Your search found 4 records
1 Reuter, D. J.; Walker, J.; Fitzpatrick, R. W.; Schwenke, G. D.; O’Callaghan, P. G. 2002. Using indicators to assess environmental condition and agricultural sustainability at farm to regional scales. In McVicar, T. R.; Rui, L.; Walker, J.; Fitzpatrick, R. W.; Changming, L. (Eds.), Regional water and soil assessment for managing sustainable agriculture in China and Australia. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR. pp.342-357.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G592 MCV Record No: H033012)
2 Khan, S. 2004. Integrating hydrology with environment, livelihood and policy issues: The Murrumbidgee model. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 20(3):415-429.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H035712)
3 Khan, S. 2006. Economic and institutional considerations for irrigation water savings. In Willett, I. R.; Gao, Z. (Eds.) Agricultural water management in China: Proceedings of a workshop held in Beijing, China, 14 September 2005. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR. pp.125-129.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7 G592 WIL Record No: H039226)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H045617)
(1.54 MB)
Artificial recharge of aquifer storage can provide water during drought periods, reverse falling groundwater levels and reduce water losses associated with leakage and evaporation, as compared with surface water storage. We examine the technical and economic potential of artificial storage and recovery for drought mitigation in the Murrumbidgee Region of New South Wales, Australia. Potential locations for infiltration basins and injection/recovery wells are identified according to criteria such as water availability, aquifer suitability, recharge potential, and potential to provide a usable resource. The estimated annual artificial recharge potential is 180,000 ML through a combination of injection wells and infiltration basins. The cost estimates for artificial recharge vary from AU$ 62 ML1 to AU$ 174 ML1 depending on the choice of recharge method. Underground storage capacity can be developed at less than half the cost of surface storage facilities without undesirable environmental consequences or evaporation losses. The estimated benefits of artificial storage and recovery through infiltration basins are three to seven times the costs, during low allocation years.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from