Your search found 47 records
1 Nijman, C. 1992. Irrigation decision-making processes and conditions: a case study of Sri Lanka's Kirindi Oya Irrigation Settlement Project. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI). xxxiv, 314p. (IIMI Country Paper Sri Lanka 9)
Irrigation management ; Decision making ; Farmer-agency interactions ; Accountability ; Case studies ; Sustainability ; River basin development ; Water allocation ; Water requirements ; Project appraisal ; Indicators / Sri Lanka / Kirindi Oya
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.8 G744 NIJ Record No: H012616)
(27.39 MB)
Detailed study of decision-making processes and managerial conditions of the Kirindi Oya Irrigation and Settlement Project in Sri Lanka, adopting a management perspective in the analysis of the performance of this major irrigation system in Sri Lanka. This paper is a companion document to "Irrigation management processes and conditions" by the same author.
2 de Silva, Sanjiv; Senaratna Sellamuttu, Sonali; Kodituwakku, D. C.; Atapattu, S. 2011. Governance performance in integrated coastal management: Sri Lanka country report. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 91p.
Coastal area ; Legislation ; Transparency ; Accountability ; Rules ; Participatory management ; Public participation ; Decision making ; Institutions ; Government departments ; Case studies ; Wetlands ; Lagoons ; Mangroves ; Access to information ; Legal rights / Sri Lanka / Hikkaduwa / Rekawa Lagoon / Muthurajawela Lagoon / Negambo Lagoon
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI Record No: H044786)
(3.12 MB) (3MB)
3 de Silva, Sanjiv; Senaratna Sellamuttu, Sonali; Kodituwakku, D. C.; Atapattu, S. 2011. Governance performance in integrated coastal management: Sri Lanka country report. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 91p.
Coastal area ; Legislation ; Transparency ; Accountability ; Rules ; Participatory management ; Public participation ; Decision making ; Institutions ; Government departments ; Case studies ; Wetlands ; Lagoons ; Mangroves ; Access to information ; Legal rights / Sri Lanka / Hikkaduwa / Rekawa Lagoon / Muthurajawela Lagoon / Negambo Lagoon
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI c2 Record No: H044787)
(3 MB)
4 Braimah, I.; Amponsah, O.; Asibey, M. O. 2016. The effectiveness of the local management systems of rural water facilities for sustainable service delivery: a case study of the Sekyere East District, Ghana. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2(4):405-418. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-016-0070-7]
Water supply ; Sustainability ; Rural communities ; Community management ; Drinking water ; Boreholes ; Maintenance ; Managers ; Accountability ; Households ; Case studies / Ghana / Sekyere East District
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047908)
(0.82 MB)
Involving communities in the operation and maintenance (O&M) of water facilities is expected to be a cost-effective means of ensuring sustainable provision of water to rural communities in Ghana. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the community-based management strategy for the O&M of water facilities in the Sekyere East District of Ghana and to identify the best practices for replication. The data for the study were gathered from the District Water and Sanitation Team (DWST), Water and Sanitation (WATSAN) Committees and Water Boards (WBs) through direct interviews and focus group discussions. Analyses of the data revealed that the spirit of voluntarism that was expected to drive the local managers to be effective was fading away. Furthermore, the local managers were unable to mobilise adequate revenue to defray the cost of O&M partly due to households’ reluctance to pay coupled with the general lack of accountability on the part of the managers. The authors concluded that for the local managers to be effective, they need to be effectively motivated so that they could in turn be accountable to the community members.
