Your search found 5 records
1 Agarwal, A.; Narain, S.; Sen, S. (Eds.) 1999. State of India's environment 5: The citizens' fifth report. Part I - National overview. New Delhi, India: Centre for Science and Environment. viii, 440p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 363.7 G635 AGA Record No: H024783)
2 Mishra, A. K.; Paverkar, K. P.; Chaudhari, R. S.; Tripati, A. K.; Reddy, D. D.; Hathi, K. M.; Mandal, K. G.; Ramana, S.; Acharya, C. L. 2003. Nutrient and water management studies for increasing productivity of soybean-based systems in operational scale watersheds. In Wani, S. P.; Maglinao, A. R.; Ramakrishna, A.; Rego, T. J. (Eds.), Integrated watershed management for land and water conservation and sustainable agricultural production in Asia: Proceedings of the ADB-ICRISAT-IWMI Project Review and Planning Meeting, 10-14 December 2001, Hanoi, Vietnam. Andhra Pradesh, India; Colombo, Sri Lanka; Manila, Philippines: ICRISAT; IWMI; ADB. pp.65-78.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IWMI 333.91 G570 WAN Record No: H034982)
(10.29 MB)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H042247)
(0.41 MB)
In response to the disappointing results of many regulatory or public investment approaches to watershed management, payments for environmental services has emerged as a new mechanism to maintain socially optimal environmental services by compensating people for the services they provide. However, without adequate understanding of stakeholders’ willingness to modify or maintain land use or water resource decisions, market-based mechanisms may prove to be unsustainable, with uncertain social and environmental outcomes. Negotiating resource use patterns is a process that requires an understanding of the type, level and duration of incentives for stakeholders to co-operate meaningfully. In this paper, we describe a negotiation support framework that has been developed from the literature and field experiences in Costa Rica and India. The framework then serves to critically examine a case study from each country to draw empirical lessons from the inherently political and contested process of watershed management.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 631.7.5 G635 NAR Record No: H044743)
(0.32 MB)
5 Starkl, M.; Amerasinghe, Priyanie; Essl, L.; Jampani, Mahesh; Kumar, D.; Asolekar; S. R. 2015. Rapid assessment and SWOT analysis of non-technical aspects of natural wastewater treatment systems. In Wintgens. T.; Nattorp, A.; Elango, L.; Asolekar, S. R. (Eds.). Natural water treatment systems for safe and sustainable water supply in the Indian context: Saph Pani, London, UK: IWA Publishing. pp. 283-300.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H047552)
(7.58 MB) (5.6 MB)
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from