Your search found 11 records
1 Williams, J.; Hamilton, L. S. 1982. Watershed forest influences in the tropics and subtropics: A selected, annotated bibliography. Honolulu, HI, USA: Environment and Policy Institute. xiii, 217p.
Bibliographies ; Agroforestry ; Erosion ; Evaporation ; Groundwater ; Infiltration ; Land classification ; Land use ; Research methods ; Runoff ; Soil conservation ; Stream flow ; Water budget
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91016 G000 WIL Record No: H017632)
2 Williams, J.. 2005. Information requirements for decision-making in African IWRM: the CEOS TIGER Initiative: an exploration of the role of space data. Paper presented at the East Africa Integrated River Basin Management Conference, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 7-9 March 2005. [Vol.1]. Funded by IWMI, and others. 5p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G132 SOK Record No: H037523)
3 White, I.; Melville, M.; Macdonald, B. C. T.; Quirk, R.; Hawken, R.; Tunks, M.; Buckley, D.; Beattie, R.; Heath, L.; Williams, J.. 2006. From conflict to industry – regulated best practice guidelines: a casestudy of estuarine flood plain management of the Tweed River, Eastern Australia. In Hoanh, Chu Thai; Tuong, T. P.; Gowing, J. W.; Hardy, B. (Eds.). Environment and livelihoods in tropical coastal zones: managing agriculture, fishery, aquaculture conflicts. Wallingford, UK: CABI; Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI); Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI) pp.107-125. (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 2)
Flood plains ; Drainage ; Rivers ; Estuaries ; Ecosystems ; Soil management / Australia / Tweed River
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 639.8 G000 HOA Record No: H039110)
4 Hellmuth, M. E.; Moorhead, A.; Thomson, M. C.; Williams, J.. (Eds.) 2007. Climate risk management in Africa: learning from practice. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University. International Research Institute for Climate and Society. 104p.
Climate ; Risk management ; Climate change ; Drought ; Flood control ; Food security ; Malaria ; Case studies / Africa / Mozambique / Ethiopia / Mali / Malawi
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 304.25 G100 HEL Record No: H041293)
5 Williams, J.; Martin, P. 2014. Developing law and governance strategies for peri-urban sustainability. In Maheshwari, B.; Purohit, R.; Malano, H.; Singh, V. P.; Amerasinghe, Priyanie. (Eds.). The security of water, food, energy and liveability of cities: challenges and opportunities for peri-urban futures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp.435-447. (Water Science and Technology Library Volume 71)
Legal aspects ; Governance ; Periurban areas ; Sustainability ; Food security ; Ecosystem services ; Political aspects ; Policy ; Risk assessment ; Natural resources management ; Corporate culture ; Case studies / Australia / Western Sydney
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI Record No: H047052)
Western Sydney is a peri-urban region of Greater Sydney in the state of New South Wales, Australia lying within the Hawkesbury Nepean catchment. This catchment has high environmental, cultural and social significance providing vital ecosystem services such as drinking water, food, fibre, nutrient and water cycling, fauna habitat and cultural diversity. The economic value generated from these services includes $1 billion per annum in agriculture and over $6 million a year in commercial fishing. Western Sydney continues to experience ongoing environmental degradation and water shortages as a result of urban development, population demand and climate change. Land use conflicts, climate change predictions and competition for scarce water resources has placed water and food security as high priority issues, as in many other peri-urban regions across the globe. New law and governance strategies are required for peri-urban regions to harmonise the co-existence of agriculture, urban and other land uses. This paper presents a range of methods developed via a case study in Western Sydney (from 2007 to 2010) to facilitate new law and governance strategies for better legal and institutional protection of peri-urban food security and sustainable production.
