Your search found 12 records
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H013422)
2 Acreman, M. C.. 1996. The IUCN Sahelian Floodplain initiative: Networking to build capacity to manage Sahelian Floodplain resources sustainably. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 12(4):429-436.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H019697)
3 Acreman, M. C.; Hollis, G. E. (Eds.) 1996. Water management and wetlands in Sub-Saharan Africa. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). vi, 249p. (IUCN Wetlands Programme)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G100 ACR Record No: H020249)
4 Scudder, T.; Acreman, M. C.. 1996. Water management for the conservation of the Kafue wetlands, Zambia and the practicalities of artificial flood releases. In Acreman, M. C.; Hollis, G. E. (Eds.), Water management and wetlands in Sub-Saharan Africa. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. pp.101-106.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G100 ACR Record No: H020256)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 5241 Record No: H024772)
6 Acreman, M. C.. (Ed.) 2001. Hydro-ecology: Linking hydrology and aquatic ecology. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS). vii, 162p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 551.48 G000 ACR Record No: H029727)
7 Dunbar, M. J.; Acreman, M. C.. 2001. Applied hydro-ecological science for the twenty-first century. In Acreman, M. C. (Ed.), Hydro-ecology: Linking hydrology and aquatic ecology. Wallingford, UK: IAHS. pp.1-17.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 551.48 G000 ACR Record No: H029728)
8 Sullivan, C. A.; Meigh, J. R.; Giacomello, A. M.; Fediw, T.; Lawrence, P.; Samad, M.; Mlote, S.; Hutton, C.; Allan, J. A.; Schulze, R. E.; Dlamini, D. J. M.; Cosgrove, W.; Priscoli, J. D.; Gleick, P.; Smout, I.; Cobbing, J.; Calow, R.; Hunt, C.; Hussain, A.; Acreman, M. C.; King, J.; Malomo, S.; Tate, E. L.; O’Regan, D.; Milner, S.; Steyl, I. 2003. The water poverty index: development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, 27(3):189-199.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H032686)
9 Acreman, M. C.; Miller, F. 2007. Hydrological impact assessment framework for wetlands. In Ragone, S. (Ed.). The Global Importance of Groundwater in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability, Alicante, Spain, 24-27 January 2006. Westerville, OH, USA: National Groundwater Association. pp.257-276.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.9104 G000 RAG Record No: H040493)
10 Acreman, M. C.; McCartney, Matthew. 2009. Hydrological impacts in and around wetlands. In Maltby, E.; Barker, T. (Eds.). The wetlands handbook. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp.643-666.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H034807)
(4.98 MB)
11 McCartney, Matthew; Acreman, M. C.. 2009. Wetlands and water resources. In Maltby, E.; Barker, T. (Eds.). The wetlands handbook. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp.357-381.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H034808)
(4.53 MB)
12 Arthington, A. H.; Tickner, D.; McClain, M. E.; Acreman, M. C.; Anderson, E. P.; Babu, S.; Dickens, Chris W. S.; Horne, A. C.; Kaushal, N.; Monk, W. A.; O’Brien, G. C.; Olden, J. D.; Opperman, J. J.; Owusu, Afua G.; Poff, N. L.; Richter, B. D.; Salinas-Rodríguez, S. A.; Shamboko Mbale, B.; Tharme, R. E.; Yarnell, S. M. 2023. Accelerating environmental flow implementation to bend the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss. Environmental Reviews, 27p. (Online first) [doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2022-0126]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052092)
(1.91 MB) (1.91 MB)
Environmental flows (e-flows) aim to mitigate the threat of altered hydrological regimes in river systems and connected waterbodies and are an important component of integrated strategies to address multiple threats to freshwater biodiversity. Expanding and accelerating implementation of e-flows can support river conservation and help to restore the biodiversity and resilience of hydrologically altered and water-stressed rivers and connected freshwater ecosystems. While there have been significant developments in e-flow science, assessment, and societal acceptance, implementation of e-flows within water resource management has been slower than required and geographically uneven. This review explores critical factors that enable successful e-flow implementation and biodiversity outcomes in particular, drawing on 13 case studies and the literature. It presents e-flow implementation as an adaptive management cycle enabled by 10 factors: legislation and governance, financial and human resourcing, stakeholder engagement and co-production of knowledge, collaborative monitoring of ecological and social-economic outcomes, capacity training and research, exploration of trade-offs among water users, removing or retrofitting water infrastructure to facilitate e-flows and connectivity, and adaptation to climate change. Recognising that there may be barriers and limitations to the full and effective enablement of each factor, the authors have identified corresponding options and generalizable recommendations for actions to overcome prominent constraints, drawing on the case studies and wider literature. The urgency of addressing flow-related freshwater biodiversity loss demands collaborative networks to train and empower a new generation of e-flow practitioners equipped with the latest tools and insights to lead adaptive environmental water management globally. Mainstreaming e-flows within conservation planning, integrated water resource management, river restoration strategies, and adaptations to climate change is imperative. The policy drivers and associated funding commitments of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework offer crucial opportunities to achieve the human benefits contributed by e-flows as nature-based solutions, such as flood risk management, floodplain fisheries restoration, and increased river resilience to climate change.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from