Your search found 22 records
1 Perry, C. J.. 1995. Determinants of function and dysfunction in irrigation performance, and implications for performance improvement. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 11(1):25-38.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 3779, PER Record No: H016385)
(1.17 MB)
This paper suggests definitions of three elements essential to successful irrigation - water rights, infrastructure capable of delivering the service implied in the water right, and assigned operational responsibilities. Depending on whether the basic elements are promptly matched, systems are defined as 'functional' or 'dysfunctional.' The importance of interactions among these factors is illustrated through field examples. It is argued that performance analysis of dysfunctional systems is problematic, and functionality may be a prerequisite to significant improvements in performance. The definition of water rights, particularly as undocumented and unregulated usage develops, is likely to present the most difficult challenge to achieving functionality.
2 Perry, C. J.. 1996. Alternative approaches to cost sharing for water service to agriculture in Egypt. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI). iii, 15p. (IWMI Research Report 002 / IIMI Research Report 002) [doi: https://doi.org/10.3910/2009.015]
(Location: IWMI-India Call no: IIMI 631.7.4 G232 PER Record No: H018207)
(281KB)
Combines and interprets results from a number of studies that were designed to help the Egyptian government formulate a rational approach to sharing the costs of water services among the beneficiaries-agriculture and other users-and government. Highlights lessons transferable to other countries.
3 Perry, C. J.. 1996. The IIMI water balance framework: a model for project level analysis. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI). 18p. (IWMI Research Report 005 / IIMI Research Report 005) [doi: https://doi.org/10.3910/2009.007]
(Location: IWMI-India Call no: IIMI 631.7.1 G000 PER Record No: H019241)
(808KB)
Outlines the IWMI Water Balance Framework, which identifies sources, uses and reuses of water. The framework will be of interest to those involved in the design of irrigation projects and in the formulation of improvements to existing infrastructure of operational rules. Managers of irrigation projects will also find it useful for interpreting water use efficiency, or for identifying interventions to improve the efficiency and sustainability of their projects.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.4 G000 PER, 333.91 G000 KAY Record No: H021492)
(408KB)
Discusses the potential opportunities and pitfalls of introducing market forces into the process of water allocation. Proposes several preconditions for beneficial privatization of water allocation and argues for a more sophisticated form of analysis than that generally allowed by proponents of basic needs or of free market approaches.
5 Molden, D. J.; Sakthivadivel, R.; Perry, C. J.; de Fraiture, C. 1997. Indicators for comparing performance of irrigated agricultural systems. In IIMI; ILRI; INA–CRA; IHE; UNC. International seminar: Research Program on Irrigation Performance (RPIP), Mendoza, Argentina, 3-7 November 1997. Papers presented. [Vol.1]. 15p. + annex.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.8 G000 IIM Record No: H021661)
(1.08 MB)
6 Perry, C. J.. 1996. A framework for the analysis of water balances at project level. Draft report. 10p. + annexes.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.1 G000 PER Record No: H021678)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.8 G000 MOL Record No: H022308)
(990KB)
Outlines IWMI's external and other comparative performance indicators that allow for analysis of irrigation performance across systems. The purpose of these indicators is to understand the current situation with respect to productive utilization of land and water, to compare relative performance of systems, and to identify where performance can be improved.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.3 G000 PER Record No: H022447)
(293KB)
Explores the theoretical and actual responses of farmers faced with irrigation supplies that are limited in relation to available land and labor resources, and where the actual schedule and available volume for delivery are uncertain.
