Your search found 5 records
1 Alcamo, J.; Doll, P.; Kaspar, F.; Siebert, S. 1997. Global change and global scenarios of water use and availability: An application of Water GAP1.0. Kassel, Germany: University of Kassel. Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR) 47p. + appendices.
Water use ; Water availability ; Climate ; Indicators ; Water scarcity ; Water balance ; Precipitation ; Evapotranspiration ; Runoff ; Hydrology ; Simulation models ; Calibrations ; Rivers ; Irrigation water ; Water use efficiency
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 5896 Record No: H029013)
2 Smakhtin, Vladimir U.; Revenga, C.; Doll, P.. 2004. Taking into account environmental water requirements in global-scale water resources assessments. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Comprehensive Assessment Secretariat. v, 24p. (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Research Report 002) [doi: https://doi.org/10.3910/2009.391]
Environmental effects ; Water requirements ; Assessment ; Water availability ; water stress ; Water scarcity ; Hydrology ; Water allocation ; Environmental effects
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.5 G000 SMA Record No: H031758)
(1.10 MB)
3 Alcamo, J.; Doll, P.; Henrichs, T.; Kaspar, F.; Lehner, B.; Rosch, T.; Siebert, S. 2003. Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(3):317- 337.
Water availability ; Assessment ; River basins ; Hydrology ; Models ; Calibration ; Runoff ; Water balance ; Water scarcity ; Water stress ; Water use ; Domestic water ; Industrialization ; Irrigation water
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H041280)
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ftinterface~content=a918693024~fulltext=713240930~frm=content
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H041280.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H041280.pdf
4 Wood, E. F.; Roundy, J. K.; Troy, T. J.; van Beek, L. P. H.; Bierkens, M. F. P.; Blyth, E.; de Roo, A.; Doll, P.; Ek, M.; Famiglietti, J.; Gochis, D.; van de Giesen, N.; Houser, P.; Jaffe, P. R.; Kollet, S.; Lehner, B.; Lettenmaier, D. P.; Peters-Lidard, C.; Sivapalan, M.; Sheffield, J.; Wade, A.; Whitehead, P. 2011. Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: meeting a grand challenge for monitoring earth’s terrestrial water. Water Resources Research, 47:10.
Land cover ; Surface water ; Hydrology ; Social aspects ; Water quality ; Soil moisture ; Weather ; Climate
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H045083)
(1.23 MB)
5 Herbert, C.; Doll, P.. 2019. Global assessment of current and future groundwater stress with a focus on transboundary aquifers. Water Resources Research, 55(6):4760-4784. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023321]
Water stress ; Groundwater depletion ; International waters ; Aquifers ; Assessment ; Indicators ; Groundwater recharge ; Water use ; Water storage ; Irrigated land ; Climate change ; Forecasting ; Models ; Uncertainty
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049257)
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2018WR023321
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049257.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049257.pdf
(3.17 MB) (3.17 MB)
We quantified groundwater stress worldwide by applying the global water resources and water use model WaterGAP 2.2b (Water - Global Assessment and Prognosis) for current conditions (1981–2010) as well as for the 2050s under the worst-case greenhouse gas emissions scenario RCP8.5. To improve global-scale groundwater stress assessments, we suggest three new water quantity-related groundwater stress indicators as well as a new way for communicating projected future groundwater stress at the grid-cell level (~55 × 55 km) and for larger spatial units such as transboundary aquifers (>20,000 km2). The new indicators encompass the ratio of net abstractions from groundwater to groundwater recharge, human-induced changes in groundwater discharge, and human-induced groundwater depletion. We compare them to four conventional indicators used in the Transboundary Waters Assessment Programme and show how they can add value to global-scale studies or are even more suitable for indicating groundwater stress. We assess potentials and limitations of all indicators by addressing their level of process representation, data requirements, uncertainty, and the underlying different concepts of sustainable groundwater use. To support adaptation to climate change, we recommend showing both the ensemble mean and the worst-case scenario of future groundwater stress that we derived from five climate and two irrigation scenarios. For characterizing groundwater stress in spatial units such as transboundary aquifers, areal fractions where a selected indicator threshold is exceeded should be considered. Finally, hot spots of future groundwater stress should be identified by combining relative changes from current conditions with absolute values of future groundwater stress.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
