Your search found 6 records
1 1992; 1993. Commonwealth universities yearbook 1993. London, UK: Association of Commonwealth Universities. 4 vols.; pp.1-957; 1006-1833; 1988-3005; 3016-3179.
Directories ; Institutions ; Education ; Universities
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: R 378.0025 G000 COM Record No: H013822)
Vol.1 A-H; Vol.2 I-N; Vol.3 P-Z; Vol.4 - Appendices, abbreviations, indexes

2 Athukorala, K. 2001. Higher education in water resources management in Sri Lanka. Study No.6, of a series commissioned by the South Asia Consortium for interdisciplinary Water Resources Studies (SaciWATERs), Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India. 124p.
Water resource management ; Soil management ; Irrigation engineering ; Drainage ; Ecology ; Hydrology ; Microbiology ; Geology ; Higher education ; Educational institutions ; Universities ; Research institutes ; Training courses ; Employment ; Constraints / Sri Lanka
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G744 ATH Record No: H040362)

3 SIWI. 2001. Sustainable development and water security in the Lake Victoria Basin: Building bridges between Lake Victoria and the Baltic Sea: Lake Victoria / Baltic Sea Seminar, Stockholm, August 12, 2001. Stockholm, Sweden: SIWI. 104p. (SIWI Report 15)
Water resources ; River basins ; Catchment areas ; Environmental effects ; Water pollution ; Eutrophication ; Ecosystems ; Biodiversity ; Water resource management ; Legal aspects ; International cooperation ; Poverty ; Higher education ; Universities / Africa / Tanzania / Europe / Lake Victoria / Baltic Sea / Nile Basin
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 SIW Record No: H034835)

4 Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. (Eds.) 2001. Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: SAGE Publications. 468p.
Research methods ; Participatory approaches ; Group approaches ; Social change ; Gender ; Women in development ; Public participation ; Cooperation ; Social institutions ; Interorganizational relationships ; Enterprises ; Educational institutions ; Universities ; Linguistics ; Information technology ; Scientists ; Undergraduates ; Social workers ; Communities ; Indigenous knowledge ; Natural resources management ; Sustainable development ; Research projects ; Experimental design ; Clinical investigations ; Arts ; Photography ; Cultural factors ; Case studies / USA / Africa / Guatemala / Tanzania
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 300.72 G000 REA Record No: H047660)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H047660_TOC.pdf
(0.46 MB)

5 Mahdad, M.; Minh, Thai Thi; Bogers, M. L. A. M.; Piccaluga, A. 2020. Joint university-industry laboratories through the lens of proximity dimensions: moving beyond geographical proximity. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(4):433-456. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2019-0096]
Universities ; Industry ; Joint ventures ; Technology transfer ; Collaboration ; Innovation ; Laboratories ; Case studies ; Institutions ; Organizational dynamics ; Social aspects / Italy
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050116)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050116.pdf
(0.31 MB)
Purpose – There is little known about investigating the importance of all proximity dimensions simultaneously as a result of geographical proximity on university-industry collaborative innovation. This paper aims to answer the question of how geographically proximate university and industry influence cognitive, social, organizational, institutional and cultural proximity within university-industry joint laboratories and finally, what is the outcome of these interplays on collaborative innovation.
Design/methodology/approach – The study uses an exploratory multiple-case study approach. The results are derived from 53 in-depth, semistructured interviews with laboratory directors and representatives from both the company and the university within 8 joint laboratories of Telecom Italia (TIM). The data collection was carried out in 2014 and 2015. The analysis follows a multi-grounded theory approach and relies on a mix of deductive and inductive reasoning with the final goal of theoretical elaboration.
Findings – This study finds the role of social and cultural proximity at the individual level as a result of geographical proximity as an enabler of collaborative innovation by triggering mutual learning, trust formation and frequent interactions. Cognitive proximity at the interface level could systematically influence collaborative innovation, while organizational and institutional proximity has marginal roles in facilitating collaborative innovation. The qualitative analysis offers a conceptual framework for proximity dimensions and collaborative innovation within university-industry joint laboratories.

6 Hernandez-Chea, R.; Mahdad, M.; Minh, Thai Thi; Hjortso, C. N. 2021. Moving beyond intermediation: how intermediary organizations shape collaboration dynamics in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Technovation, 108:102332. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102332]
Entrepreneurship ; Collaboration ; Agroindustrial sector ; Universities ; Research organizations ; Technology transfer ; Resource management ; Innovation ; Markets ; Economic aspects ; Case studies / East Africa / Kenya / Uganda / Nairobi / Kampala
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050495)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497221001139/pdfft?md5=03f877de6e61ce069201db34c9c885d5&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497221001139-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050495.pdf
(0.99 MB) (0.99 MB)
Recently, increasing attention has been paid to entrepreneurial ecosystems and the process of their formation and function. Researchers have noted the important role that intermediary organizations such as incubators play in connecting various actors within ecosystems. Yet our understanding of this role is limited to a few empirical insights. Using resource dependence and embeddedness as theoretical lenses, the present research examines the role of incubators in entrepreneurial ecosystem formation and function, and analyzes how intermediation activities shape collaboration patterns embedded within entrepreneurial ecosystems. Our findings are based on an empirical investigation of two entrepreneurial ecosystems, one in Kenya and one in Uganda. Our analysis of 38 semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurial actors in these ecosystems reveals the underlying structural, operational, and relational conditions that influence the actors’ interaction with each other. We propose three collaboration patterns that emerge among actors in entrepreneurial ecosystems under these conditions: one-sided dependency-based, joint dependency-based, and mutual dependency-based collaborations. We discuss these patterns in detail and identify the circumstances in which each is most likely to occur. This empirical setting clearly shows that beyond their primary roles of providing space, network, and advice to entrepreneurs, intermediary organizations in entrepreneurial ecosystems play a significant role in orchestrating collaborations. Finally, we reflect on the limitations of this study and offer implications for future research.

Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from Inmagic WebPublisher PRO