Your search found 5 records
1 Holt, J. C.; Meegaskumbura, P. B. (Eds.) 2006. Identity and difference: Essays on society and culture in Sri Lanka. Kandy, Sri Lanka: Intercollegiate Sri Lanka Educational (ISLE) Program. 374p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 954.93 G744 HOL Record No: H040680)
2 South, A. 2009. Ethnic politics in Burma: states of conflict. Oxon, UK: Routledge. 277p. (Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia Series)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 305.8 G590 SOU Record No: H048601)
(0.34 MB)
3 Myint-U, T. 2020. The hidden history of Burma: race, capitalism, and the crisis of democracy in the 21st century. New York, NY, USA: W. W. Norton & Company. 288p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 959.1053 G590 MYI Record No: H049477)
(0.15 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052233)
(0.38 MB) (390 KB)
Despite evidence of women’s roles and expertise in the management of water, energy, food, and the environment (WEFE), the WEFE literature is almost silent on gender issues. In the context of climate change, achieving more inclusive management of natural resources is vital; yet women continue to be underrepresented as professionals in WEFE sectors, and largely absent in leadership positions. Using Nepal as a case study, this paper explores the enduring barriers to their exclusion, and entry points for greater equity among professionals in these sectors. To do so, we draw on key informant interviews with 34 male and 31 women professionals from government, civil society, non-governmental organizations and consultants, as well as a roundtable discussion with 20 women professionals specifically focused on gender barriers in these sectors in Nepal. Drawing on Gaventa (2006)’s power cube, this paper examines how power dynamics within and between the public and the private spheres create a web of barriers that conflate to sideline women professionals. While women have reached the “closed space” as defined by Gaventa (i.e., are recruited to professional positions in WEFE sectors), different sources of “hidden” and “invisible” power at play in the public and private spheres continue to limit their participation, influence and decision-making. We argue that the continued marginalization of women professionals calls for a focus on understanding the power and intersectionality dynamics that sustain exclusion. This focus is critical for the development of strategies to increase the voice and leadership of women professionals in WEFE decision-making.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052237)
(1.03 MB) (1.03 MB)
The enactment of a new Constitution in 2015 in Nepal marked a shift to a representative system of federal governance. Earlier in 2002, the country’s Tenth Five Year Plan had committed to a core focus on gender equality and social inclusion (GESI) in national policies and governance. How do these two strategic shifts in policy align in the case of WASH projects in rural Nepal? Applying a feminist political lens, we review the implementation of WASH initiatives in two rural districts to show that deep-rooted intersectional complexities of caste, class, and gender prevent inclusive WASH outcomes. Our findings show that the policy framing for gender equitable and socially inclusive outcomes have not impacted the WASH sector, where interventions continue as essentially technical interventions. While there has been significant increase in the number of women representatives in local governance structures since 2017, systemic, informal power relationship by caste, ethnicity and gender entrenched across institutional structures and cultures persist and continue to shape unequal gender-power dynamics. This is yet another example that shows that transformative change requires more than just affirmative policies.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from