Your search found 11 records
1 Winther, S.; Ahlers, R.. 1996. Challenging the conventional development approach: challenging conventional gender ideas?: gender and participation in natural resource management - a case in Sri Lanka. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI). 46p.
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: IIMI 305.4 G744 WIN Record No: H021760)
2 Ahlers, R.; Vlaar, S. 1995. Up to the sky: A study on gender issues in irrigation in Cambodia in the provinces of Takeo and Prey Veng. Consultancy report of SAWA, Consultants for Development, The Netherlands. ii, 93p. + annexes.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7088042 G700 AHL Record No: H016410)
3 Ahlers, R.; Rymshaw, E. 1999. La politica en la practica: Mercados de Agua en Cuatro Distritos de riego en Mexico. In Compilation of research reporting papers. IWMI. Mexico Country Program. pp.24-31.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.8 G404 AHL Record No: H025321)
4 Hernandez, M. F.; Ahlers, R.. 1999. Mercado de agua en el Distrito de Riego 017. In Compilation of research reporting papers. IWMI. Mexico Country Program. pp.32-48.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.8 G404 AHL Record No: H025322)
5 Ahlers, R.. 1999. Determinaran las relaciones de genero el futuro de la agricultura ragada?: Relaciones de genero y mercados de agua. In Compilation of research reporting papers. IWMI. Mexico Country Program. pp.49-62.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.8 G404 AHL Record No: H025323)
6 Ahlers, R.; Rymshaw, E. 1998. La politica en la practica: Mercados de agua en cuatro distritos de riego en Mexico. In Velez, E. P.; Garcia, A. E.; Panta, J. E. R.; Saenz, E. M. (Eds.), III Seminario Internacional Transferencia de los Sistemas de Riego, Montecillo, Mexico, Septiembre de 1998: Memorias. pp.195-202.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.3 G302 VEL Record No: H025340)
7 Ahlers, R.. 2000. Gender issues in irrigation. In Tortajada, C. (Ed.), Women and water management: The Latin American Experience. New Delhi, India: OUP. pp.203-216.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 305.4 G302 TOR Record No: H025493)
8 Ahlers, R.. 2000. Relaciones de genero y mercados de agua en la comarca Lagunera. In Spanish. In Buechler, S.; Martelo, E. Z. (Eds.). Genero y manejo del agua y tierra en communidades rurales de Mexico. Mexico City, DF, Mexico: IWMI, Mexico Program. pp.157-175. (IWMI Serie Latinoamericana 014)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.3 G404 BUE Record No: H026129)
(0.57 MB)
9 Ahlers, R.. 2005. Gender dimensions of neoliberal water policy in Mexico and Bolivia: Empowering or disempowering? In Bennett, V.; Dávila-Poblete, S.; Rico, M. N. (Eds.), Opposing currents: The politics of water and gender in Latin America. Pittsburg, PA, USA: University of Pittsburgh Press. pp.53-71.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7088042 G302 BEN Record No: H036388)
10 Ahlers, R.. (Ed.) 1999. Informe final de los estudios del IWMI en La Comarca Lagunera, Mexico. Mexico City, DF, Mexico: International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI). Mexico Program. Compilation of IWMI research reporting papers. 15-17 January, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico. 87p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: IIMI 631.7.8 G404 AHL Record No: H025320)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H044309)
(0.40 MB)
The current neo-liberal moment in water policy appears to offer possibilities for realizing feminist ambitions. Several feminist scholars see the individualization and privatization of resource rights as offering possibilities for confronting gender inequalities rooted in, and reproduced by, historic and structural male favoured access to productive resources such as land and water. But we seriously doubt a progressive feminist potential of neo-liberal reforms in the water sector. We focus on water used for agricultural purposes, because neo-liberal water proposals are premised on taking water out of agriculture to uses with higher marginal economic returns. A first set of doubts involves water as a specific resource, largely because of its propensity to flow. Rights to water are less fixed and more prone to be contested at various levels and in different socio-legal domains than rights to other natural resources. The second set stems from our disagreement with the ideological underpinnings of the neo-liberal project. It reflects our concern about how water reforms articulate with wider political-economic structures and historical dynamics characterized by new ways of capitalist expansion. Furthermore, mainstream neo-liberal water policy language and concepts tend to hide precisely those issues that, from a critical feminist perspective, need to be questioned. Feminist reflections about tenure insecurity and social inequities in relation to water clash with the terms of a neo-liberal framework that invisibilizes, naturalizes and objectifies the politics and powers involved in water re-allocation. A feminist response calls for challenging the individualization, marketization and consumer/client focus of the neo-liberal paradigm.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from