Your search found 13 records
1 Sahn, D. E.; Haddad, L.. 1991. The gendered impacts of structural adjustment programs in Africa: Discussion. Publication of American Agricultural Economics Association, December 1991. pp.1448-1451. (IFPRI reprint no.243)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 2550 Record No: H011799)
2 Haddad, L.; Reardon, T. 1993. Gender bias in the allocation of resources within households in Burkina Faso: A disaggregated outlay equivalent analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 29(2):260-276. (IFPRI reprint no.262)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 2722 Record No: H012498)
3 Alderman, H.; Haddad, L.; Hoddinott, J.; Vosti, S. A. 1994. Strengthening agricultural and natural resource policy through intrahousehold analysis: An introduction. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(5):1208-1212. (IFPRI reprint no.304)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 3857 Record No: H016819)
4 Hopkins, J.; Levin, C.; Haddad, L.. 1994. Women's income and household expenditure patterns: Gender of flow? Evidence from Niger. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(5):1219-1225. (IFPRI reprint no.304)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 3857 Record No: H016820)
5 Haddad, L.; Westbrook, M. D.; Driscoll, D.; Payongayong, E.; Rozen, J.; Weeks, M. 1995. Strengthening policy analysis: Econometric tests using microcomputer software. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI. viii, 157p. + floppy disk. (Microcomputers in policy research no.2)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 001.6425 G000 HAD Record No: H017083)
6 Udry, C.; Hoddinott, J.; Alderman, H.; Haddad, L.. 1995. Gender differentials in farm productivity: Implications for household efficiency and agricultural policy. Food Policy, 20(5):407-423. (IFPRI reprint no.333)
Gender differences ; Women in development ; Farmers ; Agricultural policy ; Farm management ; Productivity ; Households / Africa / Burkina Faso
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 4328 Record No: H019083)
Also published in Quisumbing, A. R.(Ed.), Household decisions, gender, and development: A synthesis of recent research. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI.pp.61-66.
7 Engle, P. L.; Menon, P.; Haddad, L.. 1997. Care and nutrition: Concepts and measurement. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI. vi, 50p. (IFPRI occasional papers)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 362.1 G000 ENG Record No: H021082)
8 Haddad, L.. (Ed.) 1997. Achieving food security in southern Africa: new challenges, new opportunities. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI. 334p. (IFPRI Occasional Papers)
Food security ; Food supply ; Agricultural economics ; Poverty ; Income generation ; Agricultural policy ; Land reform ; Economic situation ; Economic policy ; Rural development ; Agricultural development ; Water resources development ; Water supply ; Water allocation ; Water management ; Irrigation water ; Investment ; Case studies / South Africa / Africa South of Sahara / Zambia
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 338.19 G178 HAD Record No: H021372)
9 Meinzen-Dick, R.; Adato, M.; Haddad, L.; Hazell, P. 2003. Impacts of agricultural research on poverty: Findings of an integrated economic and social analysis. IFPRI. ii, 75p. (EPTD discussion paper no.111 / FCND discussion paper no.164)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 6854 Record No: H034581)
10 Smith, L. C.; Ramakrishnan, U.; Ndiaye, A.; Haddad, L.; Martorell, R. 2003. The importance of women’s status for child nutrition in developing countries. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI. xii, 164p. (IFPRI Research Report 131)
Women ; Woman’s status ; Public health ; Nutrition ; Households ; Decision making ; Indicators ; Gender ; Models ; Social aspects ; Economic aspects ; Developing countries
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 363.8 G000 SMI Record No: H035083)
11 Scoones, I.; Devereux, S.; Haddad, L.. 2005. Introduction: New directions for African agriculture. IDS Bulletin, 36(2):1-8.
Agricultural economics ; Green revolution ; Farmers ; Poverty ; Development aid ; Trade policy ; Agricultural policy / Africa
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 7380 Record No: H037257)
12 Pretty, J.; Sutherland, W. J.; Ashby, J.; Auburn, J.; Baulcombe, D.; Bell, M.; Bentley, J.; Bickersteth, S.; Brown, K.; Burke, J.; Campbell, H.; Chen, K.; Crowley, E.; Crute, I.; Dobbelaere, D.; Edwards-Jones, G.; Funes-Monzote, F.; Godfray, H. C. J.; Griffon, M.; Gypmantisiri, P.; Haddad, L.; Halavatau, S.; Herren, H.; Holderness, M.; Izac, A-M.; Jones, M.; Koohafkan, P.; Lal, R.; Lang, T.; McNeely, J.; Mueller, A.; Nisbett, N.; Noble, Andrew; Pingali, P.; Pinto, Y.; Rabbinge, R.; Ravindranath, N. H.; Rola, A.; Roling, N.; Sage, C.; Settle, W.; Sha, J. M.; Shiming, L.; Simons, T.; Smith, P.; Strzepeck, K.; Swaine, H.; Terry, E.; Tomich, T. P.; Toulmin, C.; Trigo, E.; Twomlow, S.; Vis, J. K.; Wilson, J.; Pilgrim, S. 2010. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4):219-236. [doi: https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.0534]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H043303)
(0.17 MB)
Despite a significant growth in food production over the past half-century, one of the most important challenges facing society today is how to feed an expected population of some nine billion by the middle of the 20th century. To meet the expected demand for food without significant increases in prices, it has been estimated that we need to produce 70–100 per cent more food, in light of the growing impacts of climate change, concerns over energy security, regional dietary shifts and the Millennium Development target of halving world poverty and hunger by 2015. The goal for the agricultural sector is no longer simply to maximize productivity, but to optimize across a far more complex landscape of production, rural development, environmental, social justice and food consumption outcomes. However, there remain significant challenges to developing national and international policies that support the wide emergence of more sustainable forms of land use and efficient agricultural production. The lack of information flow between scientists, practitioners and policy makers is known to exacerbate the difficulties, despite increased emphasis upon evidence-based policy. In this paper, we seek to improve dialogue and understanding between agricultural research and policy by identifying the 100 most important questions for global agriculture. These have been compiled using a horizon-scanning approach with leading experts and representatives of major agricultural organizations worldwide. The aim is to use sound scientific evidence to inform decision making and guide policy makers in the future direction of agricultural research priorities and policy support. If addressed, we anticipate that these questions will have a significant impact on global agricultural practices worldwide, while improving the synergy between agricultural policy, practice and research. This research forms part of the UK Government’s Foresight Global Food and Farming Futures project.
13 Haddad, L.. 2020. Viewpoint: a view on the key research issues that the CGIAR should lead on 2020-2030. Food Policy, 4p. (Online first) [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101824]
Research organizations ; International organizations ; CGIAR ; Research programmes ; Agricultural research for development ; Food systems ; Food consumption ; Nutrition ; Public health ; Income
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049484)
(1.82 MB)
How should the CGIAR's research programme be focused to make it as impactful as possible given the changes being faced by the world's population over the next 10 years? This viewpoint suggests a firm emphasis on research needed to unlock the potential of food systems to deliver improved nutrition, environmental sustainability and stronger livelihoods, with a focus on the tradeoffs and synergies therein.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
