Your search found 2 records
1 Benin, S.; Johnson, M.; Beintema, N.; Bekele, H.; Chilonda, Pius; Kirsten, I.; Edeme, J.; Elmekass, A.; Govereh, J.; Kakuba, T.; Karugia, J.; Makunike, R.; Massawe, S.; Mpyisi, E.; Nwafor, M.; Omilola, B.; Olubode-Awosola, Femi; Sanyang, S.; Taye, B.; Wanzala, M.; Yade, M.; Zewdie, Y. 2008. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) System for the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 45p. (ReSAKSS Working Paper 6)
Agriculture ; Economic aspects ; Monitoring ; Evaluation ; Investment ; Expenditure ; Indicators ; Data collection / Africa
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H042797)
http://www.resakss.org/index.php?pdf=39399
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H042797.pdf
(0.52 MB)
The purpose of this document is to develop a framework to be used in monitoring progress towards the successful implementation of CAADP and for providing a conceptual basis for assessing the impacts and returns to CAADP investments. With the perspective of managing for impact, the main objectives are: (1) to identify a set of key indicators that are consistent with the underlying logic of CAADP to track progress in resource allocation and achieving stated targets and help answer questions related to the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of the programme; (2) to identify the data required, sources, and methods for estimating values of the indicators; and (3) to lay out a plan for implementing the framework in terms of collecting, managing and analyzing the data, reporting results of the analysis, and obtaining and incorporating feedback for further improvement of the system. This document, and the ultimate outputs of the M&E system, is thus primarily targeted to stakeholders at the national, regional and continent-wide level involved with directing or managing resources for implementing CAADP. This includes: Ministries of Finance, Agriculture, and Local Governments; Departments of Agriculture within Regional Economic Communities, AU/NEPAD, and the donor community concerned with agriculture in Africa. The document and outputs of the system will also be useful to researchers and others interested in CAADP or knowledge on monitoring and evaluating public agricultural investments in general.

2 Karugia, J.; Massawe, S.; Guthiga, P.; Ogada, M.; Nwafor, M.; Chilonda, Pius; Musaba, E. 2016. Factors influencing the effectiveness of productivity-enhancing interventions: an assessment of selected programs. In Benin, S. (Ed.). Agricultural productivity in Africa: trends, patterns, and determinants. Washington, DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). pp.247-333.
Agricultural production ; Productivity ; Intervention ; Development projects ; Program effectiveness ; Performance evaluation ; Performance indexes ; Environmental sustainability ; Community involvement ; Leadership ; Group approaches ; Partnerships ; Financial situation ; Investment ; Farming systems ; Local government ; Political aspects ; Policy ; Gender ; Farmers ; Capacity building ; Case studies / Africa / Benin / Burkina Faso / Burundi / Democratic Republic of the Congo / Eritrea / Ethiopia / Ghana / Guinea / Kenya / Malawi / Mali / Mozambique / Nigeria / Rwanda / Sudan / Tanzania / Togo / Uganda / Zambia / Zimbabwe
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 338.16 G100 BEN Record No: H048032)
http://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/130468/filename/130679.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H048032.pdf
(0.63 MB) (5.03 MB)

Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from Inmagic WebPublisher PRO