Your search found 4 records
1 Bell, C.; Hazel, P.; Slade, R.. 1982. Project evaluation in regional perspective: A study of an irrigation project in northwest Malaysia. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank. x, 326p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G714 BEL Record No: H01281)
2 Berkoff, J.; Slade, R.. 1987. Operational guide to monitoring irrigation water management in India. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank. India Department. Agriculture Division. v.p.
Water management ; Monitoring ; Institutions ; Irrigation efficiency ; Irrigation programs ; Irrigation operation ; Computer software ; Yield response functions ; Hydraulics / India
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G635 BER Record No: H04040)
3 Rice, E. B.; Slade, R.; Yoder, R.; Perera, J.; Brolsma, A.; Vermillion, D. L. 1996. Irrigation O&M and system performance in Southeast Asia: An OED impact study. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank. 51p. + annexes. (World Bank report no.15824)
Irrigation programs ; Irrigation canals ; Performance evaluation ; Irrigation operation ; Maintenance ; Cost recovery ; Farm income ; Economic aspects ; Economic impact ; Flood control ; Water users ; Farmers' attitudes / South East Asia / Thailand / Myanmar / Vietnam / Bangladesh / Lam Pao Scheme / Maeklong Right Bank Scheme / Kinda Scheme / Kinmundaung Subproject / Azin Subproject / Saigon River / Dau Tieng Dam
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G800 RIC Record No: H022518)
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/271511468768578259/Irrigation-O-M-and-system-performance-in-Southeast-Asia-an-OED-impact-study
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H022518.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H022518.pdf
(12.08 MB) (12.08MB)
4 Slade, R.; Pathak, M.; Connors, S.; Tignor, M.; Okem, Andrew Emmanuel; Leprince-Ringuet, N. 2024. Back to basics for the IPCC: applying lessons from AR6 to the Seventh Assessment Cycle. npj Climate Action, 3:48. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00130-4]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: PendingH052932)
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been producing influential reports for over 35 years. As the IPCC’s Seventh Assessment Report (AR7) cycle begins, we offer our perspective as former members of the IPCC Technical Support Units from Working Groups I, II & III, and the Synthesis Report on lessons learned during the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) cycle. We identify three broad issues that, if addressed, could reinforce and sustain the IPCC in continuing its mission to comprehensively assess the scientific understanding of human-induced climate change. These are the imperative to ensure balanced representation, the importance of author recognition, and the need for improved institutional memory. Our recommendations include addressing skill and training needs, tackling barriers to participation particularly for Global South authors, and ensuring all contributors receive appropriate recognition for their efforts. We focus, in particular, on feasible incremental changes that could be implemented during AR7 without major changes to the underlying procedures that require approval by the 195 member governments that make up the IPCC.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
