Your search found 9 records
1 Nakamura, K.. 1983. Planning and survey of irrigation and drainage. In Nakagawa, S.; Nakagawa, M.; Matsumoto, A.; Chiba, T.; Iwamoto, S.; Iwasaki, K.; Matoba, Y.(Eds.), Advanced rice cultivation, irrigation and drainage technology in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Fuji Marketing Research Co. pp.182-197.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.2 G696 NAK Record No: H013570)
2 Nakamura, K.. 1983. Planning and improvement of irrigation facilities. In Nakagawa, S.; Nakagawa, M.; Matsumoto, A.; Chiba, T.; Iwamoto, S.; Iwasaki, K.; Matoba, Y.(Eds.), Advanced rice cultivation, irrigation and drainage technology in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Fuji Marketing Research Co. pp.198-249.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.2 G696 NAK Record No: H013571)
3 Nakamura, K.. 1983. Planning and improvement of drainage facilities. In Nakagawa, S.; Nakagawa, M.; Matsumoto, A.; Chiba, T.; Iwamoto, S.; Iwasaki, K.; Matoba, Y.(Eds.), Advanced rice cultivation, irrigation and drainage technology in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Fuji Marketing Research Co. pp.250-267.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.2 G696 NAK Record No: H013572)
4 Nakamura, K.; Aoki, M.; Machimura, T.; Hideshima, Y.; Wada, M. 1996. Forecast of evapotranspiration by meteorological information. In Camp, C. R.; Sadler, E. J.; Yoder, R. E. (Eds.), Evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling: Proceedings of the International Conference, November 3-6, 1996, San Antonio Convention Center, San Antonio, Texas. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.463-467.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 CAM Record No: H020618)
5 Nakamura, K.. 1999. Water management for controlling cool summer damage. In Mizutani, M.; Hasegawa, S.; Koga, K.; Goto, A.; Murty, V. V. N. (Eds.), Advanced paddy field engineering. Tokyo, Japan: Shinzan-Sha Sci. & Tech. Publishing Co., Ltd. pp.247-260.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 633.18 G696 MIZ Record No: H024377)
6 Nakamura, K.. (Ed.) 2006. Sustainable production systems of aquatic animals in brackish mangrove areas. Tsukuba, Japan: JIRCAS. 67p. (JIRCAS working report no.44)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 591.76 G570 NAK Record No: H039156)
7 Chongpraditnun, P.; Oda, M.; Nakamura, K.. 2006. Elucidation of water and nutrient dynamics under water-saving cultivation. In Ito, O.; Caldwell, J. S.; Oda, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Hamada, H.; Nishida, T. (Eds.). Increasing economic options in rainfed agriculture in Indochina through efficient use of water resources. Tsukuba, Japan: JIRCAS. pp.63-71.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 630 G800 ITO Record No: H039171)
8 Nakamura, K.. (Ed.) 2007. Sustainable production systems of aquatic animals in brackish mangrove areas (2005) Ibaraki, Japan: Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences. 151p. (JIRCAS Working Report 56)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 591.76 G800 NAK Record No: H041178)
9 Matsuda, S.; Nakamura, K.; Hung, T.; Quang, L. X.; Horino, H.; Hai, P. T.; Ha, N. D.; Hama, T. 2022. Paddy ponding water management to reduce methane emission based on observations of methane fluxes and soil redox potential in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Irrigation and Drainage, 71(1):241-254. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2645]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H051040)
(2.85 MB)
Reducing methane (CH4) emissions from paddy fields that contribute to the greenhouse effect has been addressed recently through the application of the alternate wetting and drying irrigation method. However, in poorly drained areas, such as the Red River Delta in Vietnam, the soil cannot be dried immediately, and so CH4 can continue to be produced unintentionally. Therefore, the purpose of this case study was to identify the optimal ponding water management schedule to reduce CH4 emissions by using the measured data of ponding depth, soil redox potential (Eh), and CH4 fluxes from field experiments and to show its effects on CH4 emission and water conservation. Observations in the winter–spring cropping season showed that the non-flooding period of 3–8 days suppressed CH4 emission, and the continuous flooding period of 14–22 days caused CH4 re-emission. Information regarding the non-flooding period to be maintained and the flooding period to be avoided to suppress CH4 emission was not obtained for the summer–autumn cropping season due to abundant rainfall. The proposed schedule could suppress CH4 emission by 27%–85% and increase the amount of conserved water by up to 18% compared with traditional flooding protocols, but it may increase irrigation water due to the frequency and the amount of re-flooding.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from