6 Slika, J. W. F.; Arroyo-Rodriguezb, V.; Aibac, S.-I.; Alvarez-Loayzad, P.; Alvese, L. F.; Ashton, P.; Balvanera, P.; Bastian, M. L.; Bellingham, P. J.; van den Berg, E.; Bernacci, L.; da Conceicao Bispo, P.; Blanc, L.; Bohning-Gaese, K.; Boeckx, P.; Bongers, F.; Boyle, B.; Bradford, M.; Brearley, F. Q.; Hockemba, M. B.-N.; Bunyavejchewin, S.; Matos, D. C. L.; Castillo-Santiago, M.; Catharino, E. L. M.; Chai, S.-L.; Chen, Y.; Colwell, R. K.; Robin, C. L.; Clark, C.; Clark, D. B.; Clark, D. A.; Culmsee, H.; Damas, K.; Dattaraja, H. S.; Dauby, G.; Davidar, P.; DeWalt, S. J.; Doucet, J.-L.; Duque, A.; Durigan, G.; Eichhorn, K. A. O.; Eisenlohr, P. V.; Eler, E.; Ewango, C.; Farwig, N.; Feeley, K. J.; Ferreira, L.; Field, R.; de Oliveira Filho, A. T.; Fletcher, C.; Forshed, O.; Franco, G.; Fredriksson, G.; Gillespie, T.; Gillet, J.-F.; Amarnath, Giriraj; Griffith, D. M.; Grogan, J.; Gunatilleke, N.; Harris, D.; Harrison, R.; Hector, A.; Homeier, J.; Imai, N.; Itoh, A.; Jansen, P. A.; Joly, C. A.; de Jong, B. H. J.; Kartawinata, K.; Kearsley, E.; Kelly, D. L.; Kenfack, D.; Kessler, M.; Kitayama, K.; Kooyman, R.; Larney, E.; Laumonier, Y.; Laurance, S.; Laurance, W. F.; Lawes, M. J.; do Amaral, I . L.; Letcher, S. G.; Lindsell, J.; Lu, X.; Mansor, A.; Marjokorpi, A.; Martin, E. H.; Meilby, H.; Melo, F. P. L.; Metcalfea, D. J.; Medjibe, V. P.; Metzger, J. P.; Millet, J.; Mohandass, D.; Montero, J. C.; de Morisson Valeriano, M.; Mugerwa, B.; Nagamasu, H.; Nilus, R.; Onrizal, S. O.-G.; Page, N.; Parolin, P.; Parren, M.; Parthasarathy, N.; Paudel, E.; Permana, A.; Piedade, M. T. F.; Pitman, N. C. A.; Poorter, L.; Poulsen, A. D.; Poulsen, J.; Powers, J.; Prasad, R. C.; Puyravaud, J.-P.; Razafimahaimodison, J.-C.; Reitsma, J.; dos Santos, J. R.; Spironello, W. R.; Romero-Saltos, H.; Rovero, F.; Rozak, A. H.; Ruokolainen, K.; Rutishauser, E.; Saiter, F.; Saner, P.; Santos, B. A.; Santos, F.; Sarker, S. K.; Satdichanh, M.; Schmitt, C. B.; Schongart, J.; Schulze, M.; Suganuma, M. S.; Sheil, D.; da Silva Pinheiro, E.; Sist, P.; Stevart, T.; Sukumar, R.; Sun, I.-F.; Sunderand, T.; Suresh, H. S.; Suzuki, E.; Tabarelli, M.; Tang, J.; Targhetta, N.; Theilade, I.; Thomas, D. W.; Tchouto, P.; Hurtado, J.; Valencia, R.; van Valkenburg, J. L. C. H.; Van Do, T.; Vasquez, R.; Verbeeck, H.; Adekunle, V.; Vieira, S. A.; Webb, C. O.; Whitfeld, T.; Wich, S. A.; Williams, J.; Wittmann, F.; Woll, H.; Yang, X.; Yao, C. Y. A.; Yap, S. L.; Yoneda, T.; Zahawi, R. A.; Zakaria, R.; Zang, R.; de Assis, R. L.; Luize, B. G.; Venticinque, E. M. 2015. An estimate of the number of tropical tree species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24):7472-7477. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423147112]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047084)
7 Grafton, R. Q.; McLindin, M.; Hussey, K.; Wyrwoll, P.; Wichelns, D.; Ringler, C.; Garrick, D.; Pittock, J.; Wheeler, S.; Orr, S.; Matthews, N.; Ansink, E.; Aureli, A.; Connell, D.; De Stefano, L.; Dowsley, K.; Farolfi, S.; Hall, J.; Katic, Pamela; Lankford, B.; Leckie, H.; McCartney, Matthew; Pohlner, H.; Ratna, N.; Rubarenzya, M. H.; Raman, S. N. S.; Wheeler, K.; Williams, J.. 2016. Responding to global challenges in food, energy, environment and water: risks and options assessment for decision-making. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 3(2):275-299. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.128]
Risk assessment ; Food security ; Food production ; Energy ; Sustainable development ; Intensification ; Resilience ; Environmental effects ; Water resources ; Decision making ; Households ; Stakeholders ; Farmers ; Poverty
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047589)
(1.14 MB) (1.14 MB)
We analyse the threats of global environmental change, as they relate to food security. First, we review three discourses: (i) ‘sustainable intensification’, or the increase of food supplies without compromising food producing inputs, such as soils and water; (ii) the ‘nexus’ that seeks to understand links across food, energy, environment and water systems; and (iii) ‘resilience thinking’ that focuses on how to ensure the critical capacities of food, energy and water systems are maintained in the presence of uncertainties and threats. Second, we build on these discourses to present the causal, risks and options assessment for decision-making process to improve decisionmaking in the presence of risks. The process provides a structured, but flexible, approach that moves from problem diagnosis to better risk-based decision-making and outcomes by responding to causal risks within and across food, energy, environment and water systems.
