Your search found 12 records
1 Feitelson, E.. 1997. A win-win option - Joint management of West Bank aquifers. Waterlines, 15(4):8-9.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H020452)
2 Feitelson, E.; Haddad, M. 1998. A stepwise open-ended approach to the identification of joint management structures for shared aquifers. Water International, 23(4):227-237.
Water resource management ; Aquifers ; Groundwater ; International cooperation ; Conflict ; Institution building / Middle East / Israel / Palestine
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H024012)
3 Feitelson, E.. 2000. The ebb and flow of Arab-Osraeli water conflicts: Are past confrontations likely to resurface? Water Policy, 2(4-5):343-363.
Water resources ; Water scarcity ; Conflict ; History ; International cooperation ; Political aspects ; Wastewater / Middle East / Israel / Syria / Palestine / Jordan River
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H026957)
4 Chenoweth, J. L.; Feitelson, E.. 2001. Analysis of factors influencing data and information exchange in international river basins: Can such exchanges be used to build confidence in cooperative management? Water International, 26(4):499-512.
River basins ; Aquifers ; Water resource management ; International cooperation ; Data collection ; Case studies
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H029621)
5 Feitelson, E.; Chenoweth, J. 2002. Water poverty: towards a meaningful indicator. Water Policy, 4(3):263-281.
Water availability ; Water use ; Water scarcity ; Sustainability ; Water poverty ; Indicators ; Water supply
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H030915)
6 Feitelson, E.. 2003. When and how would shared aquifers be managed? Water International, 28(2):145-153.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H033030)
7 Feitelson, E.. 2005. Political economy of groundwater exploitation: The Israeli case. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 21(3):413-423.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H 37284)
8 Feitelson, E.. 2005. Priority rights for nature: a true constraint on aquifer over-exploitation? In Sahuquillo, A.; Capilla, J.; Martinez-Cortina, L.; Sanchez-Vila, X. (Eds.). Groundwater intensive use: selected papers, SINEX, Valencia, Spain, 10-14 December 2002. Lieden, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema. pp.199-207. (IAH Selected Papers on Hydrogeology 7)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.6.3 G000 SAH Record No: H038614)
9 Fischhendler, I.; Feitelson, E.. 2003. Spatial adjustment as a mechanism for resolving river basin conflicts: The U.S. – Mexico case. Political Geography, 25(5):557-583.
River basins ; Watercourses ; Conflict ; Water resource management ; International cooperation ; Hydrology ; Trade agreements / Mexico / USA / Colorado River / Rio Grand / Texas
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 7706 Record No: H039589)
10 Feitelson, E.; Fischhendler, I. 2007. Politics and institutions for groundwater management in a systemwide context. In Ragone, S. (Ed.). The Global Importance of Groundwater in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability, Alicante, Spain, 24-27 January 2006. Westerville, OH, USA: National Groundwater Association. pp.331-344.
Groundwater management ; Surface water ; Institutions ; Water law ; Aquifers / Israel / Lake Kinerret
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.9104 G000 RAG Record No: H040498)
11 Feitelson, E.. 2003. Sustainable groundwater management: has regulation worked in Israel, the Mecca of water management? In World Water Forum 3: Water, Food and Environment. Groundwater Governance in Asia: The Challenge of Taming a Colossal Anarchy, Kyoto, Japan, 17 March 2003. Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). pp.19-20.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H044093)
(0.07 MB)
12 Petersen-Perlman, J. D.; Feitelson, E.. 2022. The environment comes later: when and how are environmental considerations included in transboundary water agreements. Water International, 21p. (Online first) [doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2072663]
Transboundary waters ; River basins ; Environmental degradation ; International agreements ; Treaties ; Water resources ; Water stress ; Water quality ; Riparian zones ; Conflicts
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H051211)
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02508060.2022.2072663
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H051211.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H051211.pdf
(1.54 MB) (1.54 MB)
Until recently, most transboundary water agreements largely focused on utilization, frequently leading to environmental impacts. We examine under which circumstances are environmental considerations included in transboundary water agreements, how are they included and whether they address environmental effects of previous agreements. We analyse 75 treaties, many of which occur within (sub)basins with previously established water agreements. Human water stress, upstream large dams, OECD membership and previous water treaties (particularly those concerning utilization) are the most prevalent conditions where environmental degradation is considered. Our results also suggest that aridity incentivizes negotiating relationships to develop, thereby facilitating environmental water cooperation.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
