g., water and energy) is critical to sustainable development. In this paper, we first comprehensively evaluate six agricultural adaptations in response to climate change (2021–2050) through the lens of the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus in Saskatchewan, Canada, using a previously developed nexus model—WEF-Sask. The adaptations involve agronomic measures (early planting date, reducing soil evaporation, irrigation expansion), genetic improvement (cultivars with larger growing degree days (GDD) requirement), and combinations of individual adaptations. The results show that the selected adaptations compensate for crop yield losses (wheat, canola, pea), caused by climate change, to various extents. However, from a nexus perspective, there are mixed effects on water productivity (WP), total agricultural water (green and blue) use, energy consumption for irrigation, and hydropower generation. Individual adaptations such as early planting date and increased GDD requirement compensate for yield losses in both rainfed (0–60 %) and irrigated (18–100 %) conditions with extra use of green water (5–7 %), blue water (2–14 %), and energy for irrigation (2–14 %). Reducing soil water evaporation benefits the overall WEF nexus by compensating for rainfed yield losses (25–82 %) with less use of blue water and energy consumption for irrigation. The combination of the above three adaptations has the potential to sustain agricultural production in water-scarce regions. If irrigation expansion is also included, the combined adaptation almost fully offsets agricultural production losses from climate change but significantly increases blue water use (143–174 %) and energy consumption for irrigation while reducing hydropower production (3 %). This study provides an approach to comprehensively evaluating agricultural adaptation strategies, in response to climate change, and insights to inform decision-makers.

9 Chen, Z.; Shi, X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, L.; Wei, W.; Ni, B.-J. 2023. Nanoplastics are significantly different from microplastics in urban waters. Water Research X, 19:100169. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100169]
Nanoplastics ; Microplastics ; Pollution control ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Urban watersheds ; Degradation ; Biodegradation ; Sediment
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052112)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914723000051/pdfft?md5=50d72e0ff29509acf0040f051d85366c&pid=1-s2.0-S2589914723000051-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H052112.pdf
(7.69 MB) (7.69 MB)
Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) are ubiquitous and intractable in urban waters. Compared with MPs, the smaller NPs have shown distinct physicochemical features, such as Brownian motion, higher specific surface area, and stronger interaction with other pollutants. Therefore, the qualitative and quantitative analysis of NPs is more challenging than that of MPs. Moreover, these characteristics endow NPs with significantly different environmental fate, interactions with pollutants, and eco-impacts from those of MPs in urban waters. Herein, we critically analyze the current advances in the difference between MPs and NPs in urban waters. Analytical challenges, fate, interactions with surrounding pollutants, and eco-impacts of MPs and NPs are comparably discussed., The characterizations and fate studies of NPs are more challenging compared to MPs. Furthermore, NPs in most cases exhibit stronger interactions with other pollutants and more adverse eco-impacts on living things than MPs. Subsequently, perspective in this field is proposed to stimulate further size-dependent studies on MPs and NPs. This review would benefit the understanding of the role of NPs in the urban water ecosystem and guide future studies on plastic pollution management.

Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from Inmagic WebPublisher PRO