Your search found 6 records
1 Brown, K. A.; Hyer, N. L. 2010. Managing projects: a team-based approach. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Irwin. 416p. + DVD. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series Operations and Decision Sciences)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 658.404 G000 BRO Record No: H047339)
(2.14 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 307.14 G000 CHA Record No: H047659)
(0.29 MB)
3 Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. (Eds.) 2001. Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: SAGE Publications. 468p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 300.72 G000 REA Record No: H047660)
(0.46 MB)
4 Karugia, J.; Massawe, S.; Guthiga, P.; Ogada, M.; Nwafor, M.; Chilonda, Pius; Musaba, E. 2016. Factors influencing the effectiveness of productivity-enhancing interventions: an assessment of selected programs. In Benin, S. (Ed.). Agricultural productivity in Africa: trends, patterns, and determinants. Washington, DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). pp.247-333.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 338.16 G100 BEN Record No: H048032)
(0.63 MB) (5.03 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048089)
(2.16 MB)
Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis were used to analyze stakeholders’ social and structural characteristics based on their interests, influence and interactions in Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya. Even though the Kenyan government and its agencies seem to command higher influence and interest in water resource management, the presence of influential and central stakeholders from non-government sectors plays a key role in strengthening partnership in a governance environment with multiple sectors, complex issues and competing interests. Interactions in the basin are guided by stakeholders’ interest and sphere of influence, which have both promoted participation in implementing a collaborative water governance framework.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H048432)
(0.44 MB)
Existing studies on adaptation to climate change mainly focus on a comparison of male-headed and female-headed households. Aiming at a more nuanced gender analysis, this study examines how husbands and wives within the same household perceive climate risks and use group-based approaches as coping strategies. The data stem from a unique intra-household survey involving 156 couples in rural Kenya. The findings indicate that options for adapting to climate change closely interplay with husbands' and wives' roles and responsibilities, social norms, risk perceptions and access to resources. A higher percentage of wives were found to adopt crop-related strategies, whereas husbands employ livestock- and agroforestry-related strategies. Besides, there are gender-specific climate information needs, trust in information and preferred channels of information dissemination. Further, it turned out that group-based approaches benefit husbands and wives differently. Policy interventions that rely on group-based approaches should reflect the gender reality on the ground in order to amplify men's and women's specific abilities to manage risks and improve well-being outcomes in the face of accelerating climate change.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from