Your search found 6 records
1 Sullivan, C. A.; Meigh, J. R.; Giacomello, A. M.; Fediw, T.; Lawrence, P.; Samad, M.; Mlote, S.; Hutton, C.; Allan, J. A.; Schulze, R. E.; Dlamini, D. J. M.; Cosgrove, W.; Priscoli, J. D.; Gleick, P.; Smout, I.; Cobbing, J.; Calow, R.; Hunt, C.; Hussain, A.; Acreman, M. C.; King, J.; Malomo, S.; Tate, E. L.; O’Regan, D.; Milner, S.; Steyl, I. 2003. The water poverty index: development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, 27(3):189-199.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H032686)
2 Sullivan, C. A.. 2006. Do investments and policy interventions reach the poorest of the poor? In Rogers, P. P.; Llamas, M. R.; Martinez-Cortina, L. (Eds.). Water crisis: myth or reality?: Marcelino Botin Water Forum 2004. London, UK: Taylor and Francis. pp.221-231.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 ROG Record No: H042014)
3 Sullivan, C. A.. 2009. Poverty and the ethics of water development. In Llamas, M. R.; Martinez-Cortina, L.; Mukherji, Aditi. (Eds.). Water ethics: Marcelino Botin Water Forum 2007. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC Press. pp.129-149.
Water poverty ; Indicators ; Water resource management ; Ethics ; Poverty ; Health ; Virtual water ; Economic development ; Water use ; River basins ; International waters
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 LLA Record No: H042077)
4 Vorosmarty, C. J.; McIntyre, P. B.; Gessner, M. O.; Dudgeon, D.; Prusevich, A.; Green, P.; Glidden, S.; Bunn, S. E.; Sullivan, C. A.; Liermann, C. R.; Davies, P. M. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467:555-561. [doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature09440]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H043790)
(2.65 MB)
Protecting the world’s freshwater resources requires diagnosing threats over a broad range of scales, fromglobal to local. Here we present the first worldwide synthesis to jointly consider human and biodiversity perspectives on water security using a spatial framework that quantifies multiple stressors and accounts for downstream impacts. We find that nearly 80% of the world’s population is exposed to high levels of threat to water security. Massive investment in water technology enables rich nations to offset high stressor levels without remedying their underlying causes, whereas less wealthy nations remain vulnerable. A similar lack of precautionary investment jeopardizes biodiversity, with habitats associated with 65% of continental discharge classified as moderately to highly threatened. The cumulative threat framework offers a tool for prioritizing policy and management responses to this crisis, and underscores the necessity of limiting threats at their source instead of through costly remediation of symptoms in order to assure global water security for both humans and freshwater biodiversity.
5 Vorosmarty, C. J.; McIntyre, P. B.; Gessner, M. O.; Dudgeon, D.; Prusevich, A.; Green, P.; Glidden, S.; Bunn, S. E.; Sullivan, C. A.; Reidy Liermann, C. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467:555-562. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09549]
Water security ; Rivers ; Biodiversity ; Ecosystems ; Environmental effects ; Frameworks ; Water resources development ; Maps
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H044244)
(2.65 MB)
Protecting the world’s freshwater resources requires diagnosing threats over a broad range of scales, fromglobal to local. Here we present the first worldwide synthesis to jointly consider human and biodiversity perspectives on water security using a spatial framework that quantifies multiple stressors and accounts for downstream impacts. We find that nearly 80% of the world’s population is exposed to high levels of threat to water security. Massive investment in water technology enables rich nations to offset high stressor levels without remedying their underlying causes, whereas less wealthy nations remain vulnerable. A similar lack of precautionary investment jeopardizes biodiversity, with habitats associated with 65% of continental discharge classified as moderately to highly threatened. The cumulative threat framework offers a tool for prioritizing policy and management responses to this crisis, and underscores the necessity of limiting threats at their source instead of through costly remediation of symptoms in order to assure global water security for both humans and freshwater biodiversity.
6 Vollmer, D.; Shaad, K.; Souter, N. J.; Farrell, T.; Dudgeon, D.; Sullivan, C. A.; Fauconnier, I.; MacDonald, G. M.; McCartney, Matthew P.; Power, A. G.; McNally, A.; Andelman, S. J.; Capon, T.; Devineni, N.; Apirumanekul, C.; Nam Ng, C.; Shaw, M. R.; Wang, R. Y.; Lai, C.; Wang, Z.; Regan, H. M. 2018. Integrating the social, hydrological and ecological dimensions of freshwater health: the freshwater health index. Science of the Total Environment, 627:304-313. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.040]
Freshwater ; Water governance ; Stakeholders ; Ecosystem services ; Ecological factors ; Water security ; Water resources ; Water management ; Water demand ; Sustainability ; Environmental health ; Indicators ; River basins / China / Dongjiang River Basin
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048519)
https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0048969718300421/1-s2.0-S0048969718300421-main.pdf?_tid=f9ece1d2-1aa6-11e8-bd92-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1519616689_e389c8dbeceef2e477e95bff7632ec3f
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H048519.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H048519.pdf
(1.55 MB)
Degradation of freshwater ecosystems and the services they provide is a primary cause of increasing water insecurity, raising the need for integrated solutions to freshwater management. While methods for characterizing the multi-faceted challenges of managing freshwater ecosystems abound, they tend to emphasize either social or ecological dimensions and fall short of being truly integrative. This paper suggests that management for sustainability of freshwater systems needs to consider the linkages between human water uses, freshwater ecosystems and governance. We present a conceptualization of freshwater resources as part of an integrated social-ecological system and propose a set of corresponding indicators to monitor freshwater ecosystem health and to highlight priorities for management. We demonstrate an application of this new framework —the Freshwater Health Index (FHI) — in the Dongjiang River Basin in southern China, where stakeholders are addressing multiple and conflicting freshwater demands. By combining empirical and modeled datasets with surveys to gauge stakeholders' preferences and elicit expert information about governance mechanisms, the FHI helps stakeholders understand the status of freshwater ecosystems in their basin, how ecosystems are being manipulated to enhance or decrease water-related services, and how well the existing water resource management regime is equipped to govern these dynamics over time. This framework helps to operationalize a truly integrated approach to water resource management by recognizing the interplay between governance, stakeholders, freshwater ecosystems and the services they provide.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
