Your search found 3 records
1 Christen, E.; Khan, S.; van Meerveld, I.. 2002. Improving institutional arrangements for conjunctive water use in Australia: A case study of the Shepparton, Coleambally and Burdekin irrigation areas. In Qureshi, A. S.; Bhatti, A.; Jehangir, W. A. (Eds.), Sustaining surface and groundwater resources: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Conjunctive Water Management for Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture in South Asia, Lahore, Pakistan, April 16-17, 2002. Lahore, Pakistan: IWMI. pp.187-215.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.1 G570 QUR Record No: H031204)
(1.57)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.3 G922 CHR Record No: H026313)
3 Clark, M. P.; Luce, C. H.; AghaKouchak, A.; Berghuijs, W.; David, C. H.; Duan, Q.; Ge, S.; van Meerveld, I.; Zheng, C.; Parlange, M. B.; Tyler, S. W. 2021. Open science: open data, open models, …and open publications? Water Resources Research, 57(4):e2020WR029480. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029480]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H050359)
(0.19 MB)
This commentary explores the challenges and opportunities associated with a possible transition of Water Resources Research to a publication model where all articles are freely available upon publication (“Gold” open access). It provides a review of the status of open access publishing models, a summary of community input, and a path forward for AGU leadership. The decision to convert to open access is framed by a mix of finances and values. On the one hand, the challenge is to define who pays, and how, and what we can do to improve the affordability of publishing. On the other hand, the challenge is to increase the extent to which science is open and accessible. The next steps for the community include an incisive analysis of the financial feasibility of different cost models, and weighing the financial burden for open access against the desire to further advance open science.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from