5 Apgar, J. M.; Cohen, P. J.; Ratner, B. D.; de Silva, Sanjiv; Buisson, Marie-Charlotte; Longley, C.; Bastakoti, Ram C.; Mapedza, Everisto. 2017. Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research. Ecology and Society, 22(1):1-13. [doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08929-220109]
Aquatic environment ; Agricultural systems ; Equity ; Participatory approaches ; Collective action ; Research ; Governance ; Authorities ; Resource management ; Floodplains ; Living standards ; Ownership ; Stakeholders ; Accountability ; Ecological factors / Zambia / Solomon Islands / Bangladesh / Cambodia
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047980)
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss1/art9/ES-2016-8929.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H047980.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H047980.pdf
(156 KB)
Challenges of governance often constitute critical obstacles to efforts to equitably improve livelihoods in social-ecological systems. Yet, just as often, these challenges go unspoken, or are viewed as fixed parts of the context, beyond the scope of influence of agricultural, development, or natural resource management initiatives. What does it take to get governance obstacles and opportunities out in the open, creating the space for constructive dialogue and collective action that can help to address them? We respond to this question by comparing experiences of participatory action research (PAR) in coastal and floodplain systems in four countries (Zambia, Solomon Islands, Bangladesh, and Cambodia) with a focus on understanding how to build more equitable governance arrangements. We found that governance improvement was often an implicit or secondary objective of initiatives that initially sought to address more technical natural resource or livelihood-related development challenges. We argue that using PAR principles of ownership, equity, shared analysis, and feedback built trust and helped to identify and act upon opportunities to address more difficult-to-shift dimensions of governance particularly in terms of stakeholder representation, distribution of authority, and accountability. Our findings suggest that the engaged and embedded approach of researcher-facilitators can help move from identifying opportunities for governance change to supporting stakeholders as they build more equitable governance arrangements.
6 van Koppen, Barbara; Tapela, B. N.; Mapedza, Everisto. 2018. Joint ventures in the Flag Boshielo Irrigation Scheme, South Africa: a history of smallholders, states and business. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 43p. (IWMI Research Report 171) [doi: https://doi.org/10.5337/2018.202]
Joint ventures ; Irrigation schemes ; Smallholders ; Farmers ; Agribusiness ; Farming systems ; Agricultural policy ; Small scale systems ; Irrigated farming ; Land tenure ; Land ownership ; Resettlement ; Gender ; Public-private cooperation ; Contract farming ; Water resources development ; Food security ; Infrastructure ; Labour ; State intervention ; Crop production ; Cotton ; Policy making ; Accountability / South Africa
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI Record No: H048492)
(703 KB)
The report analyzes the changing tripartite constellations between South African black smallholders, the pre- and post-apartheid state, and the country’s large-scale agribusiness and irrigation industry. A recent mode of farming is the ‘joint venture’, in which smallholders hand over land and share in the net profits, while a strategic partner manages the cultivation with own inputs and equipment, and markets the output. With a focus on the 13 sub-schemes of the Flag Boshielo irrigation scheme in the former homeland of Lebowa (current Limpopo Province), the report analyzes the emergence of six joint ventures - the collapse of three and the troubled continuation of the other three. For the government’s support to joint ventures as one of the options of the revitalization of smallholder irrigation schemes in former homelands, it is recommended to ensure there is a robust bilateral contract between smallholders and the strategic partner, to strengthen land tenure arrangements, and to diversify irrigation technologies for women and men smallholders.
7 Nhemachena, Charles; Matchaya, Greenwell; Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso. 2017. Strengthening mutual accountability and performance in agriculture in Southern Africa. South African Journal of Science, 113(5/6):1-7. [doi: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160185]
Agricultural sector ; Agricultural policy ; Investment ; Evaluation ; Accountability ; Stakeholders ; Planning ; Implementation ; Monitoring ; Financing / Southern Africa / Malawi / Mozambique / Swaziland / Zambia
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048610)
(190 KB)
We critically assessed experiences in the implementation of agricultural joint sector reviews in supporting mutual accountability in Southern Africa, focusing on the lessons learned, the challenges and recommendations for improvement. Empirical data were gathered from four countries that have implemented joint sector reviews: Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland and Zambia. The results show that recent efforts to conduct joint sector review assessments in these countries have raised the quest for increased accountability for action and results. Despite progress to strengthen mutual accountability in the countries, monitoring and evaluation capacity remains a concern, especially at sub-national levels. The mutual accountability process and implementation of the agricultural joint sector review processes in the respective countries have come a long way in facilitating sector-wide engagement of stakeholders in planning, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of agricultural policies and programmes. These processes are critical to ensure effective implementation and realisation of development impacts of agricultural priorities in the national agricultural investment plans.
