Your search found 1121 records
1 Development Alternatives Inc. 1984. Strategies for donor assistance to irrigation development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC, USA: Development Alternatives Inc. 74, [12]p.
(Location: IWMI-SA Call no: 631.7.8 G100 DEV Record No: H056)
2 Levine, G. 1981. Irrigation development and strategy issues for the Asian region. Appendix A in J. Keller et al., Irrigation development options and investment strategies for the 1980's. Logan, Utah: Utah State University. Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering. pp.A1-A22. (Water management synthesis report no.3)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G584 KEL Record No: H070)
3 Moris, J. R.; Thom, D. (Eds.) 1985. African irrigation overview: Interim review. Logan, Utah: Department of Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering. Utah State University. Draft manuscript. Logan, UT, USA: Department of Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering, Utah State University. 70p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 941 Record No: H0150)
Chap. 2, General conclusions and Chap. 7, Implications for donors
4 Dhawan, B. D. 1984. Development of tubewell irrigation in India. New Delhi, India: Agricole Publishing Academy. xviii, 208 p. (Studies in economic development and planning no. 26)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.6.3 G635 DHA Record No: H0242)
5 Pal, S. P. 1983. Contribution of irrigation to agricultural production and productivity. New Delhi, India: National Council of Applied Economic Research. [v], 109 p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G635 PAL Record No: H0239)
The NCAER study is primarily concerned with the empirical measurement of the contribution of irrigation to agricultural productivity, cropping pattern, expansion of cropped area and aggregate production. An econometric model is built to integrate individual contributions of irrigation to productivity, cropping pattern and cropped area, and to obtain an overall measure of the contribution to agricultural production. The model also helps in ranking, irrigation and fertilizer in order of their importance. The econometric model can be restricted to obtain similar results with regard to other inputs.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.6.3 G635 UTT Record No: H0252)
7 Development Alternatives Inc. 1984. Funding requirements for adequate irrigation system operation and maintenance. Sacramento, CA, USA: Development Alternatives Inc. 88 p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G730 DEV Record No: H0358)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.37 G744 FAR Record No: H0396)
9 Lynch, B. D. 1985. Community participation and local organization for small-scale irrigation. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University. iv, 102p. (Water management synthesis report no.34)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.3 G000 LYN Record No: H0478)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G000 BER Record No: H0476)
11 Taylor, D. C.; Noh, K.M.; Hussein, M. A. An economic analysis of irrigation development in Malaysia. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI. iv, 85 p. (Rice Policies in Southeast Asia Project working paper no. 1)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G714 TAY Record No: H0296)
12 Weaver, T. F.; Peterson, H. B. 1981. Irrigation development options and investment strategies for the 1980's: Nepal. Logan, Utah: Utah State University. [16 p.] (Water management synthesis report no. 2)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.3 G726 WEA Record No: H0288)
13 Valera, A. B. 1985. A comparative assessment of three irrigation systems at Central Luzon, Philippines. Thesis presented to the Faculty of Graduate School of Cornell University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. xvi, 283 p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7 G732 VAL Record No: H0539)
14 Small, L. E. 1982. Investment decisions for the development and utilization of irrigation resources in Southeast Asia. In ADC Teaching and Research Forum Workshop report no.26. Bangkok: ADC. pp.1-9.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G572 SMA Record No: H0507)
The workshop was organized around the theme of investment decisions for the further development and utilization of irrigation resources in South East Asia. Implied in this theme, and in the rationale for the workshop, was the notion that policy choices among alternative investments in irrigation resources would have to be made by nations in Southeast Asia, and that research related to these choices could be useful to those individuals making such policy decisions.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.7 G730 KEM Record No: H0336)
This research program was funded by USAID, organized by CSU and sent out to identify good investments for developing countries in water management. Loss of almost half of the water from watercourses was identified as a primary waste of irrigation water which is a limiting factor in crop production in Pakistan. Physical causes of the loss were identified as high porosity of upper portions of the banks due to burrowing of soil for weekly construction of dams, and rising levels of water in the watercourse due to vegetative growth and sedimentation. Difficulty in organizing farmers to accomplish regular cleaning and repair was identified as an underlying sociologic cause of the loss. Experimental masonry and concrete watercourses were built by the government and given to the farmers. They were too expensive to provide a nationwide solution. The farmers did not appreciate and maintain them because they had no investment therein. Other lined watercourses on which the government paid for materials and the farmers provided labor were better appreciated and maintained, but took longer to build and still required large amounts of cement and were too costly for a national program. Cooperative improvement of the earthen channels by the farmers with the government providing the materials and design for concrete control structures at the junctions was developed as a program which had a benefit:cost ratio of at least 3 to 1 and was eagerly accepted by the farmers in a study which involved a series of case histories. Subsequent studies indicated that a good and regular cleaning and repair program would save almost as much water and provide higher benefits with much lower government input. However, the watercourse improvement plan with its concrete control structures was more eagerly accepted by the farmers. Full benefits of the improvement were obtained only by those farmers who organized themselves to clean and maintain their watercourses regularly.
16 Eckert, J.; Dimick, N.; Clyma, W. 1975. Water management alternatives for Pakistan: A tentative appraisal. Fort Collins, CO, USA: Colorado State University. vii, 61p. (Water management technical report no.43 / Pakistan field report no.5)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G730 ECK Record No: H0331)
17 ADB. 1986. Review of Bank operations in the irrigation sector 1966-1985. Manila, Philippines: ADB. 76p.
(Location: IWMI-SA Call no: 631.7.4 G000 ADB Record No: H0456)
18 ARTI. 1980. A study of five settlement schemes prior to irrigation modernization. Vol.V - Padaviya. Colombo, Sri Lanka: ARTI. v, 70p. (ARTI research study no.39)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.4 G744 AGR Record No: H0442)
19 Gill, G. J. 1983. The demand for tubewell equipment in relation to groundwater availability. v, 54 p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.6.3 G584 GIL Record No: H0465)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.7 G744 RAN Record No: H0441)
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from