Your search found 6 records
1 Yin, Y. Y.; Huang, G. H.; Hipel, K. W.. 1999. Fuzzy relation analysis for multicriteria water resources management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 125(1):41-47.
Water resource management ; Statistical analysis ; Conflict / USA / Great Lakes / St. Lawrence River Basin
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H023657)
2 Seifi, A.; Hipel, K. W.. 2001. Interior-point method for reservoir operation with stochastic inflows. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(1):48-57.
Reservoir operation ; Planning ; Stochastic process ; Models ; Optimization ; Case studies / USA / Canada / Great Lakes
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H027230)
3 Rajabi, S.; Hipel, K. W.; Kilgour, D. M. 2001. Multiple criteria screening of a large water policy subset selection problem. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(3):533-546.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H029172)
4 Gopalakrishnan, C.; Levy, J.; Li, K. W.; Hipel, K. W.. 2005. Water allocation among multiple stakeholders: Conflict analysis of the Waiahole Water Project, Hawaii. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 21(2):283-295.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H037237)
5 Ghanbarpour, M. R.; Hipel, K. W.; Abbaspour, K. C. 2005. Prioritizing long-term watershed management strategies using group decision analysis. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 21(2):297-309.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H 37238)
6 Talukder, B.; Blay-Palmer, A.; vanLoon, G. W.; Hipel, K. W.. 2020. Towards complexity of agricultural sustainability assessment: main issues and concerns. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 6:100038. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100038]
Sustainable agriculture ; Assessment ; Indicators ; Climate change ; Resilience ; Stakeholders ; Governance ; Policies ; Environmental effects ; Social aspects ; Economic aspects ; Farming systems
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049751)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972720300209/pdfft?md5=0a74768ac2e31e4e67e7f467a9e3685c&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972720300209-main.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049751.pdf
https://vlibrary.iwmi.org/pdf/H049751.pdf
(1.26 MB) (1.26 MB)
The sustainability of agricultural systems is of paramount concern in order to ensure the survival and wellbeing of humans throughout the world. Sustainability is a complex issue involving multiple factors that fit broadly within economic, social and environmental areas. Given its complexity, this paper examines the question of how sustainability can be assessed in a way that gives a holistic picture of the separate and interrelated factors. The paper then presents a literature review, field experience and the use of complex adaptive systems to identify the issues and concerns that need to be addressed during agricultural sustainability assessment and categorizes them into in seven groups: integration of capitals; maintaining resilience, adaptation and transformation; ensuring system performance; involving stakeholders; mixing interdisciplinary views; integration of scales; and practicing good governance. Based on these issues and concerns, a set of indicators are suggested that will assist with holistic agricultural sustainability assessment in a given area.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
