Your search found 5 records
1 English, M.; Glenn, M.; VanSickle, J. 1981. Scheduling for optimum water use. In American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Irrigation scheduling for water and energy conservation in the 80's. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.61-71. (ASAE publication 23-81)
Irrigation scheduling ; Crops ; Water use efficiency ; Water requirements ; Indicators ; Water stress ; Irrigation practices
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 AME Record No: H03376)

2 English, M.. 1990. Deficit irrigation I: Analytical framework. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 116(3):399-412.
Irrigation systems ; Water use ; Mathematical models ; Water costs
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H06349)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H_6349.pdf

3 English, M.; James, L. 1990. Deficit irrigation II: Observations in Columbia basin. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 116(3):413-426.
Irrigation systems ; Water costs ; Water use ; Crop yield / USA / Columbia
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H06350)

4 English, M.; Raja, S. N. 1996. Perspectives on deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 32(1):1-14.
Water deficit ; Water requirements ; Irrigation requirements ; Irrigation efficiency ; Water use ; Cotton ; Maize ; Water costs ; Economic aspects ; Case studies / USA / Zimbabwe / California / Columbia Basin
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H019749)
An analysis of deficit irrigation in three quite different situations was conducted to better understand the potential benefits and risks associated with this irrigation strategy. Existing crop yield functions and cost functions, developed independently of the present research, were used to estimate the levels of applied water that would produce maximum net income in each situation. These same functions were also used to estimate the degree to which the three crops could be under-irrigated without reducing income below that which would be earned under full irrigation. The analysis encompassed wheat production in the northwestern USA, cotton production in California and maize production in Zimbabwe. Results suggest that (1) deficits of between 15% and 59% would be economically optimal, depending on the circumstances, and (2) the estimated margin for error in these estimates is quite wide.

5 English, M.. 1997. Under-irrigating to boost profits. Irrigation Journal, 47(9):14-15.
Irrigation efficiency ; Irrigation practices ; Water deficit ; Case studies ; Water costs ; Crop yield ; Wheat ; Economic aspects / USA / Oregon
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H021595)

Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from Inmagic WebPublisher PRO