8 Rockstrom, J.; Williams, J.; Daily, G.; Noble, A.; Matthews, N.; Gordon, L.; Wetterstrand, H.; DeClerck, F.; Shah, M.; Steduto, P.; de Fraiture, C.; Hatibu, N.; Unver, O.; Bird, Jeremy; Sibanda, L.; Smith, J. 2017. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio, 46(1):4-17. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0793-6]
Sustainable agriculture ; Agricultural development ; Intensification ; Anthropology ; Living standards ; Resilience ; Environmental impact ; Poverty ; Landscape ; Ecosystem services ; Food security ; Solar energy ; Groundwater
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047656)
(1.93 MB)
There is an ongoing debate on what constitutes sustainable intensification of agriculture (SIA). In this paper, we propose that a paradigm for sustainable intensification can be defined and translated into an operational framework for agricultural development. We argue that this paradigm must now be defined—at all scales—in the context of rapidly rising global environmental changes in the Anthropocene, while focusing on eradicating poverty and hunger and contributing to human wellbeing. The criteria and approach we propose, for a paradigm shift towards sustainable intensification of agriculture, integrates the dual and interdependent goals of using sustainable practices to meet rising human needs while contributing to resilience and sustainability of landscapes, the biosphere, and the Earth system. Both of these, in turn, are required to sustain the future viability of agriculture. This paradigm shift aims at repositioning world agriculture from its current role as the world’s single largest driver of global environmental change, to becoming a key contributor of a global transition to a sustainable world within a safe operating space on Earth.
9 Clarke, N.; Bizimana, J.-C.; Dile, Y.; Worqlul, A.; Osorio, J.; Herbst, B.; Richardson, J. W.; Srinivasan, R.; Gerik, T. J.; Williams, J.; Jones, C. A.; Jeong, J. 2017. Evaluation of new farming technologies in Ethiopia using the Integrated Decision Support System (IDSS). Agricultural Water Management, 180(Part B):267-279. (Special issue: Agricultural Water and Nonpoint Source Pollution Management at a Watershed Scale Part II Overseen by: Dr. Brent Clothier). [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.023]
Farming systems ; Decision support systems ; Technological changes ; Evaluation ; Water management ; Small scale systems ; Models ; Nutrition ; Energy consumption ; Cropping systems ; Farm income ; Socioeconomic environment ; Watersheds ; Environmental sustainability ; Villages / Ethiopia / Amhara Region / Fogera Woreda / Weg-Arba Amba Kebele / Shena Kebele / Lake Tana
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047957)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416302694/pdfft?md5=7548f347c9ff8e0db60dca03902b7abe&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377416302694-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H047957.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H047957.pdf
(3.19 MB) (3.19 MB)
This study investigates multi-dimensional impacts of adopting new technology in agriculture at the farm/village and watershed scale in sub-Saharan Africa using the Integrated Decision Support System (IDSS). Application of IDSS as an integrated modeling tool helps solve complex issues in agricultural systems by simultaneously assessing production, environmental, economic, and nutritional consequences of adopting agricultural technologies for sustainable increases in food production and use of scarce natural resources. The IDSS approach was applied to the Amhara region of Ethiopia, where the scarcity of resources and agro-environmental consequences are critical to agricultural productivity of small farm, to analyze the impacts of alternative agricultural technology interventions. Results show significant improvements in family income and nutrition, achieved through the adoption of irrigation technologies, proper use of fertilizer, and improved seed varieties while preserving environmental indicators in terms of soil erosion and sediment loadings. These pilot studies demonstrate the usefulness of the IDSS approach as a tool that can be used to predict and evaluate the economic and environmental consequences of adopting new agricultural technologies that aim to improve the livelihoods of subsistence farmers.
