Your search found 14 records
1 Manan, H. A. R. 1989. Ground-water management in Indonesia: A case study - Jakarta and Bandung. ESCAP Water Resources Journal, 159:1-10.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H05596)
2 Kwai-Sim, L. 1995. Water supply in megacities in South East Asia. In Stockholm Water Co., Water quality management heading for a new epoch: Proceedings: Fifth Stockholm Water Symposium 13-18 August 1995, Stockholm, Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Water Co. pp.87-97.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 STO Record No: H018437)
3 Indonesia. Ministry of Public Works. 1990. Social and institutional consultancy, Small Scale Irrigation Turnover Program: Quarterly report I. Unpublished consultancy report. iv, 12p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.3 G662 IND Record No: H022305)
4 Herlina; Indreswari, G.; Soeryantono. 1998. Optimized groundwater extraction modelling through computerized application of simplex method. In ICID, The Tenth Afro-Asian Regional Conference Proceedings: Water and land resources development and management for sustainable use, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, 19-24 July 1998. Volume II - B. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (INACID) pp.B13:1-9.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: ICID 631.7 G570 ICI Record No: H022944)
5 Kay, B. H. (Ed.) 1999. Water resources: Health, environment and development. New York, NY, USA: E & FN Spon. xvii, 250p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.5 G000 KAY Record No: H024345)
6 Yulianti, J. S.; Lence, B. J. 1999. Parameter uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling for polder system design. Journal of the American Water Resources Association; Water Resources Journal, 35(2):245-251; 202:39-46; 205:18-25.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H024633)
7 Bhatia, R.; Cestti, R.; Winpenny, J. 1995. Water conservation and reallocation: Best practice cases in improving economic efficiency and environmental quality. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank. v, 98p. (Water & sanitation currents)
Call no: 628.1 G000 BHA Record No: H026388)
8 van Nes, A. 1996. Conflicting water uses and possible answers from the Jabotabek water resources management study. In Indonesia. Ministry of Public Works. Directorate General of Water Resources Development; Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA); Indonesian National Committee of ICID (INACID). Proceedings of Joint Seminar on Optimization of Water Allocation for Sustainable Development, Jakarta, Indonesia, 16-17 January 1996. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ministry of Public Works. Directorate General of Water Resources Development. pp.I:1-16.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G662 IND Record No: H029058)
9 Lanti, A. 2006. A regulatory approach to the Jakarta water supply concession contracts. International Journal of Water Resources Development. Special issue: Water management for large cities, 22(2):255-276.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H039207)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H039213)
11 Varis, O.; Somlyody, L. 1997. Global urbanization and urban water: Can sustainability be afforded? Water Science and Technology, 35(9):21-32.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: P 7815 Record No: H039902)
12 1994. Managing water resources to meet megacity needs: Proceedings of the regional consultation, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, 24-27 August 1993. Manila, Philippines: ADB. 425p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 628.1 G000 MAN Record No: H040301)
13 UNESCO. IHP. 2006. Urban water conflicts: an analysis of the origins and nature of water related unrest and conflicts in the urban context. Paris Cedex, France: UNESCO-IHP. 182p. (UNESCO Working Series SC-2006/WS/19)
(Location: IWMI HQ Record No: H041187)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H052899)
(2.58 MB) (2.58 MB)
To cope with massive development, many urban and surrounding rural areas have been agglomerated into a greater metropolitan area, aiming for regional economic development. Many of these metropolitan areas have experienced a dramatic increase in impacted area and economic loss from annual flooding. The issues and challenges emerging from transboundary river flood risk management have become a major concern for the Jakarta metropolitan area with a long river basin crossing several administrative jurisdictions. Previous studies have addressed the challenges of flood risk, but they have tended to overlook transboundary issues and power sharing. To tackle future flood events, this paper aims to unveil transboundary challenges and power sharing in flood management, learning from Ciliwung River. As the longest river basin crossing cities and regencies of Greater Jakarta, the complexity of Ciliwung flood risk management was driven by flood variables triggered not only by natural, physical, and socioeconomic factors, but also by transboundary challenges and power sharing. A total of 13 significant transboundary flood drivers were identified from the literature, policy, and practices. Using Matrice d'Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée á un Classement (MICMAC), a power–dependency model, several strategic key flood drivers were further recognized based on key stakeholders' perspectives obtained from in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). Findings of the study show that a lack of control of spatial plans and weak stakeholder coordination–cooperation are found to be the priority key flood drivers for risk reduction intervention. Finally, this study contributes to the literature on governance of flood risk management by emphasizing the need for a coordinated and integrated approach to mitigate flood risks that extend beyond administrative boundaries, enhancing overall resilience and sustainability.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from