Your search found 11 records
1 Lal, B.; Sarma, P. M. (Eds.) 2011. Wealth from waste: trends and technologies. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: TERI Press. 457p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 363.728 G000 LAL Record No: H043791)
(0.35 MB)
2 Pavlinov, I. Y. (Ed.). 2011. Research in biodiversity - models and applications. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. 364p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H044388)
(33.45 MB) (31.8MB)
3 Wijayadasa, K. H. J. (Ed.) 1997. Harmonising environment and development in South Asia. Colombo, Sri Lanka: South Asia Co-operative Environment Programme (SACEP). 458p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.7 G000 WIJ Record No: H046706)
(0.45 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H046778)
(0.79 MB)
Internationally shared basins supply 60 % of global freshwater supply, are home to about 1/3 of the world’s population, and are focal points for interstate conflict and, as importantly, cooperation. To manage these waters, states have developed a large set of formal treaties, but until now these treaties have been difficult to access and systematically assess. This paper presents and makes publicly available the assembly and organization of the largest known collection of transboundary water agreements in existence. We apply for the first time a “lineage” concept to differentiate between independent agreements and groups of legally related texts, spatially reference the texts to a global basin database, and identify agreement purposes, goals and a variety of content areas. The 688 agreements identified were signed between 1820 and 2007 and constitute 250 independent treaties which apply to 113 basins. While the scope and content varies widely, these treaties nominally govern almost 70 % of the world’s transboundary basin area. In terms of content, treaties have shifted from an earlier focus on regulation and development of water resources to the management of resources and the setting of frameworks for that management. While “traditional” issues such as hydropower, water allocation and irrigation are still important, the environment is now the most commonly mentioned issue in treaty texts. Treaties are also increasingly likely to include data and information sharing provisions, have conflict resolution mechanisms, and include mechanisms for participation beyond traditional nation-state actors. Generalizing, treaties have become more comprehensive over time, both in the issues they address and the tools they use to manage those issues cooperatively.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H046888)
(0.76 MB) (779 KB)
Debates over the effectiveness of foreign aid have been recently revived both in the development sector and in the academia. International funding agencies have notably adopted new principles to improve aid delivery. Using the particular case study of a set of irrigation interventions in Western Nepal, we argue that these steps will not radically improve the pro-poor outcomes of aid interventions as long as the latter are framed in an apolitical, technical and managerial vision and discourse of development. We propose to adopt social and environmental justice as an analytical framework and vocabulary for action.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.73 G744 SRI Record No: H048067)
(0.31 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048291)
(1.35 MB)
Groundwater is often considered a largely local issue that is difficult to regulate. Further, groundwater regulation has often focused on use, rather than protection and conservation. There has thus been little integration of environmental concerns into groundwater regulation. Climate change calls for rethinking the regulatory framework for protecting and regulating groundwater. In India, the climate change regime has not given groundwater adequate prominence. Conversely, groundwater regulation remains largely detached from environmental challenges, including climate change. This needs to be addressed through regulation that links the two fields and is based on legal principles derived from the Constitution of India.
8 Sugg, Z.; Schlager, E. 2018. Participation of stakeholders and citizens in groundwater management: the role of collective action. In Villholth Karen G.; Lopez-Gunn, E.; Conti, K.; Garrido, A.; Van Der Gun, J. (Eds.). Advances in groundwater governance. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC Press. pp.137-155.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI Record No: H048545)
9 Habermehl, R. A. 2018. Groundwater governance in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia. In Villholth Karen G.; Lopez-Gunn, E.; Conti, K.; Garrido, A.; Van Der Gun, J. (Eds.). Advances in groundwater governance. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC Press. pp.411-441.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI Record No: H048559)
10 Marshall, F.; Dolley, J.; Bisht, R.; Priya, R.; Waldman, L.; Amerasinghe, Priyanie; Randhawa, P. 2018. Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation in urbanising contexts. In Schreckenberg, K.; Mace, G.; Poudyal, M. (Eds.). Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: trade-offs and governance. London, UK: Routledge. pp.111-125.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048775)
(155 KB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 WWA Record No: H049044)
(31.02 MB) (31.02 MB)
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from