Your search found 4 records
1 Wilson, L.. 1983. A land-use policy based on water supply. Water Resources Bulletin, 19(6):937-942.
Land use ; Water policy ; Water supply ; Water conservation ; Water management ; Political aspects ; Recharge / USA / New Mexico / Santa Fe County
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 3598 Record No: H015286)
2 Chileshe, P.; Trottier, J.; Wilson, L.. 2005. Translation of water rights and water management in Zambia. In van Koppen, Barbara; Butterworth, J.; Juma, I. (Eds.). African Water Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa: An International Workshop, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26-28 January 2005. pp.30-1/30-11.
Water rights ; Water policy ; Water law ; Water management ; Women ; Farmers ; Gender ; Water scarcity / Zambia / Sefula
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G100 VAN Record No: H038766)
(0.35 MB)
3 Gilman, E. L.; Ellison, J.; Jungblut, V.; Van Lavieren, H.; Wilson, L.; Areki, F.; Brighouse, G.; Bungitak, J.; Dus, E.; Henry, M.; Kilman, M.; Matthews, E.; Sauni, I.; Teariki-Ruatu, N.; Tukia, S.; Yuknavage, K. 2006. Adapting to Pacific Island mangrove responses to sea level rise and climate change. Climate Research, 32:161-176.
Mangroves ; Wetlands ; Monitoring ; Climate change ; Sea level ; Coastal area ; Ecosystems / Pacific Islands / Fiji / Kiribati / Marshall Islands / Micronesia / Nauru / Oalau / Papua New Guinea / Samoa / Solomon Islands / Tonga / Tuvalu / Vanuatu
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: P 7838 Record No: H039940)
(694.73 KB)
4 Wilson, L.. 1998. A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18: 59–71.
(Location: IWMI HQ Record No: H041087)
A nine-step procedure for auditing environmental impact assessments (EIA) identifies the actual impacts that appear to result from a project and uses simple field and office techniques to determine whether those impacts were properly characterized in the EIA. This is more practical than audit procedures commonly described in the literature, which view EIA predictions as scientific hypotheses to be evaluated through rigorous statistical tests and experimental controls. The proposed method can be thought of as an “impacts-backward” approach, in contrast to the scientific or “predictions-forward” method. Application of the procedure to EIAs for coal mines in the south-central United States found a need for: (1) more effective scoping of small projects, to identify project- and site-specific impact issues and (2) more complete discussion of mitigation measures, including exactly who is responsible for ensuring mitigation, and why the proposed mitigation is expected to be successful. Formal mitigation tracking is a specific audit tool that would be of value to EIA practitioners.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
