Your search found 3 records
1 Afzal, M.; Battilani, A.; Solimando, D.; Ragab, R. 2016. Improving water resources management using different irrigation strategies and water qualities: field and modelling study. Agricultural Water Management, 176:40-54. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.005]
Water resources ; Water management ; Water quality ; Irrigation methods ; Strategies ; Models ; Calibration ; Water deficit ; Freshwater ; Water productivity ; Wastewater irrigation ; Crop yield ; Maize ; Potatoes ; Soil moisture ; Soil salinity ; Rain ; Dry matter / Italy / Bologna
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047557)
(3.87 MB)
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two different irrigation strategies, regulated deficit irrigation, RDI and partial root drying, PRD using surface freshwater (SW) and brackish treated waste water (TWW) for maize and potato crops. The SALTMED model has been applied using the field measurements of two cropping seasons 2013 and 2014 at the Canale Emiliano Romagnolo, CER’s experimental farm located in Mezzolara di Budrio (Bologna, Italy). In 2013, PRD irrigated potato received 17% less irrigation water than RDI but produced nearly the same yield as under RDI. The water productivity, on average, was 11% higher for PRD compared with RDI. For maize 2014 season, the PRD strategy received almost 15% less irrigation water, but produced a yield only 6% lower than that of RDI and gave equal water productivity to RDI. Given that the two strategies received the same amount of rainfall the results favour the PRD over RDI. Had the site not received above average rainfall (258 mm in 2013 and 259 mm during the 2014 growing seasons), PRD might have produced higher yield and water productivity than RDI. In terms of model simulations, overall, the model showed a strong relationship between the observed and the simulated soil moisture and salinity profiles, total dry mater and final yields. This illustrates SALTMED model’s ability to simulate the dry matter and yield of C3 and C4 crops as well as to simulate different water qualities and different water application strategies. Therefore, the model can run with “what if” scenarios depicting several water qualities, crops and irrigation systems and strategies without the need to try them all in the field. This will reduce costs of labour and investment.
2 Rathore, V. S.; Nathawat, N. S.; Bhardwaj, S.; Sasidharan, R. P.; Yadav, B. M.; Kumar, M.; Santra, P.; Yadava, N. D.; Yadav, O. P. 2017. Yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of sprinkler irrigated wheat grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 187:232-245. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.031]
Irrigated farming ; Sprinkler irrigation ; Nitrogen ; Water use efficiency ; Crop yield ; Wheat ; Water deficit ; Water productivity ; Crop management ; Plant growth ; Plant water relations ; Yield components ; Harvest index ; Leaf area ; Dry matter ; Weather ; Arid zones / India / Rajasthan / Bikaner
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048147)
(1.61 MB)
A major challenge in crop production is to achieve the goal of increasing both yield and resource use efficiency. Irrigation water and nitrogen (N) are scarce and expensive resources constraining wheat production in arid regions. There is limited information on how irrigation and N supply can be simultaneously manipulated to achieve higher yield, water productivity (WP), and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of wheat in arid regions. A two-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of irrigation and N rates on yield, WP and NUE of wheat in a hot, arid environment at Bikaner, India. The experimental treatments comprised of six irrigation [100% (ETm; full evapotranspiration), 90% (ETd1), 80% (ETd2), 70% (ETd3), 60% (ETd4), and 50% (ETd5) of ETc (crop evapotranspiration)] levels, and four N [0 (N0), 40 (N40), 80 (N80), and 120 (N120) kg ha-1] rates. Moderate deficit irrigation (ETd2) had greatest WP and caused a 17% reduction in water consumption with only a 5% reduction in yield compared to full irrigation (ETm). The N application improved yield and WP. The NUE declined with a reduction in water application and an increase in N rates. The yield and WP response to N rates modified with irrigation levels. The signifi-cant increase in grain yield was recorded with N120 at ETm and ETd1, with N80 at ETd2 and ETd3, and with N40 at ETd4 and ETd5 irrigation levels. The significant increase in WP was recorded with N80 at ETm, ETd1, ETd2 and ETd3, and with N40 at ETd4 and ETd5 irrigation levels. The results suggested that moderate deficit irrigation (ETd2) along with 120 kg N ha-1 could ensure satisfactory grain yield and WP of wheat in arid regions. The study also indicated that the adoption of an appropriate deficit irrigation and N rate combination can be an effective means to reduce non-beneficial water consumption, achieve higher yield, and improve WP and NUE for wheat in an arid environment.
3 Hussein, M. A.; Riga, F. T.; Derseh, M. B.; Assefa, T. T.; Worqlul, A. W.; Haileslassie, Amare; Adie, A.; Jones, C. S.; Tilahun, Seifu A. 2024. Application of irrigation management and water-lifting technologies to enhance fodder productivity in smallholder farming communities: a case study in Robit Bata, Ethiopia. Agronomy, 14(5):1064. [doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14051064]
Irrigation management ; Water productivity ; Irrigation technology ; Smallholders ; Farmers ; Irrigation water ; Fodder ; Pennisetum purpureum ; Watersheds ; Labour productivity ; Dry matter ; Soil water content ; Livestock ; Case studies / Ethiopia / Robit Bata / Yinebo Watershed / Robit Watershed
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052854)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/5/1064/pdf?version=1715935300
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H052854.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H052854.pdf
(2.91 MB) (2.90 MB)
Small-scale cultivation of irrigated fodder is emerging as a vital production system in mixed farming communities. Efficient water management plays a key role in enhancing forage production, especially in the face of changing climate. A field-scale experimental study was conducted in Robit Bata kebele, Ethiopia, with the following objectives: (1) to examine the effects of conventional farmers’ irrigation scheduling versus climate-based irrigation scheduling; and (2) to assess the influence of water-lifting technologies (manual pulley and solar Majipump) on dry matter yield (DMY), water productivity (WP), irrigation labor productivity (ILP), and water productivity in terms of crude protein and metabolizable energy (WP.CP and WP.ME) of Napier grass. The experiment used 10 farmers’ plots each with a size of 100 m2 . Half of the plots were treated using farmers’ scheduling while the other half were treated using climate-based irrigation scheduling. Monitoring of irrigation water use and crop yield took place over two irrigation seasons from November 2020 to June 2021. Results showed there was an interaction effect of irrigation management (p = 0.019) and water-lifting technologies (p = 0.016) with season on DMY. The highest DMY occurred in the first irrigation season with climate-based scheduling and solar Majipump use. The interaction effect of irrigation management and season affected WP (p = 0.047). Climate-based scheduling had a higher WP in the first season, while farmers’ scheduling had a higher WP during the second season. On average, the solar Majipump outperformed the pulley, achieving 5 kg m-3 WP compared to the pulley’s 4 kg m-3 (p = 0.018). Emphasizing the seasonal impact, it is recommended to promote full irrigation (climate-based) in the first season for maximum yield and WP. Conversely, in the second season, advocating only deficit irrigation is advised due to water scarcity and sustainability concerns. Statistical parity in DMY and lower WP with full irrigation in the second season supports this recommendation, addressing the challenge of optimizing water use in the context of a changing climate and ensuring sustainable smallholder agriculture practices. Therefore, implementing appropriate irrigation management alongside efficient water-lifting technologies holds the potential to enhance fodder productivity and bolster smallholder farmers’ livelihoods. Future research should explore the comparative benefits of irrigated fodder versus other crops and the overall advantages of investing in irrigated fodder over vegetables.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
