Your search found 16 records
1 Huibers, F.; Fall, B.; Samb, A. A. 1988. WARDA - Water Management Project mid term research results. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University. Department of Irrigation and Civil Engineering. 36p. (Report no.4)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G218 HUI Record No: H06017)
2 Huibers, F.; Speelman, J. 1989. Water management in village irrigation schemes of the Senegal river valley: Technical aspects. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University. Department of Irrigation and Civil Engineering. 50p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G218 HUI Record No: H06016)
3 Huibers, F.; Fall, B. 1987. Orientations of the second phase of the water management project. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University. Department of Irrigation and Civil Engineering. 12p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7 G218 HUI Record No: H06015)
4 Diemer, G.; Fall, B.; Huibers, F.. 1987. Towards a new concept of irrigation. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University. Department of Irrigation and Civil Engineering. 16p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G218 DIE Record No: H06823)
5 Bastiaansen, J.; Huibers, F.. 1994. Designing for water users organizations - Examples from Africa. Grid: IPTRID Network Magazine, 5:4-5.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 3572 Record No: H015056)
6 Bastiaansen, J.; Huibers, F.. 1994. Conception des r,seaux pour les groupements d'usagers - Exemples d'Afrique. [Designing for water users organizations: examples from Africa]. Grid: IPTRID Network Magazine, 5:4-5.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 3613 Record No: H015363)
7 Bastiansen, J.; Huibers, F.. 1994. Dise¤o para organizaciones de usuarios de agua: ejemplos de Africa. [Designing for water users organizations: examples from Africa]. Grid: IPTRID Network Magazine, 5:4-5.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 3686 Record No: H016093)
8 Huibers, F.; Diemer, G. 1995. Making assumptions - Institutional constraints to irrigation design and management. Waterlines, 13(4):9-11.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H016710)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H030910)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 6754 Record No: H031088)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.5 G200 KER Record No: H031917)
(264.89 KB)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H034012)
13 Huibers, F.; Redwood, M.; Raschid-Sally, Liqa. 2010. Challenging conventional approaches to managing wastewater use in agriculture. In Drechsel, Pay; Scott, C. A.; Raschid-Sally, Liqa; Redwood, M.; Bahri, Akissa (Eds.). Wastewater irrigation and health: assessing and mitigating risk in low-income countries. London, UK: Earthscan; Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC); Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). pp.287-301. (Also in French).
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.5 G000 DRE Record No: H042614)
(0.21 MB)
In developing countries urban wastewater management often fails to cope with increasing wastewater generation. Financial, technical and institutional limitations force authorities to discharge substantial amounts of untreated or partially treated wastewater into surface waters. Consequently, uncontrolled use of polluted water is increasingly common in the downstream peri-urban areas. Although wastewater use bears a significant risk on human health, such use is also productive and an asset for many. Agricultural use of wastewater is a strong manifestation of the urban-rural connection and transfers a waterborne risk from the wastewater disposal system to the food chain, requiring a paradigm shift in the approaches applied to risk minimization. Conventional models for urban wastewater treatment and management are based on top-down, mechanically driven approaches that do not, or do not sufficiently, consider the links between the social, economic and health aspects. This situation is understandable from historical and technological points of view, but does not provide innovative solutions to current problems in developing country cities. A different approach is required, one that rethinks conventional wastewater system design and management. By adopting a systems approach to analysing both the water and food chains, one discovers the interactions of different stakeholders that treat and use (or abuse) water, the impacts on overall productivity and the risks. Governance systems to manage wastewater use in agriculture must incorporate decentralization to accommodate thinking at the bottom layer, encourage stakeholder engagement and provide coordination and policy cohesion for managing risks jointly from both the water and food chains.
