Your search found 11 records
1 Singh, G.; Dagar, J. C. 2005. Greening sodic lands: Bichhian model. Karnal, India: Central Soil Salinity Research Institute. 51p. (CSSRI Technical Bulletin No. 2/2005)
Soil properties ; Biomass ; Forest trees ; Fruit trees ; Grasses ; Irrigation requirements ; Land use ; Silviculture
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.5 G00 SIN Record No: H038815)

2 Johnson, P.; Johnstone, R. 1995. Productivity and nutrient dynamics of tropical sea-grass communities in Puttalam Lagoon, Sri Lanka. Ambio, 24(7/8):411-417.
Grasses ; Lagoons ; Ecosystems ; Fish ; Effluents ; Salinity / Sri Lanka / Puttalam Lagoon
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 7550 Record No: H038902)

3 Qadir, Manzoor; Oster, J. D.; Schubert, S.; Murtaza, G. 2006. Vegetative bioremediation of sodic and saline-sodic soils for productivity enhancement and environment conservation. In Ozturk, M.; Waisel, Y.; Khan, M. A.; Gork, G. (Eds.). Biosaline agriculture and salinity tolerance in plants. pp.137-146.
Soil management ; Soil salinity ; Sodic soils ; Bioremediation ; Irrigation management ; Grasses ; Wheat ; Millets ; Crop rotation
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.4 G000 QAD Record No: H039759)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H039759.pdf

4 de Rouw, Anneke; Douillet, M.; Tjiantahosong, H.; Ribolzi, Olivier; Thiebaux, Jean-Pierre. 2007. Dispersal of weed seeds by erosion and flow processes in upland fields. In Gebbie, L.; Glendinning, A.; Lefroy-Braun, R.; Victor, M. (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Sloping Lands and Watershed Management: Linking Research to Strengthen upland Policies and Practices, National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute of Lao PDR (NAFRI), Vientiane, Lao PDR, 2007. Vientiane, LAO PDR: National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute of Lao PDR (NAFRI) pp.156-166.
Erosion ; Seeds ; Weeds ; Grasses ; Rice ; Shifting cultivation ; Catchment areas / Laos / Houay Pano Catchment
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 708 ROW Record No: H041519)
http://www.nafri.org.la/documents/SSLWM/SSLWMpapers/chapter2/ch2_04_derouw.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H041519.pdf

5 Miththapala, S. 2008. Seagrasses and sand dunes. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group Asia. 36p. (Coastal Ecosystems Series, Vol.3)
Coastal area ; Ecosystems ; Ecology ; Vegetation ; Grasses
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 577.51 G000 MIT Record No: H041560)

6 Devi, M. G.; Samad, Madar. 2008. Wastewater treatment and reuse: an institutional analysis for Hyderabad, India. In Kumar, M. Dinesh (Ed.). Managing water in the face of growing scarcity, inequity and declining returns: exploring fresh approaches. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Partners Meet, IWMI TATA Water Policy Research Program, ICRISAT, Patancheru, Hyderabad, India, 2-4 April 2008. Vol.1. Hyderabad, India: International Water Management Institute (IWMI), South Asia Sub Regional Office. pp.513-523.
River basins ; Water pollution ; Sewage ; Effluents ; Pollution control ; Legislation ; Waste management ; Water quality ; Guidelines ; Wastewater irrigation ; Health hazards ; Rice ; Grasses ; Institutional reform ; Case studies / India / Hyderabad / Musi River
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7 G635 KUM Record No: H041888)
https://publications.iwmi.org/PDF/H041888.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/PDF/H041888.pdf
(0.12 MB)

7 Gayathri Devi, M.; Buechler, S. 2009. Gender dimensions of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Hyderabad, India. In Hovorka, A.; de Zeeuw, H.; Njenga, M. (Eds). Women feeding cities: mainstreaming gender in urban agriculture and food security. Warwickshire, UK: Practicle Action Publishing. pp.35-50.
Gender ; Analysis ; Labor ; Farmers ; Women ; Urban agriculture ; Suburban agriculture ; Community involvement ; Social aspects ; Wastewater irrigation ; Grasses ; Milk production ; Vegetables / India / Hyderabad / Kachiguda / Pirzadiguda / Parvathapuram / Musi River
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 338 G000 HOR Record No: H042152)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H042152.pdf
(4.21 MB)

