Your search found 63 records
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.5 G000 HUS Record No: H028996)
(430.18KB)
This paper presents an approach for analyzing the socioeconomic, health, and environmental aspects of urban wastewater use in peri-urban agriculture, using typical characteristics of a major city in a developing country. Peri-urban area of Faisalabad is chosen to represent this context.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.5 G000 HUS Record No: H030078)
(772 KB)
3 Hussain, I.; Hanjra, M. A.. 2002. Agricultural water and poverty: Understanding linkages and identifying interventions. In Second South Asia Water Forum, Islamabad, Pakistan, 14-16 December 2002 – Proceedings, vol.2. pp.537-570.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G570 HUS Record No: H031837)
4 Hussain, I.; Giordano, M.; Hanjra, M. A.. 2003. Agricultural water and poverty linkages: Case studies on large and small systems. In ADB, Water and poverty – A collection of case studies: Experiences from the Field. Manila, Philippines: ADB. pp.57-78.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 ADB Record No: H032548)
5 Hanjra, M. A.. 2001. Irrigation, poverty and inequality: A performance based review of global evidence. Unpublished report. 144p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G000 HAN Record No: H032746)
6 Hanjra, M. A.. 2001. Valuation of socio-economic and environmental impacts of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. Unpublished report. 70p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.3 G000 HAN Record No: H032747)
(0.4 MB)
7 Hanjra, M. A.. 2002. Does irrigation infrastructure development matter for dynamic poverty alleviation?: Micro-econometric evidence from Pakistan. Unpublished report. 125p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G730 HAN Record No: H032748)
8 Hanjra, M. A.. 2001. A methodological framework for analyzing irrigation-poverty nexus. Unpublished report. 31p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G000 HAN Record No: H032749)
9 Hanjra, M. A.. 2001. Pro-poor intervention strategies in irrigated agriculture: A bibliography. Unpublished report. 45p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G000 HAN Record No: H032750)
10 Hanjra, M. A.. 2001. Pro-poor irrigation management: Economic, legal, institutional, and policy interventions. Unpublished report. 137p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G000 HAN Record No: H032751)
11 Hanjra, M. A.. 2000. Socio-economic and environmental effects of wastewater irrigation: State of the art, problem areas and policy alternatives. Unpublished report. 85p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.5 G000 HAN Record No: H032782)
(0.4MB)
12 Hanjra, M. A.. 2000. Socio-economic aspects of wastewater use in agriculture: A bibliography. Unpublished report. 34p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.5 G000 HAN Record No: H032783)
(0.2 MB)
13 Hanjra, M. A.. 2002. Does irrigation infrastructure development matter for dynamic poverty alleviation?: Micro-econometric evidence from Sri Lanka. Unpublished report. 155p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.4 G744 HAN Record No: H032784)
14 Hussain, I.; Hanjra, M. A.. 2003. Does irrigation water matter for rural poverty alleviation?: Evidence from South and South-East Asia. Water Policy, 5(5-6):429-442.
(Location: IWMI-SA Call no: PER, P 6702 Record No: H033741)
15 Narayanamoorthy, A.; Hanjra, M. A.. 2006. Rural infrastructure and agricultural output linkages: A study of 256 Indian districts. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3):444-459.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H039411)
16 de Fraiture, Charlotte; Wichelns, D.; Rockstrom, J.; Kemp-Benedict, E.; Eriyagama, Nishadi; Gordon, L. J.; Hanjra, M. A.; Hoogeveen, J.; Huber-Lee, A.; Karlberg, L. 2007. Looking ahead to 2050: scenarios of alternative investment approaches. In Molden, David (Ed.). Water for food, water for life: a Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London, UK: Earthscan; Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). pp.91-145.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 630.7 G000 IWM Record No: H040196)
(2.97 MB)
17 Castillo, G. E.; Namara, Regassa; Ravnborg, H. M.; Hanjra, M. A.; Smith, L.; Hussein, M. H.; Bene, C.; Cook, S.; Hirsch, D.; Polak, P.; Valee, Domitille; van Koppen, Barbara. 2007. Reversing the flow: agricultural water management pathways for poverty reduction. In Molden, David (Ed.). Water for food, water for life: a Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London, UK: Earthscan; Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). pp.149-191.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 630.7 G000 IWM Record No: H040197)
(2.45 MB)
18 Molden, David; Oweis, T. Y.; Pasquale, S.; Kijne, J. W.; Hanjra, M. A.; Bindraban, P. S.; Bouman, B. A. M.; Cook, S.; Erenstein, O.; Farahani, H.; Hachum, A.; Hoogeveen, J.; Mahoo, H.; Nangia, V.; Peden, D.; Sikka, A.; Silva, P.; Turral, Hugh; Upadhyaya, A.; Zwart, S. 2007. Pathways for increasing agricultural water productivity. In Molden, David (Ed.). Water for food, water for life: a Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London, UK: Earthscan; Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). pp.279-310.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 630.7 G000 IWM Record No: H040200)
(2.06 MB)
19 Hanjra, M. A.; Gichuki, Francis. 2008. Investments in agricultural water management for poverty reduction in Africa: case studies of Limpopo, Nile, and Volta river basins. Natural Resources Forum, 32:185-202.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G110 HAN, PER Record No: H041547)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H042575)
(0.38 MB)
In its broadest sense, water productivity (WP) is the net return for a unit of water used. Improvement of water productivity aims at producing more food, income, better livelihoods and ecosystem services with less water. There is considerable scope for improving water productivity of crop, livestock and fisheries at field through to basin scale. Practices used to achieve this include water harvesting, supplemental irrigation, deficit irrigation, precision irrigation techniques and soil–water conservation practices. Practices not directly related to water management impact water productivity because of interactive effects such as those derived from improvements in soil fertility, pest and disease control, crop selection or access to better markets. However, there are several reasons to be cautious about the scope and ease of achieving water productivity gains. Crop water productivity is already quite high in highly productive regions, and gains in yield (per unit of land area) do not necessarily translate into gains in water productivity. Reuse of water that takes place within an irrigated area or a basin can compensate for the perceived losses at the field-scale in terms of water quantity, though the water quality is likely to be affected. While crop breeding has played an important role in increasing water productivity in the past, especially by improving the harvest index, such large gains are not easily foreseen in the future. More importantly, enabling conditions for farmers and water managers are not in place to enhance water productivity. Improving water productivity will thus require an understanding of the biophysical as well as the socioeconomic environments crossing scales between field, farm and basin.Priority areas where substantive increases in water productivity are possible include: (i) areas where poverty is high and water productivity is low, (ii) areas of physical water scarcity where competition for water is high, (iii) areas with little water resources development where high returns from a little extra water use can make a big difference, and (iv) areas of water-driven ecosystem degradation, such as falling groundwater tables, and river desiccation. However, achieving these gains will be challenging at least, and will require strategies that consider complex biophysical and socioeconomic factors.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from