14 Bos. R.; Mara, D.; Bahri, Akissa; Jimenez, B.; Stenstroem, T. - A.; Huibers, F.; Redwood, M.; Kinane, M.; Hamilton, A.; Murray, A.; Nelson, K.; Abaidoo, R.; Raschid-Sally, Liqa; Tiongco, M.; Razak, S.; Ensink, J.; Amerasinghe, Priyanie; Kone, D.; Drechsel, Pay; Moe, C.; Buckley, C.; Niang, S.; Scott, C.; Amoah, Philip; Dalahmeh, S.; Cisse, G.; Kone, B.; LeJeune, J.; Karg, H.; Keraita, Bernard; Evans, Alexandra; Zwane, A.; Silverman, A.; Armstrong, J.; Awadzi, D.; Cofie, Olufunke; Schoeffler, M.; Van Rooijen, D.; Mensah, Ernest Abraham. 2008. Accra Consensus: Agenda for Research, Capacity Building and Action on the Safe Use of Wastewater and Excreta in Agriculture. [A public statement]. 2p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H043803)
15 Scott, Christopher; Faruqui , N.; Carr, R.; Blumenthal, U.; Amerasinghe, Felix; Redwood, M.; Ramachandran, G.; Al-Beiruti, S. N.; Prain, G.; Gopal, M. G.; Raschid, Liqa; Huibers, F.; Agodzo, S.; Mukherjee, M.; Madsen, T.; Cornish, G.; Silva, P.; Minhas, P. S.; Niang, S.; Al Khatib, N.; Ghougassian, B.; Drechsel, Pay; Shetty, S.; Blummel, M.; Sengupta, A. K.; Matsuno, Y.; van Veenhuizen, R.; Hall, A.; Keraita, Bernard; Simmons, Rob; Shalabi, M.; Murray-Rust, Hammond; Hainsworth, S.; Rajan, V.; Buechler, Stephanie; Reddy, U. M.; McCornick, Peter; Devi, Gayathri; Kielen, N.; Ensink, Jeroen; Devi, Rama; van der Hoek, Wim; Kundu, N.; Haan, Max; Abayawardana, Sarath; Narayana, P.; Bouma, Jetske. 2005. The Hyderabad Declaration on Wastewater Use in Agriculture, 14 November 2002, Hyderabad, India. [A public statement]. 3p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H043804)
16 Huibers, F.; Redwood, M.; Raschid-Sally, Liqa. 2011. Discuter les approches conventionnelles de gestion de l’utilisation des eaux usees en agriculture. In French. [Challenging conventional approaches to managing wastewater use in agriculture]. In Drechsel, Pay; Scott, C. A.; Raschid-Sally, Liqa; Redwood, M.; Bahri, Akissa. L’irrigation avec des eaux usees et la sante: evaluer et attenuer les risques dans les pays a faible revenu. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI); Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC); Quebec, Canada: University of Quebec. pp.309-325. (Also in English).
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI Record No: H044471)
(0.78 MB) (5.96MB)
In developing countries urban wastewater management often fails to cope with increasing wastewater generation. Financial, technical and institutional limitations force authorities to discharge substantial amounts of untreated or partially treated wastewater into surface waters. Consequently, uncontrolled use of polluted water is increasingly common in the downstream peri-urban areas. Although wastewater use bears a significant risk on human health, such use is also productive and an asset for many. Agricultural use of wastewater is a strong manifestation of the urban-rural connection and transfers a waterborne risk from the wastewater disposal system to the food chain, requiring a paradigm shift in the approaches applied to risk minimization. Conventional models for urban wastewater treatment and management are based on top-down, mechanically driven approaches that do not, or do not sufficiently, consider the links between the social, economic and health aspects. This situation is understandable from historical and technological points of view, but does not provide innovative solutions to current problems in developing country cities. A different approach is required, one that rethinks conventional wastewater system design and management. By adopting a systems approach to analysing both the water and food chains, one discovers the interactions of different stakeholders that treat and use (or abuse) water, the impacts on overall productivity and the risks. Governance systems to manage wastewater use in agriculture must incorporate decentralization to accommodate thinking at the bottom layer, encourage stakeholder engagement and provide coordination and policy cohesion for managing risks jointly from both the water and food chains.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from