Your search found 18 records
1 Pasandaran, E. 1997. Water resource allocation in Indonesia: Sustaining agricultural development in the Brantas River Basin. In Rosegrant, M. W.; Witcover, J.; Gerpacio, R. V.; Ringler, C. (Eds.), Agricultural sustainability, growth, and poverty alleviation in East and Southeast Asia: Issues and policies: Proceedings of the International Conference held from 3rd to 6th October, 1994 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Feldafing, Germany: Deutsche Stiftung fnr internationale Entwicklung, Zentralstelle fnr ErnShrung und Landwirtschaft. pp.254-276.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 338.1 G000 ROS Record No: H018450)
2 Sunaryo, T. M.; Tirta, P. J. 1998. Water quality management and community involvement in Brantas River Basin, East Java Province. In ICID, The Tenth Afro-Asian Regional Conference Proceedings: Water and land resources development and management for sustainable use, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, 19-24 July 1998. Volume II - C. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (INACID) pp.C1:1-11.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: ICID 631.7 G570 ICI Record No: H022974)
3 Usman, A. R. 1998. Water resources management: Indonesian experience in Brantas River Basin. In ICID, The Tenth Afro-Asian Regional Conference Proceedings: Water and land resources development and management for sustainable use, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, 19-24 July 1998. Volume II - C. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (INACID) pp.C2:1-7.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: ICID 631.7 G570 ICI Record No: H022975)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G570 ARR Record No: H025265)
Proceedings of the Regional Consultation Workshop, "Towards a Policy for Water Resources Development and Management in the Asian and Pacific Region," ADB, Manila, Philippines, 10-14 May 1996.
5 2000. Integrated water resources management in Indonesia: An empirical experience in the Brantas River Basin. Malang, Indonesia: Perusahaan Umum Jasa Tirta. iv, 95p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 5719 Record No: H028016)
6 Usman, R. 1996. Integrated river basin management - case study: the Brantas River Basin. In Indonesia. Ministry of Public Works. Directorate General of Water Resources Development; Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA); Indonesian National Committee of ICID (INACID). Proceedings of Joint Seminar on Optimization of Water Allocation for Sustainable Development, Jakarta, Indonesia, 16-17 January 1996. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ministry of Public Works. Directorate General of Water Resources Development. pp.I:246-258.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 333.91 G662 IND Record No: H029070)
7 Sunaryo, T. M.; Harnanto, A.; Indraswari, H. 1996. Economic instrument as a supporting effort on water use efficiency. In Indonesia. Ministry of Public Works. Directorate General of Water Resources Development; Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA); Indonesian National Committee of ICID (INACID). Proceedings of Joint Seminar on Optimization of Water Allocation for Sustainable Development, Jakarta, Indonesia, 16-17 January 1996. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ministry of Public Works. Directorate General of Water Resources Development. pp.II:37-46.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G662 IND Record No: H029079)
8 Usman, R. 2001. Integrated water resources management: lessons from Brantas River Basin in Indonesia. In Abernethy, C. L. (Ed.). Intersectoral management of river basins. Proceedings of an International Workshop on Integrated Water Management in Water-Stressed River Basins in Developing Countries: Strategies for Poverty Alleviation and Agricultural Growth, Loskop Dam, South Africa, 16-21 October 2000. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI); Feldafing, Germany: German Foundation for International Development (DSE). pp.273-296.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G000 ABE Record No: H029124)
(1.00)
9 Sunaryo, T. M. 2002. Integrated water-resources management in a river-basin context: The Brantas River Basin, Indonesia. In Bruns, B.; Bandaragoda, D. J.; Samad, M. (Eds.), Integrated water-resources management in a river basin context: Institutional strategies for improving the productivity of agricultural water management. Proceedings of the Regional Workshop, Malang, Indonesia, January 15-19, 2001. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI; Regional Workshop on “Integrated Water Resources Management in a River Basin Context: Institutional Strategies for Improving the Productivity of Agricultural Water Management,” Malang, Indonesia 15-19 January 2001. pp.277-305.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 631.7.3 G570 BRU, IWMI 631.7 G000 REG Record No: H030276)
(0.26 MB)
10 Samad, M. 2003. Five-country regional study on the development of effective water-management institutions: A synthesis of findings from the case studies. In Bruns, B.; Bandaragoda, D. J. (Eds.), Governance for integrated water resources management in a river-basin context: Proceedings of a regional seminar, Bangkok, May, 2002. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI. pp.225-245.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G570 BRU Record No: H032950)
11 Rodgers, C.; Zafraano, R.; Subianto, T. 2003. Alternative water-policy scenarios using integrated river-basin modeling: The Brantas River Basin, Indonesia. In Bruns, B.; Bandaragoda, D. J. (Eds.), Governance for integrated water resources management in a river-basin context: Proceedings of a regional seminar, Bangkok, May, 2002. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI. pp.139-179.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G570 BRU Record No: H032948)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G000 INT Record No: H034919)
(0.42 MB)
A regional study implemented by IWMI wth financial support from ADB (RETA 5812).
