Your search found 10 records
1 Hinaman, K. C. 1993. Use of a Geographic Information System to assemble input-data sets for a finite-difference model of ground-water flow. Water Resources Bulletin, 29(3):401-405.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H013765)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H017107)
3 Lichtenberg, E.; Penn, T. 1996. Issues in regulating groundwater quality policy under uncertainty. In Pigram, J. J. (Ed.). Security and sustainability in a mature water economy: a global perspective. Water and Resource Economics Consortium, proceedings of an international workshop, University of Melbourne, February 1996. Armidale, NSW, Australia: University of New England. Centre for Water Policy Research. pp.387-406.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 PIG Record No: H020177)
4 1997. With rivers to the sea: Interaction of land activities, fresh water and enclosed coastal seas: Abstracts. Joint Conference - 7th Stockholm Water Symposium and the 3rd International Conference on the Environmental Management of Enclosed Coastal Seas (EMECS), 10-15 August 1997, Stockholm, Sweden. 483p.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G000 WIT Record No: H021083)
5 Schmugge, T. 1999. Estimating near-surface soil hydraulic properties with microwave remote sensing. In Corwin, D. L.; Loague, K.; Ellsworth, T. R. (Eds.), Assessment of non-point source pollution in the Vadose Zone. Washington, DC, USA: American Geophysical Union. pp.217-222.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: 333.91 G430 COR Record No: H024750)
6 Smith, W. J. 2002. The clearinghouse approach to enhancing informed public participation in watershed management utilizing GIS and Internet technology. Water International, 27(4):558-567.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H031320)
7 Yetman, K. T. 2002. Using Maryland’s stream corridor assessment survey to prioritize watershed restoration efforts. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38(4):905-914.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H031350)
8 Johnson, P. A.; Tereska, R. L.; Brown, E. R. 2002. Using technical adaptive management to improve design guidelines for urban instream structures. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38(4):1143-1152.
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: PER Record No: H031369)
(Location: IWMI-HQ Call no: P 7048 Record No: H035655)
(Location: IWMI HQ Call no: e-copy only Record No: H049948)
(0.97 MB) (996 KB)
Human uses of land and water are directly linked and must, therefore, be managed with each other in mind. This paper puts forward an approach for integrating sustainable water resource management into local land use decision-making in the Potomac basin. The approach includes developing a clear understanding of the current regulatory, programmatic, and financial approaches to land use management; identifying opportunities from innovation; and developing a flexible, stakeholder-based framework for moving forward. Four opportunities for innovation were identified in the Potomac basin utilizing this approach, including enhancing coordination and access to information, promoting incentives to achieve desired outcomes, encouraging and promoting innovation, and integrating programs to achieve multiple objectives. The successful integration of land and water decision-making requires a sustained, long-term commitment to improvement rather than a one-time fix mentality. Initial steps for implementation include identifying and engaging diverse partners, as well as establishing channels for information dissemination. The lessons learned from this work may prove valuable to decision-makers in other regions to holistically manage diverse land and water resources.
Powered by DB/Text
WebPublisher, from