Your search found 8 records
1 Skaggs, R. W.; Hunt, W. F.; Chescheir, G. M.; Amatya, D. M.. 1995. Reference simulations for evaluating wetland hydrology. In Campbell, K. L. (Ed.), Versatility of wetlands in the agricultural landscape. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.1-10.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 CAM Record No: H018645)
2 Hunt, W. F.; Skaggs, R. W.; Chescheir, G. M.; Amatya, D. M.. 1995. Reference wetland simulations: Methods of comparison. In Campbell, K. L. (Ed.), Versatility of wetlands in the agricultural landscape. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.11-20.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 CAM Record No: H018646)
3 Amatya, D. M.; Chescheir, G. M.; Skaggs, R. W. 1995. Hydrologic effects of wetland location and size in an agricultural landscape. In Campbell, K. L. (Ed.), Versatility of wetlands in the agricultural landscape. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.477-488.
Wetlands ; Hydrology ; Watersheds ; Simulation models ; Computer models ; Water management / USA / North Carolina
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 CAM Record No: H018662)
4 Amatya, D. M.; Skaggs, R. W.; Gregory, J. D. 1997. Evaluation of a watershed scale forest hydrologic model. Agricultural Water Management, 32(3):239-258.
Watershed management ; Hydrology ; Simulation models ; Drainage ; Evapotranspiration / USA / North Carolina
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H020444)
5 Sun, G.; Amatya, D. M.; McNulty, S. G.; Skaggs, R. W.; Hughes, J. H. 2000. Climate change impacts on the hydrology and productivity of a pine plantation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(2):367-374.
Climate ; Forestry ; Hydrology ; Drainage ; Ecosystems ; Watersheds ; Groundwater ; Water table ; Simulation models ; Water balance / USA / North Carolina / Carteret County
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H026473)
6 Lu, J.; Sun, G.; McNulty, S. G.; Amatya, D. M.. 2003. Modeling actual evapotranspiration from forested watersheds across the southeastern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(4):887-896.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H035014)
7 Fernandez, G. P.; Chescheir, G. M.; Skaggs, R. W.; Amatya, D. M.. 2006. DRAINMOD-GIS: A lumped parameter watershed scale drainage and water quality model. Agricultural Water Management, 81(1-2):77-97.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H038440)
8 Atef, S. S.; Sadeqinazhad, F.; Farjaad, F.; Amatya, D. M.. 2019. Water conflict management and cooperation between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Journal of Hydrology, 570:875-892. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.075]
Water resources ; International waters ; Water management ; Conflict management ; River basins ; International cooperation ; International agreements ; International law ; Water institutions ; Corporate culture ; Decision support systems ; Models ; Riparian zones / Pakistan / Afghanistan / Kabul River Basin
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049139)
(5.65 MB)
Managing water resource systems usually involves conflicts. Water recognizes no borders, defining the global geopolitics of water conflicts, cooperation, negotiations, management, and resource development. Negotiations to develop mechanisms for two or more states to share an international watercourse involve complex networks of natural, social and political system (Islam and Susskind, 2013). The Kabul River Basin presents unique circumstances for developing joint agreements for its utilization, rendering moot unproductive discussions of the rights of upstream and downstream states based on principles of absolute territorial sovereignty or absolute territorial integrity (McCaffrey, 2007). This paper analyses the different stages of water conflict transformation between Afghanistan and Pakistan. It first examines historical disputes between the upstream and downstream riparians, revolving around contending rights claims, resulting in zero-sum confrontations with one party’s loss as another’s gain, possibly ending in confrontation. The paper then formulates a decision support tool, a mechanism for transforming conflict into cooperation, and concludes by introducing practical methods for identifying basin needs and sharing benefits, enabling riparians to negotiate a win-win process.
Powered by DB/Text WebPublisher, from