8 Qureshi, Asad Sarwar; Sarwar, A. 2009. Managing salinity in the Indus Basin of Pakistan. International Journal of River Basin Management, 7(2):111-117.
River basin management ; Salinity control ; Irrigated farming ; Canals ; Soil salinity ; Sodic soils ; Soil reclamation ; Biological control ; Grasses ; Fodder ; Water table ; Effluents ; Tube wells ; Irrigation programs ; Groundwater recharge ; Water quality ; Drainage / Pakistan / Indus Basin
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H042213)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H042213.pdf
(0.76 MB)
Waterlogging and salinity have plagued irrigated agriculture in the Indus Basin for the past 30–40 years. Approximately 6 million ha (35–40% of total irrigated area) experience these twin problems. As a result, the production potential of the Indus Basin has been reduced by 25%. Over the last 40 years, the Government of Pakistan has adopted engineering, reclamation, and biological measures to address these problems. Part of the engineering solution involved large-scale Salinity Control and Reclamation Projects (SCARPs) in all four provinces. The program covered 8 million ha and cost approximately US$2 billion. Two big disposal projects were also initiated to solve the drainage disposal problems. To address the saline soil problem, some of the measures tested include leaching of salts by excess irrigation, use of chemicals (such as gypsum and acids), and addition of organic matter and biological measures (such as salt-tolerant plants, grasses, and shrubs). The success of these initiatives has been limited: 35–40% of irrigated land still suffers from high water tables and moderate to severe salinity. Lack of coordination among federal and provincial governments, research institutes, and national and international organizations; conventional farming and irrigation methods used by farmers; limited attention to reclamation and saline agricultural approaches; and lack of resources are some of the reasons for the low success rate. A more concerted effort that includes a greater focus on saline agriculture, capacity building of farmers, and promotion of local interventions to improve self-reliance is necessary for the management of salinity in the Indus Basin. A sustainable solution would also require coordination among different provinces and strengthening of federal and provincial government agencies.

9 Ward, R. C. 1967. Principles of hydrology. 2nd ed. Boston, UK: McGraw-Hill. 367p.
Hydrological cycle ; Precipitation ; Storms ; Rainfall patterns ; Snow ; Interception ; Vegetation ; Woodlands ; Grasses ; Crops ; Water balance ; Water quality ; Evaporation ; Meteorological factors ; Radiation ; Temperature ; Humidity ; Winds ; Soil moisture ; Evapotranspiration ; Infiltration water ; Groundwater ; Water storage ; Groundwater ; Groundwater recharge ; Flow discharge ; Chemical composition ; Runoff ; Drainage
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 551.48 G000 WAR Record No: H045969)
http://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H045969_TOC.pdf
(0.58 MB)

