Your search found 13 records
1 Heathcote, I. W. 1998. Integrated watershed management: Principles and practice. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons. x, 414p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 HEA Record No: H023356)
2 Nachtnebel, H. P. 2000. The Danube River Basin environmental programme: Plans and actions for a basin wide approach. Water Policy, 2(1-2):113-129.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H026054)
3 Leibundgut, C.; McDonnell, J.; Schultz, G. (Eds.) 1999. Integrated methods in catchment hydrology: Tracer, remote sensing and new hydrometric techniques. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS). ix, 284p. (IAHS publication 258)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 551.48 G000 LEI Record No: H027482)
4 Yurtsever, Y. 1999. Use of environmental tritium to study catchment dynamics: Case study from the Danube River Basin. In Leibundgut, C.; McDonnell, J.; Schultz, G. (Eds.), Integrated methods in catchment hydrology: Tracer, remote sensing and new hydrometric techniques. Wallingford, UK: IAHS. pp.167-174.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 551.48 G000 LEI Record No: H027499)
5 Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) 2000. Proceedings - SIWI Seminar: Water Security for Multinational Water Systems: Opportunity for Development, Stockholm, August 19, 2000. Stockholm, Sweden: SIWI. 154p. (SIWI report 8)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 STO Record No: H028148)
6 Holzwarth, F. 2000. The Danube River Basin: An experience with transboundary water management. In Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI), Proceedings - SIWI Seminar: Water Security for Multinational Water Systems: Opportunity for Development, Stockholm, August 19, 2000. Stockholm, Sweden: SIWI. pp.122-126.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 STO Record No: H028156)
7 Stalzer, W. 2001. The Danube River Basin: international co-operation in water management. In Abernethy, C. L. (Ed.). Intersectoral management of river basins. Proceedings of an International Workshop on Integrated Water Management in Water-Stressed River Basins in Developing Countries: Strategies for Poverty Alleviation and Agricultural Growth, Loskop Dam, South Africa, 16-21 October 2000. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI); Feldafing, Germany: German Foundation for International Development (DSE). pp.327-342.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G000 ABE Record No: H029127)
(0.79)
8 Gerlak, A. K. 2004. Strengthening river basin institutions: The global environment facility and the Danube River Basin. Water Resources Research, 40:10p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 7267 Record No: H036631)
9 Treffner, J.; Mioc, V.; Wegerich, Kai. 2010. International river basins. In Wegerich, Kai; Warner, J. (Eds.). The politics of water: a survey. London, UK: Routledge. pp.321-369.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 WEG, e-copy SF Record No: H043030)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H045586)
(1.09 MB)
Wetlands are too often perceived as standalone elements and are poorly integrated into river basin management. The Ramsar Convention recognizes the critical linkage between wetlands, water and river basin management; the governments that are party to the Convention have committed to conserving their wetlands within a framework of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). The “Critical Path” approach and related guidance have been adopted by Contracting Parties of the Ramsar Convention in order to effectively integrate wetland conservation and management into river basin management planning and decision-making. However, despite international acceptance of the approach, it is not widely implemented. This paper provides one of the first case study based assessments of the Critical Path approach. The analysis of two contrasting Ramsar sites is presented in order to better understand the barriers to implementation in different development contexts. These are the Lobau wetland in Austria, where management institutions and regulatory frameworks are highly developed; and the Inner Niger Delta in Mali, where the capacity to implement IWRM is less evolved. A planning approach is proposed which involves structured and transparent methods for assessing ecosystem services and institutional capacity, and is suitable as a tool for identifying, prioritizing and negotiating trade-offs in ecosystem services and improving livelihoods. Based on the analysis, two main barriers to implementation are identified; mismatch between local and national or basin level priorities, and a lack of recognition of the ecosystem services provided by wetlands.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 EAR Record No: H046317)
(0.31 MB)
12 Ganoulis, J.; Quartano, K.; Skoulikaris, C. 2014. Promoting cooperation for transboundary water security: the experience of the UNESCO Chair/INWEB. In Grafton, R. Q.; Wyrwoll, P.; White, C.; Allendes, D. (Eds.). Global water: issues and insights. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University (ANU Press). pp.203-214.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H046566)
(0.60 MB)
13 Chen, Y.; Takara, K.; Cluckie, I. D.; de Smedt, F. H. 2004. GIS and remote sensing in hydrology, water resources and environment. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS). 422p. (IAHS Publication 289)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 526.0285 G000 CHE Record No: H046621)
(0.41 MB)
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from