8 Humphreys, E.; van der Kerk, A.; Fonseca, C. 2018. Public finance for water infrastructure development and its practical challenges for small towns. Water Policy, 20(S1):100-111. (Special issue: Water Services in Small Towns - Experiences from the Global South) [doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2018.007]
Water resources development ; Public finance ; Water supply ; Infrastructure ; Urban areas ; Towns ; Sustainable Development Goals ; State intervention ; Accountability ; Income ; Tariffs ; Taxes ; Loans ; Capital market ; Population density ; Equity
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048720)
(0.15 MB)
The small and fluctuating population, the economic characteristics and administrative capacity of small towns not only pose infrastructural challenges for providing services, but also limit the possibilities for generating local revenues for financing water infrastructure development and maintenance. This limited ability to generate local resources for water infrastructure is exacerbated by the way in which scarce public funds are allocated. A first concern is linked to an urban bias that characterizes allocation of funds by central governments. A second concerns the prioritization of other sectors by allocation decisions of local governments. These local governments often prioritize other sectors such as education, health and agriculture for the use of scarce local public resources. What this discussion highlights is that existing models used for financing water infrastructure development do not seem very applicable to the realities of small towns. Additional research and models are necessary to allow for solutions that are better tailored to these realities.
9 Jimenez, A; Livsey, J.; Ahlen, I.; Scharp, C.; Takane, M. 2018. Global assessment of accountability in water and sanitation services using GLAAS [Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water] data. Water Alternatives, 11(2):238-259.
Water supply ; Sanitation ; Drinking water ; Accountability ; Assessment ; Enforcement ; Regulations ; Human rights ; Policies ; Donors ; State intervention ; Urban areas ; Rural areas ; Surveys
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048799)
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol11/v11issue2/435-a11-2-2/file
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H048799.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H048799.pdf
(0.91 MB) (936 KB)
The Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water (GLAAS) is one of UN-Water’s regular reports. Its focuses include aspects of investment and the enabling environment for the delivery of water, sanitation and hygiene services. Accountability refers to the mechanisms through which duty bearers, elected officials and service providers report to rights holders and other stakeholders within the service delivery framework. Accountability contributes to good sector performance and the overall sustainability of services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of accountability in the drinking-water and sanitation sector globally, based on the available data from the GLAAS survey of 2014. To achieve this, accountability was defined from a human rights perspective, and particularised for water and sanitation. Next the quantitative and open-ended questions from the GLAAS survey that related to this definition were analysed for all 94 responding countries. Comparisons were drawn between water and sanitation services in urban and rural settings, and regional trends were identified. The results show higher levels of accountability for water than sanitation services, and limited information on wastewater. Potential means to strengthen accountability in water and sanitation globally are seen to include improving access to information on the services provided, enacting participation policies and increasing the capacity of regulatory institutions. Particular attention should be paid to rural services. The GLAAS survey could be modified for a better understanding of the accountability mechanisms for WASH service provision.
10 Benin, S.; Ulimwengu, J.; Matchaya, Greenwell; Makombe, T.; Lorka, M.; Vodounhessi, A.; Tefera, W. 2018. Mutual accountability in CAADP [Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme] and agricultural transformation. In Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). Africa agriculture status report: catalyzing government capacity to drive agricultural transformation (Issue 6). Nairobi, Kenya: Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) pp.150-184.
Agricultural development ; Agricultural policy ; Agricultural sector ; Development programmes ; Stakeholders ; Infrastructure ; Food security ; Nutrition ; Policy making ; Accountability ; Assessment ; Resource allocation ; Water governance / Africa
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048892)
(13.6 MB)
11 Dickens, Chris; Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso; Ndhlovu, Brown. 2019. Mainstreaming the Sustainable Development Goals in developing countries. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 23p. [doi: https://doi.org/10.5337/2019.212]
Sustainable Development Goals ; Mainstreaming ; Developing countries ; UN ; Development indicators ; Multi-stakeholder processes ; Public-private cooperation ; Partnerships ; Awareness raising ; Economic development ; Development policies ; National planning ; Government agencies ; Institutions ; Governance ; Financing ; Budgeting ; Monitoring ; Impact assessment ; Accountability ; Adaptability ; Risk assessment ; Strategies / Southern Africa / South Africa / Botswana / Malawi / Namibia / Eswatini / Zimbabwe
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049245)
(2.03 MB)
The United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development promises to achieve change in almost every aspect of life on Earth. Encompassing 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets, the Agenda marks the first time in history when all nations have agreed on how to chart their future. The SDGs are not just a global reporting exercise, however, but rather involve a global program that embraces country-led efforts. Guided by the ideas contained in the 2030 Agenda, each nation must seek to become more prosperous and sustainable, while contributing to the global effort at the same time. If all the countries achieve this, we will have a sustainable planet and a secure future for all.