10 Armour, J. D.; Berthelsen, S.; Ruaysoongnern, S.; Moody, P. W.; Noble, Andrew D. 2005. Remediation of soil acidification by form of nitrogen fertilizer on grass swards of Australia and Thailand. In International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS); Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD); Thailand. Land Development Department (LDD); International Water Management Institute (IWMI); FAO. Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (FAO RAP); Khon Kaen University. Faculty of Agriculture. Management of tropical sandy soils for sustainable agriculture: a holistic approach for sustainable development of problem soils in the tropics. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Management of Tropical Sandy Soils for Sustainable Ariculture, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 27 November – 2 December 2005. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (FAO RAP). pp.135-139.
Soil profiles ; Acidification ; Grasses ; Pastures ; Species ; Cropping systems ; Nitrogen fertilizers ; Soil pH ; Alkalinity ; Acrisols / Australia / Thailand / Mareeba / Tully / Chiang Yuen
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 630 G000 INT Record No: H047325)
ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ag125e/ag125e_full.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H047325.pdf
(0.36 MB) (16.9 MB)
Acidification of soil profiles from legume and N fertilized crops is a serious sustainability threat. Under tropical conditions of Northeast Thailand and Northern Australia, acidification to >90 cm has been recorded in Stylosanthes and Leucaena based pasture systems. Acidification has also been measured in other Australian cropping systems fertilized with urea or ammonium forms of N. The major processes contributing to what could be termed anthropogenic acidification are removal of base cations in the harvested product and leaching below the root zone of nitrate from ammonium and urea N fertiliser or legumes resulting in an accumulation of protons in surfaces horizons. If prophylactic applications of lime are not undertaken, acid generation in surface horizons will progressively move down the profile inducing subsoil acidification. Subsoil acidity is often difficult to correct using conventional applications of liming products. Field experiments with pastures on Acrisols in Northeast Australia (two sites) and Northeast Thailand (one site) compared the rates of alkalisation or acidification from N applied as nitrate or as urea (Australia) or ammonium sulphate (Thailand). Soil pH increased where N was applied as nitrate and decreased where N was applied as urea or ammonium sulphate. At one of the sites in Australia, regular applications of N as nitrate at 350 kg N ha-1 year-1 were made to irrigated Digitaria melanjiana cv Jarra. This significantly increased soil pH (1:5 0.01 M CaCl2) by up to 0.5 units to a depth of 0.90 m over a period of 4 years when compared to bare soil. The alkalisation of the profile was equivalent to 2.7 t/ha of calcium carbonate distributed evenly down the profile. Urea at the same rate of N decreased soil pH at 20-50 cm by 0.2 units. Similar but smaller changes were measured at the other Australian site (Brachiaria decumbens) and the site in Thailand (Andropogon gayanus cv Carimagua (Gamba grass). Treatment effects at these sites were restricted by time (1 year) or seasonal conditions that limited the number of N applications that could be applied (290 kg N/ha over 3 years) at the Thai site. The research has clearly demonstrated that nitrate N fertilizer can rapidly correct soil acidity down the soil profile to 0.9 m and this is attributed to the release of alkali from roots as nitrate is taken up. Such a strategy may be an effective approach to addressing subsoil acidification where surface applications of lime are ineffective and profile modification is cost prohibitive.

11 Addisie, M. B.; Langendoen, E. J.; Aynalem, D. W.; Ayele, G. K.; Tilahun, S. A.; Schmitter, Petra; Mekuria, Wolde; Moges, M. M.; Steenhuis, T. S. 2018. Assessment of practices for controlling shallow valley-bottom gullies in the sub-humid Ethiopian Highlands. Water, 10(4):1-15.
Gully erosion ; Assessment ; Best practices ; Rehabilitation ; Sediment ; Highlands ; Valleys ; Vegetation ; Slope ; Farmers ; Watersheds ; Dams ; Grasses ; Soil conservation ; Water conservation / Africa / Ethiopia / Ethiopian Highlands
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048964)
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H048964.pdf
Rehabilitation of large valley bottom gullies in developing countries is hampered by high cost. Stopping head cuts at the time of initiation will prevent large gullies from forming and is affordable. However, research on practices to control shallow gully heads with local materials is limited. The objective of this research was therefore to identify cost-effective shallow gully head stabilization practices. The four-year study was conducted on 14 shallow gullies (<3 m deep) in the central Ethiopian highlands. Six gullies were used as a control. Heads in the remaining eight gullies were regraded to a 1:1 slope. Additional practices implemented were adding either riprap or vegetation or both on the regraded heads and stabilizing the gully bed downstream. Gully heads were enclosed by fencing to prohibit cattle access to the planted vegetation. The median yearly head retreat of the control gullies was 3.6 m a-1 with a maximum of 23 m a-1. Vegetative treatments without riprap prevented gully incision by trapping sediments but did not stop the upslope retreat. The gully heads protected by riprap did not erode. Regrading the slope and adding riprap was most effective in controlling gully head retreat, and with hay grown on the fenced-in areas around the practice, it was profitable for farmers.

Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from Inmagic WebPublisher PRO