9 Merrey, D. J.; Perry, C. J.. 1999. New Directions in water research: IWMI at the threshold of the twenty-first century. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 15(1/2):5-16.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: PER Record No: H024202)
(0.19 MB)
10 Bastiaanssen, W. G. M.; Perry, C. J.. 2000. Earth observation demands for improved water resources management. In Verstraete, M. M.; Menenti, M.; Peltoniemi, J. (Eds.), Observing land from space: Science, customers and technology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp.105-117.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 621.3678 G000 VER, IIMI 621.3678 G000 BAS Record No: H026881)
11 Perry, C. J.. 2001. Charging for irrigation water: the issues and options, with a case study from Iran. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). v, 17p. (IWMI Research Report 052) [doi: https://doi.org/10.3910/2009.057]
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.4 G690 PER Record No: H027766)
(161KB)
Inadequate funding for maintenance of irrigation works and emerging shortages of water are prevalent. The use of water charges to generate resources for maintenance and to reduce demand is widely advocated. Examples from other utilities, and from the domestic/industrial sectors of water supply suggest the approach could be effective. In developing countries, the facilities required for measured and controlled delivery of irrigation are rarely in place, and would require a massive investment in physical, legal and administrative infrastructure. To be effective in curtailing demand, the marginal price of water must be significant. The price levels required to cover operation and maintenance (O&M) costs are too low to have a substantial impact on demand, much less to actually bring supply and demand into balance. On the other hand, the prices required to control demand are unlikely to be within the politically feasible range. Furthermore, water supplied is a proper measure of service in domestic and industrial uses. But in irrigation, and especially as the water resource itself becomes constrained, water consumption is the appropriate unit for water accounting. This is exceptionally difficult to measure. An alternative approach to cope with shortage would focus on assigning volumes to specific uses—effectively rationing water where demand exceeds supply. This approach has a number of potential benefits including simplicity, transparency, and the potential to tailor allocations specifically to hydrological situations, particularly where salinity is a problem. Data from Iran are presented to support these contentions.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.6.2 G000 ALB Record No: H029685)
(1.71MB)
This study uses both farmer surveys and physical measurements to understand the impact RCTs have had on water use and water savings in the irrigated Rice-Wheat Zone of Pakistan's Punjab province. The findings show that field scale water savings achieved from RCTs is not necessarily equivalent to water savings at broader scales and may even result in an increase in overall water depletion.
13 Perry, C. J.. 2003. Role of water pricing in irrigation: The example of India. In Prasad, K. (Ed.), Water resources and sustainable development: Challenges of 21st Century. Delhi, India: Shipra Publications. pp.362-368.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 PRA Record No: H031081)
14 Perry, C. J.. 2004. Non-state actors and water resources development: An economic perspective. Draft report. 10p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 6978 Record No: H035201)
15 Hellegers, P. J. G. J.; Perry, C. J.. 2004. Water as an economic good in irrigated agriculture: Theory and practice. The Hague, Netherlands: Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI) iv, 152p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G000 HEL Record No: H037612)
16 Perry, C. J.. 1999. The IWMI water resources paradigm: Definitions and implications. Agricultural Water Management, 40(1):45-50.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H024082)
17 Hellegers, P. J. G. J.; Perry, C. J.. 2006. Can irrigation water use be guided by market forces?: Theory and practice. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22(1):79-86.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H038383)
18 de Fraiture, Charlotte; Perry, C. J.. 2007. Why is agricultural water demand unresponsive at low price ranges? In Molle, Francois; Berkoff, J. (Eds.). Irrigation water pricing: the gap between theory and practice. Wallingford, UK: CABI. pp.94-107. (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 4)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.4 G000 MOL Record No: H040602)
19 Hellegers, P. J. G. J.; Perry, C. J.; Berkoff, J. 2007. Water pricing in Haryana, India. In Molle, Francois; Berkoff, J. (Eds.). Irrigation water pricing: the gap between theory and practice. Wallingford, UK: CABI. pp.192-207. (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 4)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.4 G000 MOL Record No: H040607)
20 Hellegers, Petra J. G. J.; Perry, C. J.; Petitguyot, T. 2007. Water pricing in Tadla, Morocco. In Molle, Francois; Berkoff, J. (Eds.). Irrigation water pricing: the gap between theory and practice. Wallingford, UK: CABI. pp.262-276. (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 4)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.4 G000 MOL Record No: H040609)
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from