Your search found 45 records
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 161 Record No: H01101)
2 Merriam, J. L.; Shearer, M. N.; Burt, C. M.. 1983. Evaluating irrigation systems and practice. In Jensen, M. E. (Ed.), Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.721-760. (ASAE monograph no. 3)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 JEN Record No: H03212)
3 Burt, C. M.; Lord, J. M. Jr. 1981. Demand theory and application in irrigation district operation. In American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Irrigation scheduling for water and energy conservation in the 80's. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.150-158. (ASAE publication 23-81)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 AME Record No: H03383)
4 Burt, C. M.; Keller, J. 1977. Very-low pressure sprinkler irrigation. Logan, UT, USA: Utah State University. 214p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 BUR Record No: H04812)
5 Ayers, T. G.; Jonas, S.; Burt C. M.. 1986. Automation for downstream control on small irrigation canals. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. 7p. (ASAE paper no.86-2078)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1.1 G000 AYE Record No: H05170)
Paper presented at 1986 summer meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, San Louis, Obispo, CA, 29 June - 2 July 1986
6 Merriam, J. L.; Burt, C. M.. 1990. Alleviation on surface and subsurface drainage disposal problems by improved delivery schedule. Paper presented at the USCID Meeting, 14-16 September 1988, San Diego, California.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 138 Record No: H06503)
7 Burt, C. M.; Hash, C. 1985. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) injection for drip irrigation. In Drip/trickle irrigation in action: Proceedings of the Third International Drip/Trickle Irrigation Congress, Centre Plaza Holiday Inn, Fresno, California, USA, 18-21 November 1985. Vol. II: St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.712-717.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 DRI Record No: H09662)
8 Merriam, J. L.; Burt, C. M.. 1988. Alleviation of surface and subsurface drainage disposal problems by improved delivery scheduling. Paper presented at the USCID meeting, San Diego, California, 14 -16 September 1988. Question 42.1.2 - Disposal of drainage waters. 11p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 2114 Record No: H010506)
9 Burt, C. M.. 1992. Irrigation research requirements. In Le Moigne, G.; Barghouti, S.; Garbus, L., Developing and improving irrigation and drainage systems: Selected papers from World Bank seminars. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank. pp.111-115.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7 G000 LEM Record No: H011818)
10 Burt, C. M.; Gartrell, G. 1993. Irrigation-canal -- simulation model usage. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 119(4):631-636.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H013054)
Unsteady canal-simulation model usage requires serious investments of time and personnel. The reasons for deciding to invest in a model, as well as reasons not to invest, are discussed. For most cases, it is better to invest in the improvement of an existing model than the writing of a new model. Many excellent models are available, although very few can be considered user-friendly for the average design engineer. Unsteady flow -simulation models are not recommended for real-time control, but are key tools for the study of various control scenarios. Canal models can simulate an actual canal, but the user must input the necessary canal gate-control algorithms in order to study the effects of various types of automation and control. The user must also understand the basics of the system to be modeled and have the time and capability to determine if model results are reasonable and sound.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H013058)
The Cal Poly Model Canal, located at the Water Delivery Facility, Irrigation Training and Research Center, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Calif., was built to accommodate the study and promotion of automated downstream control. Being a large, fully functional scale model of a canal, it was used to collect data for use by the Irrigation Canal System Hydraulic Modeling Task Committee of the ASCE Irrigation and Drainage Division. The data was used by Task Committee members to help evaluate numerical models for simulation of unsteady free-surface flow. The Model Canal and the collected data are discussed. This paper is part of a series sponsored by the Irrigation Canal System Hydraulic Modeling Task Committee. Also published in Ritter, W. F. (Eds.) 1991. Irrigation and drainage: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference sponsored by the Irrigation and Drainage Division of the ASCE, and the Hawaii Section, ASCE, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 22-26, 1991. New York, NY, USA: ASCE. pp.481-486.
12 Burt, C. M.. 1994. Media tanks for filtration. Part 1: Tank sizing and media selection. Irrigation Journal, 44(5):14, 16-17.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H015389)
13 Burt, C. M.. 1994. Media tanks for filtration, Part II: Underdrains, installations, and adjustments. Irrigation Journal, 44(6):17-20.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H015990)
14 Burt, C. M.. 1995. Advances in chemigation. Irrigation Journal, 45(6):8-9.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H017769)
15 Burt, C. M.. 1995. Guidelines for establishing irrigation scheduling policies. In ICID; FAO, 46th International Executive Council, ICID/FAO Workshop on Irrigation Scheduling: From Theory to Practice, FAO, Rome, Italy, 12-13 September 1995 - Background papers. Rome, Italy: FAO. 6p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 ICI Record No: H018160)
16 Burt, C. M.; Plusquellec, H. L. 1990. Water delivery control. In Hoffman, G. J.; Howell, T. A.; Solomon, K. H. (Eds.), Management of farm irrigation systems. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. pp.374-423.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7.8 G000 HOF Record No: H018313)
17 Burt, C. M.; Styles, S. W. 1996. Sizing of header and flushing manifolds for row crop drip. Irrigation Journal, 46(4):24-27.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H019124)
18 Burt, C. M.; Gartrell, G. 1991. Canal models and you. In Ritter, W. F. (Ed.), Irrigation and drainage: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference sponsored by the Irrigation and Drainage Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Hawaii Section, ASCE, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 22-26, 1991. New York, NY, USA: ASCE. pp.238-243.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7 G430 RIT Record No: H019888)
Unsteady canal simulation models require serious investments of time and personnel. The reasons for deciding to invest in a model, as well as reasons to not invest, are discussed. Canal models can simulate an actual canal, but the user must input the necessary control algorithms in order to study the effects of various types of automation and control. The user must also understand the basics of the system to be modeled and have the time and capability to determine if model results are reasonable and sound.
19 Clemmens, A. J.; Holly, F. M.; Burt, C. M.; Devries, J. J. 1991. Future needs for unsteady flow canal models. In Ritter, W. F. (Ed.), Irrigation and drainage: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference sponsored by the Irrigation and Drainage Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Hawaii Section, ASCE, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 22-26, 1991. New York, NY, USA: ASCE. pp.501-507.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 631.7 G430 RIT Record No: H019911)
The ASCE task committee on "Irrigation Canal System Hydraulic Modeling" examined a number of the computer programs available for simulating unsteady open-channel flow. The committee identified current limitations of these models and needs for improvements.
20 Burt, C. M.. 1996. Essential water delivery policies for modern on-farm irrigation management. In International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID); FAO. Irrigation scheduling: from theory to practice. Proceedings of the ICID/FAO Workshop on Irrigation Scheduling, Rome, Italy, 12-13 September 1995. Rome, Italy: FAO. pp.273-278. (FAO Water Reports 8)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: 631.7.1 G000 FAO Record No: H021336)
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from