This document offers guidance on how developing countries can adapt the SDGs to their own contexts and priorities. It indicates important areas for developing countries to consider when creating their own program to achieve the SDGs, and provides examples of success to demonstrate concrete possibilities for progress.
This document offers guidance on how developing countries can adapt the SDGs to their own contexts and priorities. It indicates important areas for developing countries to consider when creating their own program to achieve the SDGs, and provides examples of success to demonstrate concrete possibilities for progress.
12 Hofstetter, Moritz; Bolding, A.; van Koppen, Barbara. 2020. Addressing failed water infrastructure delivery through increased accountability and end-user agency: the case of the Sekhukhune District, South Africa. Water Alternatives, 13(3):843-863.
Water supply ; Infrastructure ; Water policy ; Public services ; Rural areas ; Local government ; Project planning ; Financing ; Investment ; Community involvement ; Political aspects ; Accountability ; Patronage / South Africa / Sekhukhune / Ga-Moela
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049943)
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol13/v13issue3/595-a13-3-13/file
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049943.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049943.pdf
(0.39 MB) (399 KB)
Despite progressive policies and a legal framework that includes the constitutional right to sufficient water, there are still enormous problems with water service delivery in low income rural South Africa. To understand the factors responsible for the observed discrepancy between ambitious policies and disappointing water service delivery, we undertook an analysis of the implementation of these policies in Sekhukhune District, South Africa; we scrutinised the public service water delivery in that district using an actor-oriented approach. We found that during the four phases of public water services delivery – identification, planning, construction and operation – practices often deviated from the stipulated policies; we also found that accountability relations between service delivery agencies and end users were undermined by gatekeeping and patronage. We argue that there is no need for major policy changes; we concluded from our research that by mobilising mechanisms that are based on existing policies, accountability relations can be strengthened and service delivery improved. We describe an experimental approach which focuses on budget transparency and end-user-driven development; it is an approach which aims at strengthening the agency of end users while limiting possibilities for rent-seeking and gatekeeping by councillors and contractors.
13 Ulimwengu, J. M.; Matchaya, Greenwell; Makombe, T.; Oehmke, J. 2020. Mutual accountability in African agricultural transformation. In Resnick, D.; Diao, X.; Tadesse, G. (Eds.). Sustaining Africa’s agrifood system transformation: the role of public policies. Washington, DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Kigali, Rwanda: AKADEMIYA2063. pp.182-194. (ReSAKSS Annual Trends and Outlook Report 2020) [doi: https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293946_15]
Agricultural sector ; Transformation ; Accountability ; Policies ; Multi-stakeholder processes ; Declarations ; Development programmes ; Investment ; Institutions ; Reforms ; Indicators ; Reviews / Africa / Malawi / Lesotho / Mozambique / Cote d'Ivoire / Niger / Togo
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050060)
https://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/134070/filename/134282.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050060.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050060.pdf
(0.17 MB) (172 KB)
This chapter aims to deepen our understanding of both the conceptual framework of mutual accountability and its best practices in the context of agricultural transformation in Africa. We do so in three ways: documenting the need for and growth of mutual accountability mechanisms over time, discussing how mutual accountability processes contribute to agricultural transformation, and examining the effectiveness of the mutual accountability processes of choice— JSRs and the African agricultural BR. In the next section, we provide a brief review of the origins and theory of mutual accountability as well as its application in African agriculture. Following that, we discuss how mutual accountability is being operationalized through JSRs and the Malabo BR, and the effectiveness of the two processes. The section after empirically assesses the contribution of mutual accountability to agricultural transformation in Africa. The final section provides concluding remarks for driving agricultural transformation through mutual accountability processes.