13 IWMI. 2003. Development of effective water-management institutions: final report, volume III, case studies of advanced river basins. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI) vi, 76p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G000 IWM Record No: H034921)
(5.11 MB)
A regional study implemented by IWMI wth financial support from ADB (RETA 5812).
14 Samad, Madar. 2005. Institutions for agricultural water management in water scarce river basins in Asia: lessons from five case studies. In Network of Asian River Basin Organisations. Second NARBO Training Workshop on River Basin Management and Organisations for Mid-Career Professionals in South Asian countries held at The Beach Hotel, Negombo, Sri Lanka, 24 to 29 April 2005. Manila, Philippines: NARBO. 21p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H037721)
(0.10 MB)
15 Sarwan, S.; Subojanto, T. W.; Rodgers, C. 2005. Development of water rights in Indonesia. In Bruns, B. R.; Ringler, C.; Meinzen-Dick, R. (Eds.). Water rights reform: Lessons for institutional design. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI. pp.237-260.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 346.0432 G000 BRU Record No: H038836)
16 Bhat, A. 2008. The politics of model maintenance: the Murray Darling and Brantas River Basins compared. Water Alternatives, 1(2):201-218.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H041569)
17 Kemper, K.; Dinar, A.; Blomquist, W. (Eds.) 2005. Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management decentralization: the principle of managing water resources at the lowest appropriate level — when and why does it (not) work in practice? Washington, DC, USA: World Bank. 65p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H044387)
(5.74 MB) (5.74 MB)
18 Yano, S.; Yamaguchi, M.; Yokoi, E.; Kanayama, T.; Kubota, A.; Ogawada, D.; Matsumura, A.; Gomez-Garcia, M.; Ruritan. R. V.; Oki, T. 2020. Using the sectoral and statistical demand to availability index to assess freshwater scarcity risk and effect of water resource management. Journal of Hydrology X, 8:100058. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100058]
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049946)
(4.88 MB) (4.88 MB)
A more objective assessment of the freshwater scarcity risk at a watershed basis scale contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in which water plays a key role in issues like safe and affordable drinking water, water-related disasters, forest management, biodiversity and ecosystems. Within the SDGs, water scarcity is assessed primarily by using the ratio of withdrawal to availability (WTA). This index has been developed to evaluate the average annual conditions on a broad scale, such as country or large basin. However, there are insufficient cases for assessing specific and detailed risk conditions by using this original WTA concept, due to seasonal and interannual variations of the river discharge and withdrawal volumes. For example, infrastructure (e.g. large dams) and its operation, can drastically change the available water and demand volumes at temporal scales finer than annual. Because recently many daily and monthly records of river discharge and water use have become publicly available, it is possible to conduct water scarcity risk assessments on a monthly basis. By employing these datasets, in this study, we propose to compare volumes of available water and demand by using a Sectoral and Statistical Demand to Availability (SS-DTA) index. The novelty of this index is marked not only by the use of monthly volumes of available and required water but also by how environmental water requirements are included and the statistical relevance of the evaluation. Usually, to determine the available water resources, existing methods deduct from the river discharge the volumes that are required to preserve the surrounding ecosystems. Our proposed method considers the environmental flow requirements as one of the water-demand sectors allowing a simultaneous evaluation of water use that is not possible with existing methods. We applied this method to three representative river basins, two located in Japan (the Tone and the Arakawa River basins) and the Brantas River basin in Indonesia. The results showed the variations of water scarcity risk level through the river operation in each river basin. In the Tone River basin, it was succeeded in a drought year to decrease its risk level from 1 to 0, and to transport sufficient volume of water to the Arakawa River basin through an artificial channel to meet the demands at the same time. In the Brantas River basin, the river operation changed the SS-DTA score from 3 to 2, which means the water scarcity risk level was alleviated, while the main impact of the operation was found in high-water season to decrease the flood risk. Because the number, type, and priority of water demands can be adjusted based on the local situation and all the timeseries data of each demand sector are visualized in parallel, the result includes not only the whole risk level of the river basin but also the practical and specific degree of the risk with demand sector information.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from