10 Grafton, R. Q.; Williams, J.; Perry, C. J.; Molle, F.; Ringler, C.; Steduto, P.; Udall, B.; Wheeler, S. A.; Wang, Y.; Garrick, D.; Allen, R. G. 2018. The paradox of irrigation efficiency: higher efficiency rarely reduces water consumption. Science, 361(6404):748-750. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9314]
Irrigation efficiency ; Water use ; Irrigation methods ; Sprinkler irrigation ; Drip irrigation ; Surface irrigation ; Water accounting ; Water policy ; Watersheds ; River basins ; Crop production
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049033)
(1.42 MB)
Reconciling higher freshwater demands with finite freshwater resources remains one of the great policy dilemmas. Given that crop irrigation constitutes 70% of global water extractions, which contributes up to 40% of globally available calories (1), governments often support increases in irrigation efficiency (IE), promoting advanced technologies to improve the “crop per drop.” This provides private benefits to irrigators and is justified, in part, on the premise that increases in IE “save” water for reallocation to other sectors, including cities and the environment. Yet substantial scientific evidence (2) has long shown that increased IE rarely delivers the presumed public-good benefits of increased water availability. Decision-makers typically have not known or understood the importance of basin-scale water accounting or of the behavioral responses of irrigators to subsidies to increase IE. We show that to mitigate global water scarcity, increases in IE must be accompanied by robust water accounting and measurements, a cap on extractions, an assessment of uncertainties, the valuation of trade-offs, and a better understanding of the incentives and behavior of irrigators.
11 Williams, J.; Beveridge, R.; Mayaux, P.-L. 2023. Unconventional waters: a critical understanding of desalination and wastewater reuse. Water Alternatives, 16(2):429-443.
Wastewater treatment ; Water reuse ; Water resources ; Water scarcity ; Political aspects ; Economic aspects ; Sustainability ; Stakeholders ; Infrastructure ; Water governance ; Water supply ; Energy ; Justice ; Decision making
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052198)
https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol16/v16issue2/714-a16-2-15/file
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H052198.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H052198.pdf
(0.36 MB) (372 KB)
The growth of 'unconventional' water resources as a new resource frontier has been much touted over the last two decades and is transforming society’s relationship with water in diverse contexts. Desalination and wastewater reuse, in particular, are increasingly framed together as potentially game-changing technologies for water management and (re)distribution and are carried forward by promises to overcome water scarcity and enhance water security. While there are good reasons to critique the conflation of heterogeneous water resources under the single heading of 'unconventional', we argue that the scale and scope of the transition towards desalination and treated wastewater (which often use similar technologies) merit their inclusion in one Special Issue. The papers presented in this issue advance our understanding of the social, political, economic and cultural dimensions of this water transition. The papers are conceptually and empirically diverse, with case studies across the Global North and Global South. They offer an important counterbalance to the dominant techno-triumphalist narratives that typically surround these technologies, providing unconventional perspectives on unconventional water. In this opening paper, we chart the emergence of unconventional water. We then introduce the papers and highlight the cross-cutting themes of the issue: 1) the (de)politicising discourses that frame desalination and wastewater; 2) the political economies of unconventional water; 3) the materiality and politics of these technologies; and 4) their implications for water justice.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