14 Rayner, T.; Oberthur, S.; Hermwille, L. 2021. A sectoral perspective on international climate governance: key findings and research priorities. Earth System Governance, 11p. (Online first) [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100105]
Climate change ; Governance ; International agreements ; UNFCCC ; Sectoral analysis ; International organizations ; Institutions ; Policies ; Financing ; Political aspects ; Accountability ; Standards ; Technology
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050343)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000094/pdfft?md5=6f26d784e734e215e5b0cee58c896f90&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000094-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050343.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050343.pdf
(1.05 MB) (1.05 MB)
This concluding article derives six major findings from the contributions to this special issue. First, the barriers and challenges to decarbonisation vary significantly across sectoral systems. Second, and similarly, the need and potential for the five functions of international governance institutions to contribute to effective climate protection also vary widely. Third, while the pattern is uneven, there is a general undersupply of international climate governance. Fourth, the sectoral analyses confirm that the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement play an important overarching role but remain limited in advancing effective sectoral governance. Fifth, while non-environmental institutions may present important barriers to decarbonisation, more synergistic effects are possible. Sixth, our sectoral approach provides a sound basis on which to identify sector-specific policy options. The paper then offers reflections on the merits and limitations of the sectoral approach, before identifying avenues for future research to further advance the agenda.
15 Hofstetter, Moritz; van Koppen, Barbara; Bolding, A. 2021. The emergence of collectively owned self-supply water supply systems in rural South Africa – what can we learn from the Tshakhuma case in Limpopo? Water SA, 47(2):253-263. [doi: https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i2.10921]
Water supply ; Collective ownership ; Community involvement ; Rural areas ; Institutions ; Governance ; Investment ; Accountability ; Infrastructure ; Water users ; Water quality ; Households ; Case studies / South Africa / Limpopo / Tshakhuma
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050441)
(0.79 MB) (805 KB)
Despite the rapid extension of public service delivery since the end of Apartheid, many rural citizens in South Africa still rely on their own initiatives and infrastructure to access water. They construct, improve, operate and maintain infrastructure of different complexities, from individual wells to complex collectively owned water schemes. While most of these schemes operate without legal recognition, they provide essential services to many households. In this article we will first provide an overview of the growing international body of literature describing self-supply as an alternative pathway for public service delivery. We then take a historical perspective on the role of communities and self-supply in South Africa and describe the emergence of six collectively owned, gravity-fed, piped schemes in Tshakhuma, Limpopo Province. We describe and compare these systems using key characteristics like resource access, investment, construction, operation, maintenance and institutional governance. We further assess their performance with regard to coverage, service level, reliability, governance structure, accountability and water quality. We do so because we are convinced that lessons learned from studying such schemes as locally adapted prototypes have the potential to improve public approaches to service delivery. The described cases show the willingness of community members to engage with service delivery and their ability to provide services in cases where the state has failed. The assessment also highlights problematic aspects of self-supply related to a lack of accountability, technical expertise and the exclusion of disadvantaged community members. By describing and assessing the performance of rural self-supply schemes, we aim to recognize, study and learn from such schemes. We consequently do not conclude this article by providing answers, but by raising some pertinent, policy-relevant questions.
16 Matchaya, Greenwell; Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso; Panduleni, E.; Greffiths, Ikhothatseng; Fakudze, Bhekiwe. 2021. Africa Agriculture Transformation Scorecard: performance and lessons. Southern African Development Community (SADC). Pretoria, South Africa: Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-SA); Kigali, Rwanda: AKADEMIYA2063. 8p. (2019 Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Biennial Review Brief)
Agricultural development ; Agricultural sector ; SADC countries ; Policies ; Declarations ; Indicators ; Agricultural trade ; Financing ; Accountability ; Poverty
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050442)
https://www.resakss.org/sites/default/files/Biennial-review-SADC_0.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050442.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050442.pdf
(0.44 MB) (454 KB)
This brief highlights the SADC region’s performance in the second BR and analyzes challenges faced and lessons learned by the region. The brief also reviews policy and programmatic changes in the SADC region induced by lessons from the inaugural 2017 and concludes by highlighting required policy actions for SADC to meet Malabo commitments by 2025.
