Your search found 8 records
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H046531)
(2.99 MB) (2.98 MB)
2 Hildenbrand, Z. L.; Fontenot, B. E.; Carlton, D. D. Jr.; Schug, K. A. 2014. New perspectives on the effects of natural gas extraction on groundwater quality. In Grafton, R. Q.; Wyrwoll, P.; White, C.; Allendes, D. (Eds.). Global water: issues and insights. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University (ANU Press). pp.139-144.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H046556)
(0.19 MB)
3 Biswas, A. K.; Kirchherr, J. 2014. Shale gas for energy security in India: perspectives and constraints. In Grafton, R. Q.; Wyrwoll, P.; White, C.; Allendes, D. (Eds.). Global water: issues and insights. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University (ANU Press). pp.145-150.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H046557)
(0.09 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.79 G000 JAG Record No: H047354)
(1.62 MB) (1.62 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047524)
(0.63 MB)
The Great Artesian Basin (GAB) in Australia is one of the largest subterranean aquifer systems in the world. In this article we venture into the subterranean “resource environment”’ of the Great Artesian Basin and ask whether new insights can be provided by social analyses of the “vertical third dimension” in contemporary contests over water and coal seam gas. Our analysis makes use of a large number of publicly available submissions made to recent state and federal government inquiries, augmented with data obtained through ethnographic fieldwork among landholders in the coal seam gas fields of southern Queensland. We examine the contemporary contest in terms of ontological politics, and regard the underground as a challenging “socionature hybrid” in which the material characteristics, uses, and affordances of water and coal seam gas resources in the Great Artesian Basin are entangled with broader social histories, technologies, knowledge debates, and discursive contests.
6 Behling, I.; Bonifazi, E.; de Boer, F. 2017. Workbook for estimating operational GHG [Greenhouse Gas] emissions. Version 11. London, UK: UK Water Industry Research Limited (UKWIR). 17p. + CD. (UKWIR Report Ref. No. 17/CL/01/25)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 363.73874 G000 BEH Record No: H048497)
(0.28 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049213)
(4.58 MB)
Hydraulic fracturing operations are generating considerable discussion about their potential to contaminate aquifers tapped by domestic groundwater wells. Groundwater wells located closer to hydraulically fractured wells are more likely to be exposed to contaminants derived from on-site spills and well-bore failures, should they occur. Nevertheless, the proximity of hydraulic fracturing operations to domestic groundwater wells is unknown. Here, we analyze the distance between domestic groundwater wells (public and self-supply) constructed between 2000 and 2014 and hydraulically fractured wells stimulated in 2014 in 14 states. We show that 37% of all recorded hydraulically fractured wells stimulated during 2014 exist within 2 km of at least one recently constructed (2000–2014) domestic groundwater well. Furthermore, we identify 11 counties where most (>50%) recorded domestic groundwater wells exist within 2 km of one or more hydraulically fractured wells stimulated during 2014. Our findings suggest that understanding how frequently hydraulic fracturing operations impact groundwater quality is of widespread importance to drinking water safety in many areas where hydraulic fracturing is common. We also identify 236 counties where most recorded domestic groundwater wells exist within 2 km of one or more recorded oil and gas wells producing during 2014. Our analysis identifies hotspots where both conventional and unconventional oil and gas wells frequently exist near recorded domestic groundwater wells that may be targeted for further water-quality monitoring.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052293)
(0.68 MB)
Irrigation water is required for increased crop yield and production to satisfy global food demand. However, irrigation also has negative impacts, including the production of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from groundwater pumping. To lessen this environmental problem, management methods that minimize agricultural GHG emissions from groundwater pumping should be identified. This work aims to compare measures that decrease agricultural groundwater withdrawal GHG emissions. A comparison among different energy supply and demand management choices for groundwater pumping was made to identify the most effective measure. Results indicated that the best agricultural groundwater pumping energy management practices are affected by the type of pump (e.g., electric or natural gas operated) and for electric pumps, the electric grid energy mix (e.g., coal, natural gas, oil, wind, solar). Due to their higher operational pump efficiency (OPE), electric pumps consume less energy than natural gas pumps to extract an equal volume of groundwater under similar conditions. Nevertheless, natural gas pumps produce less GHG emissions than electric pumps using the US Central and Southern Plains electricity mix. Hence, groundwater pumping energy demand management through improving the OPE of natural gas pumps will save more GHG emissions (7600 kg CO2-eq year-1) than switching to electric pumps using the electricity mix applied to this study (2800 kg CO2-eq year-1). Additionally, switching to cleaner energy sources (wind and solar) can save significantly higher amounts of carbon than just improving OPE. This analysis can guide policymakers and individuals to assist in meeting global GHG emission reduction goals and targets while satisfying increasing food demand.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from