Your search found 12 records
1 Srivastava, J. P.; Reinhard, C. 1996. Agricultural knowledge systems in the transitioning economies: A survey of World Bank experiences. Washington, DC, USA: CGIAR. vi, 140p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 630.72 G810 SRI Record No: H020074)
2 Maxwell, W. C. H.; Preul, H. C.; Stout, G. E. (Eds.) 1996. Proceedings Rivertech 96 - Volume 2: 1st International Conference on New/Emerging Concepts for Rivers, September 22 - September 26, 1996, Fairmont Hotel, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Urbana, IL, USA: IWRA. pp.475-931.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 627.12 G000 MAX Record No: H021108)
3 Bosnjakovic, B. 1998. UN/ECE strategies for protecting the environment with respect of international watercourses: The Helsinki and Espoo Conventions. In Salman, S. M. A.; de Chazournes, L. B. (Eds.), International watercourses: Enhancing cooperation and managing conflict - Proceedings of a World Bank Seminar. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank. pp.47-64.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 SAL Record No: H023200)
4 OECD. 1999. Agricultural policies in emerging and transition economies 1999 - Volume II. Paris, France: OECD. 116p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 338.1 G000 OEC Record No: H027988)
Supplement to Agricultural policies in emerging and transition economies.
5 Holzwarth, F. 2000. The Danube River Basin: An experience with transboundary water management. In Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI), Proceedings - SIWI Seminar: Water Security for Multinational Water Systems: Opportunity for Development, Stockholm, August 19, 2000. Stockholm, Sweden: SIWI. pp.122-126.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 STO Record No: H028156)
6 Kenzic, S.; Margeta, J. 2002. Integrated management of coastal sewerage systems: The case of Kastela Bay, Croatia. Water Resources Management, 16(4):279-305.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H031301)
7 Petošic, D.; Tadic, L.; Romic, D.; Tomic, F. 2004. Drainage outflow in different pipe-drainage variants on gleyic podzoluvisol in the Sava river valley. Irrigation and Drainage, 53(1):17-27.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H034484)
8 Hengl, T.; Gruber, S.; Shrestha, D. P. 2004. Reduction of errors in digital terrain parameters used in soil-landscape modelling. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5(2):97-112.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 6975 Record No: H035190)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 MAL Record No: H045610)
(0.38 MB)
10 Global Water Intelligence (GWI). 2013. Global water market 2014: meeting the world's water and wastewater needs until 2018. Vol. 2. Oxford, UK: Media Analytics Ltd. pp.427-1038 + 1CD.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 GLO e-copy SF Record No: H046241)
(0.57 MB)
11 Chen, Y.; Takara, K.; Cluckie, I. D.; de Smedt, F. H. 2004. GIS and remote sensing in hydrology, water resources and environment. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS). 422p. (IAHS Publication 289)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 526.0285 G000 CHE Record No: H046621)
(0.41 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H051705)
(860 KB)
Water scarcity and security drive attention to water reuse in policy and business. However, water reuse may generate new water loops and challenge water governance with new and different types of water, risks, involved actors, and responsibilities. These challenges demand robust institutional arrangements related to water governance. This article assesses the institutional arrangements associated with four case studies in Spain, Italy, Croatia, and Israel. The findings reveal that the more diverse the water uses and users, the more challenges and risks, particularly those associated with institutional arrangements such as quality standards, sanctions, and conflict prevention, are likely to emerge. The weaknesses of governance models and regulations to deal with changes, uncertainties, and public resistance call for special attention to the design of the institutional arrangements before the adoption. Independent of the type of technology adopted, governance may be improved by ensuring internal and external water monitoring; integrating water management with spatial concerns; improving training, expert engagement, and civil society awareness; and reducing water reuse costs. In addition, alternative models that guarantee the efficiency of governance in attaining objectives and assuring the participation of new water users in the management of water reuse loops may also improve governance.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from