17 Mbuyisa, H.; Fakudze, Bhekiwe; Matchaya, Greenwell; Mndawe, H.; Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso; Greffiths, Ikhothatseng. 2021. Africa Agriculture Transformation Scorecard: performance and lessons. Eswatini. Pretoria, South Africa: Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-SA); Kigali, Rwanda: AKADEMIYA2063. 8p. (2019 Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Biennial Review Brief)
Agricultural development ; Declarations ; Indicators ; Accountability ; Agricultural trade ; Policies ; SADC countries / Eswatini
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050443)
https://www.resakss.org/sites/default/files/Biennial%20Review%20Brief_Eswatini.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050443.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050443.pdf
(0.40 MB) (408 KB)
This brief highlights Eswatini’s performance in the second BR and assesses challenges faced and lessons learned by the country during the review process. The brief also reviews policy and programmatic changes in Eswatini that can be attributed to the first (2017) and second BRs. It concludes by highlighting required policy actions for Eswatini to implement to meet the Malabo Commitments by 2025.
18 Kibonilwe, D.; Fakudze, Bhekiwe; Matchaya, Greenwell; Baemedi, G. D.; Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso; Greffiths, Ikhothatseng. 2021. Africa Agriculture Transformation Scorecard: performance and lessons. Botswana. Pretoria, South Africa: Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-SA); Kigali, Rwanda: AKADEMIYA2063. 6p. (2019 Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Biennial Review Brief)
Agricultural development ; Declarations ; Indicators ; Accountability ; Policies ; Investment ; SADC countries / Botswana
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050444)
https://www.resakss.org/sites/default/files/Biennial-Review%20Brief%20Botswana.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050444.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050444.pdf
(1.00 MB) (1.00 MB)
This brief highlights Botswana’s performance in the second BR and assesses challenges faced and lessons learned by the country during the review. The brief also reviews policy and programmatic changes in Botswana which can be attributed to the first (2017) and second BRs and concludes by highlighting required policy actions for Botswana to meet the Malabo commitments by 2025.
19 Vilissa, D.; Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso; Matchaya, Greenwell; Wilson, D.; Greffiths, Ikhothatseng; Fakudze, Bhekiwe. 2021. Africa Agriculture Transformation Scorecard: performance and lessons. Mozambique. Pretoria, South Africa: Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-SA); Kigali, Rwanda: AKADEMIYA2063. 10p. (2019 Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Biennial Review Brief)
Agricultural development ; Declarations ; Indicators ; Agricultural trade ; Policies ; Accountability ; Investment ; SADC countries / Mozambique
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050445)
https://www.resakss.org/sites/default/files/Biennial%20Review%20Brief_Mozambique.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050445.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050445.pdf
(0.49 MB) (503 KB)
This brief highlights Mozambique’s performance in the second BR and assesses challenges faced and lessons learned by the country during the review. The brief also reviews policy and programmatic changes in Mozambique that can be attributed to the first (2017) and second BRs. It concludes by highlighting required policy actions for Mozambique to implement to meet the Malabo Commitments by 2025.
20 Greffiths, Ikhothatseng; Matchaya, Greenwell; Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso; Fakudze, Bhekiwe. 2021. Africa Agriculture Transformation Scorecard: performance and lessons. Mauritius. Pretoria, South Africa: Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-SA); Kigali, Rwanda: AKADEMIYA2063. 8p. (2019 Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Biennial Review Brief)
Agricultural development ; Declarations ; Indicators ; Accountability ; Policies ; Agricultural trade ; Financing ; Poverty ; SADC countries / Mauritius
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050446)
https://www.resakss.org/sites/default/files/Biennial-Review-Mauritius_0.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050446.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050446.pdf
(0.42 MB) (431 KB)
This brief highlights Mauritius’ performance in the second BR and assesses challenges faced and lessons learned by the Mauritius during the review. The brief also reviews policy and programmatic changes in Mauritius which can be attributed to the first (2017) and second BRs and concludes by highlighting required policy actions for Mauritius to meet the Malabo commitments by 2025.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
