Your search found 7 records
1 Haddad, M.; Bakir, A. 1998. An evaluation of public concerns about water management in the Palestinian territory pre, during, and post the national uprising. Water Resources Management, 12(5):359-374.
Water management ; Water quality ; Pollution control ; Political aspects ; Water availability ; Water allocation ; International cooperation / Middle East / Palestine / Israel / West Bank / Gaza Strip
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H023949)
2 Feitelson, E.; Haddad, M.. 1998. A stepwise open-ended approach to the identification of joint management structures for shared aquifers. Water International, 23(4):227-237.
Water resource management ; Aquifers ; Groundwater ; International cooperation ; Conflict ; Institution building / Middle East / Israel / Palestine
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H024012)
3 Haddad, M.. 1998. Planning water supply under complex and changing political conditions: Palestine as a case study. Water Policy, 1(2):177-192.
Water resource management ; Planning ; Policy ; Water supply ; Water demand ; Political aspects ; Institutions ; Infrastructure ; Case studies / Middle East / Palestine / West Bank / Gaza Strip / Israel
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 5141, PER Record No: H024363)
4 Haddad, M.. 1999. Institutional framework for regional cooperation in the development of water supply and demand in the Middle East. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(4):729-738.
Water supply ; Water demand ; Institution building ; Water management ; Water resources development ; International cooperation ; Water market ; Financing ; Constraints / Middle East / Turkey / Syria / Iraq / Lebanon / Israel / Palestine / Egypt / Sudan
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H025118)
5 Haddad, M.. 2004. Integrated water and waste management in rural areas in Palestine. In Jordan. Ministry of Water and Irrigation. Bridging the gap – International Water Demand Management Conference, Dead Sea, Jordan, 30 May – 3 June 200. Jordan. Ministry of Water and Irrigation.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: CD Col Record No: H037116)
6 Haddad, M.. 2005. Future water institutions in Palestine. Water Policy, 7(2):181-200.
Water resource management ; Institutional development ; Water supply ; Sanitation ; Water policy ; Local government ; Non-governmental organizations ; Constraints / Middle East / Palestine / West Bank / Gaza Strip
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H 37296)
7 Montanaro, G.; Nangia, V.; Gowda, P.; Mukhamedjanov, S.; Mukhamedjanov, A.; Haddad, M.; Yuldashev, Tulkun; Wu, W. 2021. Heat units-based potential yield assessment for cotton production in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 14(6):137-144. [doi: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20211406.4803]
Cotton ; Crop production ; Crop yield ; Yield gap ; Yield potential ; Assessment ; Heat units ; Climate variability ; Agriculture / Uzbekistan
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050907)
https://ijabe.org/index.php/ijabe/article/download/4803/pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050907.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H050907.pdf
(0.77 MB) (792 KB)
Cotton yields in Uzbekistan are significantly lower than those in similar agro-climatic regions, requiring the estimation of crop potential and baseline yield to track progress of production enhancement efforts. The current study estimated potential cotton development and baseline yield (maximum given no production constraints) using total heat units (THU) and potential cotton yield (PCY), respectively. Calculations were based on heat units (HU) for a 30-year (1984-2013) period. Long-term average THU and PCY, as well as PCY at three different exceedance probabilities (p=0.99, p=0.80, and p=0.75), were calculated for 21 selected weather stations across cotton-growing areas of Uzbekistan. After confirmation that the current planting date (April 15) is optimal, a comparison of THU with the accepted cotton production cutoff threshold (1444°C) suggested that areas with lower elevations and latitudes are more appropriate for cotton production. Yield gap analysis (relative difference between long-term average PCY and actual yields) confirmed that Uzbekistan cotton production is below potential, while the spatial distribution of yield gaps outlined where efforts should be targeted. Areas near the stations of Nukus, Kungrad, Chimbay, and Syrdarya should be further investigated as benefit/cost ratio is highest in these areas. A comparison between state-set yield targets and PCY values, taking into account climatic variability, suggested that all areas except Jaslyk, Nurata, and Samarkand have safe, appropriate targets. These results present a starting-point to aid in strategic actions for Uzbekistan cotton production improvement.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
