Your search found 6 records
1 Upadhyaya, A.; Chauhan, H. S. 2000. An analytical solution for bi-level drainage design in the presence of evapotranspiration. Agricultural Water Management, 45(2):169-184.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H026116)
2 Upadhyaya, A.; Chauhan, H. S. 2001. Interaction of stream and sloping aquifer receiving constant recharge. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 127(5):295-301.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H029092)
3 Upadhyaya, A.; Chauhan, H. S. 2001. Falling water tables in horizontal/sloping aquifer. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 127(6):378-384.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H029314)
4 Upadhyaya, A.; Chauhan, H. S. 2002. Water table rise in sloping aquifer due to canal seepage and constant recharge. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 128(3):160-167.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H030569)
5 Molden, David; Oweis, T. Y.; Pasquale, S.; Kijne, J. W.; Hanjra, M. A.; Bindraban, P. S.; Bouman, B. A. M.; Cook, S.; Erenstein, O.; Farahani, H.; Hachum, A.; Hoogeveen, J.; Mahoo, H.; Nangia, V.; Peden, D.; Sikka, A.; Silva, P.; Turral, Hugh; Upadhyaya, A.; Zwart, S. 2007. Pathways for increasing agricultural water productivity. In Molden, David (Ed.). Water for food, water for life: a Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London, UK: Earthscan; Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). pp.279-310.
Water use ; Productivity ; Crop production ; Evapotranspiration ; Water delivery ; Irrigation management ; Fisheries
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 630.7 G000 IWM Record No: H040200)
(2.06 MB)
6 Upadhyaya, A.; Jeet, P.; Singh, A. K.; Kumari, A.; Sundaram, P. K. 2022. Efficacy of influencing factors in the decision-making of irrigation water pricing: a review. Water Policy, 24(6):963-979. [doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.004]
Irrigation water ; Water pricing ; Decision making ; Cost analysis ; Water rates ; Water market ; Water law ; Infrastructure ; Water supply / India
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H051223)
https://iwaponline.com/wp/article-pdf/24/6/963/1067653/024060963.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H051223.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H051223.pdf
(0.41 MB) (416 KB)
The irrigation water-pricing (IWP) system may prove to be an effective tool for meeting the increased demand for water. It includes the totality of costs that water users incur for irrigation purposes, based on principle, i.e., fixed, volumetric and crop-based. Factors like crop type, area irrigated, number of irrigations and total volume of water used by water users are considered for initiating the decision-making process of IWP in many countries of the world. There is no uniform set of principles for fixing water rates; a multiplicity of factors are followed, such as the capacity of irrigators to pay, recovery of water cost, crop water requirement, sources of water supply and its assurance. Linear programming, the Full-cost and Bayesian Network model, Residual value method, Principal Agent model and spot market pricing model have been used to estimate the impact of an IWP policy on water users. In the Indian context, a rationalized IWP mechanism alone will not suffice if the revenue collection mechanism is not streamlined and strengthened throughout the country. In order to develop a full-fledged volumetric IWP system in India, considerable changes need to be made in irrigation water supply infrastructure and operational plans need to be developed, which will provide a good balance between efficiency and equity objectives.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
