Your search found 3 records
1 Rosenstock, T. S.; Nowak, A.; Girvetz, E. (Eds.) 2019. The climate-smart agriculture papers: investigating the business of a productive, resilient and low emission future. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen. 321p. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92798-5]
Climate-smart agriculture ; Climate change adaptation ; Resilience ; Emission ; Forecasting ; Sustainable agriculture ; Farming systems ; Crop production ; Varieties ; Drought tolerance ; Nutrition ; Seed production ; Soils ; Agroforestry ; Participatory approaches ; Public-private cooperation ; Stakeholders ; Smallholders ; Farmers ; Entrepreneurship ; Income ; Agricultural extension ; Innovation ; Supply chain ; Risks ; Uncertainty ; Models ; Policies ; Households ; Welfare ; Women ; Livestock ; Infectious diseases ; Rural finance ; Traditional methods ; Stress ; Religion ; Case studies / Africa / Angola / Zimbabwe / Ethiopia / Kenya / Mozambique / Tanzania / Uganda / Namibia / Planalto / Lushoto
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049125)
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-92798-5.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049125.pdf
(8.51 MB) (8.51 MB)

2 Rosenstock, T. S.; Lubberink, R.; Gondwe, S.; Manyise, T.; Dentoni, D. 2020. Inclusive and adaptive business models for climate-smart value creation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42:76-81. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.005]
Climate-smart agriculture ; Business models ; Sustainable Development Goals ; Climate change mitigation ; Decision making ; Stakeholders ; Private sector ; Enterprises
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049551)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343519300648/pdfft?md5=392bc0e1409a1c14b315a34628b4222f&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343519300648-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049551.pdf
(0.31 MB) (320 KB)
Climate-smart business models target multiple Sustainable Development Goals by fostering agricultural productivity, supporting farm and farmer livelihood resilience, and encouraging climate mitigation. While many business models (cl)aiming to create climate-smart value already exist both in agricultural development and business practice, little scholarly attention has so far been directed toward their functioning. In this paper, we argue that business models need to be inclusive and adaptive to generate climate-smart value equitably for all stakeholders involved and sustainably over time. Inclusivity involves not only providing the poor at the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid (BoP) with access to resources (e.g. finance, technology, access to markets) in business models but also, according to some scholars, with guaranteeing their representation in decision-making over the use of these resources. Adaptability entails the capacity to smoohtly adjust structures and processes of enterprise-BoP partnerships that underlie business models. We suggest that building inclusive and adaptive climate-smart business models is non-trivial work which, in the future, will require rapid cycles of collective experimentation and reflection between decision-makers in climate-smart business models and researchers studying them.

3 Jones, K.; Nowak, A.; Berglund, E.; Grinnell, W.; Temu, E.; Paul, B.; Renwick, L. L. R.; Steward, P.; Rosenstock, T. S.; Kimaro, A. A. 2023. Evidence supports the potential for climate-smart agriculture in Tanzania. Global Food Security, 36:100666. (Online first) [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100666]
Climate-smart agriculture ; Mitigation ; Adaptation ; Socioeconomic aspects ; Resilience ; Food security ; Semiarid zones ; Agroecological zones ; Agroforestry ; Livestock ; Intercropping ; Crop management ; Water management ; Conservation agriculture ; Greenhouse gas emissions ; Gender ; Soil management ; Agricultural productivity / United Republic of Tanzania / Africa South of Sahara
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H051613)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H051613.pdf
(1.21 MB)
National governments across Sub-Saharan Africa include climate-smart agriculture (CSA)—context-specific interventions that support resilience, productivity, and climate mitigation—in plans, policies, and strategies to jointly address climate change, agricultural production, and rural livelihood goals. This paper synthesizes the evidence on field-based CSA management practices generated through ten years of research led by the CGIAR in Tanzania. Results show consistent positive impacts of CSA on productivity, mixed impacts on resilience, short-term negative impacts on emissions intensity, and highly variable impacts on socioeconomic characteristics. Tanzania provides an example of how an agriculturally diverse country can use evidence of impacts, synergies, and tradeoffs to prioritize CSA activities for sustainable development.

Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from Inmagic WebPublisher PRO